Skip to main content
. 2026 Mar 9;17:1692949. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1692949

Table 3.

Effect size analysis for primary learning outcomes.

Outcome variable k N Hedges’ g 95% CI SE Z p I 2 τ 2 Q
Vocabulary learning overall 44 3,789 0.72*** [0.58, 0.86] 0.071 10.14 <0.001 52.0% 0.089 89.67***
Word recognition 41 3,456 0.68*** [0.53, 0.83] 0.076 8.95 <0.001 48.2% 0.082 79.23***
Vocabulary output 38 3,178 0.76*** [0.59, 0.93] 0.087 8.74 <0.001 56.4% 0.095 84.86***
Lexical depth 23 1,967 0.71*** [0.49, 0.93] 0.112 6.34 <0.001 61.8% 0.117 57.62***
Metacognitive strategy 42 3,547 0.68*** [0.52, 0.84] 0.082 8.29 <0.001 55.7% 0.093 92.54***
Metacognitive knowledge 38 3,201 0.71*** [0.53, 0.89] 0.092 7.72 <0.001 58.3% 0.105 88.76***
Metacognitive monitoring 35 2,876 0.66*** [0.48, 0.84] 0.092 7.17 <0.001 52.9% 0.089 72.24***
Metacognitive regulation 32 2,634 0.65*** [0.45, 0.85] 0.102 6.37 <0.001 59.6% 0.108 76.73***
Learning persistence 31 2,654 0.64*** [0.47, 0.81] 0.087 7.36 <0.001 49.8% 0.078 59.84***

k = number of studies; N = total sample size; SE = standard error; ***p < 0.001.