Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 27;8(3):vetevid-8-3-664. doi: 10.18849/ve.v8i3.664

Schrey et al. (2019).

Population: Breed unknown, piglets, (Germany).
Sample size:

Before weaning: 34 litters (400 piglets).

After weaning: 14 litters (70 piglets).

Intervention details:

Pre-weaning treatment groups:

Group 1 conventional individual housing / control / no socialisation (IH): n = 10 litters (126 piglets). Housing design: littermate-only with sow in a farrowing pen until weaning.

Group 2 group housing / socialisation (GH):  n = 24 litters (274 piglets). Socialisation housing design: five farrowing pens with a central common area which was made accessible after the first piglet can pass through the flexible steps. Socialisation group size: five litters per pen (socialisation group size is the number of litters that interact with one another during lactation).

Study design: Non-randomised controlled trial.
Outcome studied:

Weaning age: day 35.

Regroup condition: IH: n = six litters (30 piglets). GH: n = eight litters (40 piglets).

Five piglets from two unfamiliar litters in the same pre-weaning treatment groups. Balanced by weight and sex.

Post-weaning group size: 10 piglets per group.

Familiarity ratio: 1:1.

Growth performance:

  • Average daily weight gain (ADWG) (days 35, 39 and 63).

    Behavioural indicators:

  • Skin lesion (before weaning vs day 39).

Main Findings (relevant to PICO question)

Growth performance:

  • ADWG: higher daily weight gain in GH than IH (days 35–39, P = 0.003; days 35–63, P = 0.085).

    Behavioural indicators:

  • Skin lesion.

    • IH: Skin lesion significantly increased (days 35–39, P = 0.014).

    • GH: No significant increase (days 35–39).

Limitations:
  • Treatment group allocation method was not stated.

  • The GH had more space allowance than the IH during lactation, which might be significant.

  • The start day of socialisation during lactation was not specified, and based on its description, the start day may have varied in different litters. Socialisation length was unknown.

  • The selection criteria for piglets to proceed to regrouping was not stated (sudden reduction from 400 to 70 piglets).

  • Skin lesions were assessed by one trained observer only.