Table 2.
Characteristics of samples for studies using machine learning approaches. All studies used supervised learning, with sample sizes ranging from 40 to 727 (median 326, IQR 66-410).
| Study | Population type | Participants, N | Age (years), mean (SD) Sex (female), % |
Ground truth assessment, anxiety measure (type) | Wearable device (consumer or research-grade) | Machine learning task | Predictors | Algorithms | Validation method |
| Coutts et al, 2020 (United Kingdom) Trial 1 [70] | University students | 68 | Age: 21 (NRa) Female: 64% |
DASS-Ab (state) and STAIc (trait and state) | Biobeam band (research) | Binary classification (supervised) | Heart rate variability | Deep neural networks (LSTMd) | Train-test split: training (80%), test (10%), validation (10%) |
| Coutts et al, 2020 (United Kingdom) Trial 2 [70] | University students | 584 | Age: NR Female: NR |
DASS-A (state) and STAI (trait and state) | Biobeam band (research) | Binary classification (supervised) | Heart rate variability | Deep neural networks (LSTM) | Train-test split: training (80%), test (10%), validation (10%) |
| Fukuda et al, 2020 (Japan) [71] | Office workers | 60 | Age: NR Female: NR |
DAMSe (state) | Fitbit Charge 3 (Consumer) | Binary classification (supervised) | Sleep actigraphy data (13 features, eg, total sleep time and number of wake) | RFf | Leave-one-person-out cross-validation |
| He et al (2025) [72] | University students | 40 | Age: 21.7 (3.11) Female: 52.5% |
STAI Y6 (state) | E4 Empatica Hexoskin smart shirt | Binary classification (unsupervised) | Wrist-worn wearable: skin temprature and EDAg
Smart shirt: ECGh |
SVMi, RF, KNNj, naïve Bayes | Leave-one-participant-out |
| Lee et al, 2022 (Korea) [73] | Older adults with mild cognitive impairment | 352 | Age: 72.48 (5.9) Female: 73% |
Clinical diagnosis (Trait) | Fitbit Alta HR2 (Consumer) | Binary classification (supervised) | Model 1: 24-hour activity rhythms and sleep patternk
Model 2: Model 1+ minimal K-GAIl (5 items) |
Logistic regression, SVM, RF, GBMm | 10-fold stratified cross-validation |
| Lee et al, 2024 (Korea) [74] | Older adults with mild cognitive impairment | 352 | Age: 72.5 (5.9) Female: 73% |
Clinical diagnosis (Trait) | Fitbit Alta HR2 (Consumer) | Binary classification (supervised) | Model 1: activity, sleep Model 2: activity + minimal K-GAI |
Convolutional neural network, LSTM, residual network | Cross-validation |
| Saylam et al, 2023 (United States) [75] | Office workers | 727 | Age: NR Female: NR |
Single itemn (state) | Garmin smartwatch (consumer) | Regression | Activity, stress, sleep, heart rate | RF, XGBoosto, LSTM | 80% training, 20% testing |
| Saylam et al, 2024 (United States) [76] | College students | Baseline: ~700 Follow-up: 300 |
Age: NR Female: NR |
BAIp | Fitbit (consumer) | Regression | Activity and sleep | RF, XGBoost, LSTM | Training: 5 semesters Validation: 2 semesters Testing: 2 semesters |
aNR: not reported.
bDASS-A: Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-Anxiety Subscale.
cSTAI: State Trait Anxiety Inventory
dLSTM: Long Short-Term Memory networks.
eDAMS: Depression and Anxiety Mood Scale.
fRF: random forest.
gEDA: electrodermal activity.
hECG: electrocardiogram.
iSVM: Support Vector Machine.
jKNN: k-nearest neighbors.
kModel 1: 24-hour activity rhythms (interdaily stability [the stability of an activity rhythm of a daily pattern], intra-daily variability [the variability of the activity rhythms throughout the day], dominant rest phase onset [the start time of the 5-hour period with the least activity within 24 hours], and sleep patterns (total sleep time, sleep onset latency, wake after sleep onset, and sleep quality).
lK-GAI: Korean version of Geriatric Anxiety Inventory.
mGBM: gradient boosting machine.
nSingle-item question “Please select the response that shows how anxious you feel at the moment. Response scale: 1 (not at all anxious), 2 (a little anxious), 3 (moderately anxious), 4 (very anxious), and 5 (extremely anxious).”
oXGBoost: extreme gradient boosting.
pBAI: Beck Anxiety Inventory.