Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 27;8(3):vetevid-8-3-664. doi: 10.18849/ve.v8i3.664

Ji et al. (2021).

Population: Large White x DM (Duroc x Min Pig [YDM]), (China).
Sample size:

Before weaning: 12 litters (133 piglets, 11.2 ± 1.5 piglets per pen).

After weaning: 12 litters (120 piglets), selected 10 piglets per litter (four litters in each treatment group), selected with similar body weight, sex balanced.

Intervention details:

Pre-weaning treatment groups: Piglets were randomly allocated into a treatment group.

Group 1: control group, no contact or socialisation (CON), n = 4 litters (43 piglets). Housing design: littermate-only with sow in a farrowing crate until weaning.

Group 2: intermittent contact / socialisation group (IM), n = 4 litters (46 piglets). Socialisation housing design: littermate-only with sow in a farrowing crate on days 1–14, then two neighbouring litters socialised in shared activity area on days 14–35 for 3 hours per day. Socialisation group size: two litters per pen (socialisation group size is the number of litters that interact with one another during lactation).

Group 3: continuous contact / socialisation group (CM), n = 4 litters (44 piglets).

Socialisation housing design: littermate-only with sow in a farrowing crate on days 1–14, then two neighbouring litters socialised in shared activity area on days 14–35 with 24 hours access. Socialisation group size: two litters per pen.

Study design: Randomised control trial.
Outcome studied:

Weaning age: 35 days.

Socialisation length: 21 days.

Regroup condition: CON: Randomly mixed according to weight and sex, unfamiliar piglets. IM: Mixed with non-adjacent litters in same treatment group, unfamiliar piglets. CM: Mixed with non-adjacent litters in same treatment group, unfamiliar piglets.

Post-weaning group size: 10 piglets per group / pen. 

Physiological indicators: Blood, day 42 (1 week after mixing).

  • Interleukin-1β (IL1β).

  • Cortisol (COR).

  • Interleukin-6 (IL6).

  • Interleukin-10 (IL10).

  • Brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF).

    Growth performance: Day 63.

  • Group uniformity: coefficient of variation (CV).

  • Feed to meat ratio.

  • Average daily weight gain (ADWG).

    Behavioural indicators: Days 35–36, and days 35–38, 30-second scan sampling every 10 minutes.

  • Aggressive behaviours: fighting, head knocks.

  • Social interactions: oral-nasal contact, mounting, no reaction, avoiding, return approach.

Main Findings (relevant to PICO question)

Physiological indicators:

  • IL1β: CM > CON > IM (significant, P < 0.001).

  • COR: IM significantly lower than CON and CM (P = 0.005). IM < CON < CM (trend only).

  • BDNF: IM > CON (significant, P = 0.024).

    Growth performance: From weaning until the end of nursery (day 63).

  • CV: IM significantly lower CV than CM and CON (P = 0.043).

  • Feed to meat ratio: CM significantly higher than IM and CON (P = 0.001).

  • Average daily weight gain (ADWG): IM > CM (significant, P = 0.005), but no significant difference between CON and IM / CM.

    Behavioural indicators:

  • Aggressive behaviours:

    • Fighting: CON > IM > CM (significant on days 35–36, P = 0.001; days 35– 38, P < 0.001).

    • Head knocks: control group significantly more than socialised group (days 35–36, P = 0.003; days 35–38, P = 0.001).

  • Social interactions:

    • Oral-nasal contact: CON significantly more than socialised group (days 35–36, P < 0.001), CON > IM > CM (significant on days 35–38, P < 0.001).

    • Mounting: no significant difference (days 35–36), IM significantly lower than the other groups (days 35–38, P = 0.036).

    • No reaction: CM significantly lower than the other groups (days 35–36, P = 0.018; days 35–38, P < 0.001).

    • Avoiding: CM significantly higher than the other groups (days 35–38, P = 0.008).

    • Return approach: CM significantly higher than the other groups (days 35–36, P = 0.001; days 35–38, P < 0.001).

Limitations:
  • The mechanism of randomisation for treatment group allocation was not reported.

  • The study was not blinded.

  • The socialisation group (IM and CM) had more space allowance than the control group (CON) during lactation, which might be significant. 

  • The proportion of familiar piglet to unfamiliar piglet (familiarity ratio) in a pen after regrouping was not specified.

  • There was no baseline for the physiological indicators established prior to regrouping.

  • Behavioural observations were recorded by one observer only.