Table 3.
Logistic regression analysis of RCC risk according to genotype.
| SNPs | Genetic model | OR (95% CI) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| rs1049380 (ITPR2) | Codominant | ||
| T/T | Ref. | ||
| G/T | 1.21 (0.80–1.82) | 0.392 | |
| G/G | 0.60 (0.26–1.41) | 0.238 | |
| Dominant | |||
| T/T | Ref. | ||
| G/T + G/G | 1.08 (0.73–1.61) | 0.705 | |
| Recessive | |||
| T/T + G/T | Ref. | ||
| G/G | 0.56 (0.24–1.29) | 0.172 | |
| rs10771279 (ITPR2) | Codominant | ||
| T/T | Ref. | ||
| C/T | 0.81 (0.53–1.24) | 0.326 | |
| C/C | 0.42 (0.22–0.80) | 0.009 | |
| Dominant | |||
| T/T | Ref. | ||
| C/T + C/C | 0.70 (0.46–1.05) | 0.085 | |
| Recessive | |||
| T/T + C/T | Ref. | ||
| C/C | 0.48 (0.27–0.87) | 0.479 | |
| rs4903064 (DPF3) | Codominant | ||
| T/T | Ref. | ||
| C/T | 1.38 (0.90–2.09) | 0.131 | |
| C/C | 2.55 (1.22–5.48) | 0.013 | |
| Dominant | |||
| T/T | Ref. | ||
| C/T + C/C | 1.52 (1.02–2.27) | 0.037 | |
| Recessive | |||
| T/T + C/T | Ref. | ||
| C/C | 2.22 (1.08–4.56) | 0.030 | |
| rs7579899 (EPAS1) | Codominant | ||
| G/G | Ref. | ||
| A/G | 1.17 (0.76–1.79) | 0.486 | |
| A/A | 1.92 (1.08–3.39) | 0.025 | |
| Dominant | |||
| G/G | Ref. | ||
| A/G + A/A | 1.33 (0.90–1.99) | 0.151 | |
| Recessive | |||
| G/G + A/G | Ref. | ||
| A/A | 1.78 (1.05–3.02) | 0.033 | |
| rs35252396 (PVT1) | Codominant | ||
| AC/AC | Ref. | ||
| AC/CG | 1.27 (0.80–2.00) | 0.319 | |
| CG/CG | 1.37 (0.79–2.36) | 0.264 | |
| Dominant | |||
| AC/AC | Ref. | ||
| AC/CG + CG/CG | 1.29 (0.84–1.98) | 0.240 | |
| Recessive | |||
| AC/AC + AC/CG | Ref. | ||
| CG/CG | 1.16 (0.73–1.84) | 0.481 |
OR are adjusted for age and sex.
p-values <0.05 are shown in italics. p-values <0.01 (Bonferroni-corrected significance) are shown in bold.