Skip to main content
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2001 Mar;80(3):1384–1394. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76111-5

Association of a fluorescent amphiphile with lipid bilayer vesicles in regions of solid-liquid-disordered phase coexistence.

A Pokorny 1, P F Almeida 1, W L Vaz 1
PMCID: PMC1301330  PMID: 11222299

Abstract

The effects of solid-fluid phase separations on the kinetics of association of a single-chain fluorescent amphiphile were investigated in two different systems: pure DMPC (dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine) and a 1:1 mixture of DMPC and DSPC (distearoylphosphatidylcholine). In pure DMPC vesicles, solid (s) and fluid (l(d)) phases coexist at the phase transition temperature, T(m), whereas a 1:1 mixture of DMPC and DSPC shows a stable s-l(d) phase separation over a large temperature interval. We found that in single-component bilayers, within the main phase transition, the experimental kinetics of association are clearly not single-exponential, the deviation from that function becoming maximal at the T(m). This observation can be accounted for by a rate of desorption that is slower than desorption from either fluid or solid phases, leaving the rates of insertion unchanged, but a treatment in terms of stable fluid and solid domains may not be adequate for the analysis of the association of an amphiphile with pure DMPC vesicles at the T(m). In DMPC/DSPC mixtures with solid-fluid phase coexistence, association occurs overall faster than expected based on phase composition. The observed kinetics can be described by an increase in the rate of insertion, leaving the desorption rates unchanged. The fast kinetics of insertion of the amphiphile into two-phase bilayers in two-component vesicles is attributed to a more rapid insertion into defect-rich regions, which are most likely phase boundaries between solid and fluid domains. A two-component mixture of lipids that shows a stable phase separation between l(d)-s phases over a large temperature interval thus behaves very differently from a single-component bilayer at the T(m), with respect to insertion of amphiphiles.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (135.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahmed S. N., Brown D. A., London E. On the origin of sphingolipid/cholesterol-rich detergent-insoluble cell membranes: physiological concentrations of cholesterol and sphingolipid induce formation of a detergent-insoluble, liquid-ordered lipid phase in model membranes. Biochemistry. 1997 Sep 9;36(36):10944–10953. doi: 10.1021/bi971167g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Almeida P. F., Vaz W. L., Thompson T. E. Percolation and diffusion in three-component lipid bilayers: effect of cholesterol on an equimolar mixture of two phosphatidylcholines. Biophys J. 1993 Feb;64(2):399–412. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81381-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BARTLETT G. R. Phosphorus assay in column chromatography. J Biol Chem. 1959 Mar;234(3):466–468. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berg H. C., Purcell E. M. Physics of chemoreception. Biophys J. 1977 Nov;20(2):193–219. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(77)85544-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown D. A., Rose J. K. Sorting of GPI-anchored proteins to glycolipid-enriched membrane subdomains during transport to the apical cell surface. Cell. 1992 Feb 7;68(3):533–544. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90189-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clerc S. G., Thompson T. E. Permeability of dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine/dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine bilayer membranes with coexisting gel and liquid-crystalline phases. Biophys J. 1995 Jun;68(6):2333–2341. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80415-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Coelho F. P., Vaz W. L., Melo E. Phase topology and percolation in two-component lipid bilayers: a monte Carlo approach. Biophys J. 1997 Apr;72(4):1501–1511. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78798-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Corvera E., Mouritsen O. G., Singer M. A., Zuckermann M. J. The permeability and the effect of acyl-chain length for phospholipid bilayers containing cholesterol: theory and experiment. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992 Jun 30;1107(2):261–270. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(92)90413-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cruzeiro-Hansson L., Mouritsen O. G. Passive ion permeability of lipid membranes modelled via lipid-domain interfacial area. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988 Sep 15;944(1):63–72. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(88)90316-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Edidin M. Lipid microdomains in cell surface membranes. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1997 Aug;7(4):528–532. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(97)80117-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hinderliter A. K., Almeida P. F., Biltonen R. L., Creutz C. E. Membrane domain formation by calcium-dependent, lipid-binding proteins: insights from the C2 motif. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998 Dec 10;1448(2):227–235. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4889(98)00146-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hwang J., Gheber L. A., Margolis L., Edidin M. Domains in cell plasma membranes investigated by near-field scanning optical microscopy. Biophys J. 1998 May;74(5):2184–2190. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77927-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jerala R., Almeida P. F., Biltonen R. L. Simulation of the gel-fluid transition in a membrane composed of lipids with two connected acyl chains: application of a dimer-move step. Biophys J. 1996 Aug;71(2):609–615. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79261-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Knoll W., Ibel K., Sackmann E. Small-angle neutron scattering study of lipid phase diagrams by the contrast variation method. Biochemistry. 1981 Oct 27;20(22):6379–6383. doi: 10.1021/bi00525a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kraayenhof R., Sterk G. J., Sang H. W. Probing biomembrane interfacial potential and pH profiles with a new type of float-like fluorophores positioned at varying distance from the membrane surface. Biochemistry. 1993 Sep 28;32(38):10057–10066. doi: 10.1021/bi00089a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lisanti M. P., Scherer P. E., Tang Z., Sargiacomo M. Caveolae, caveolin and caveolin-rich membrane domains: a signalling hypothesis. Trends Cell Biol. 1994 Jul;4(7):231–235. doi: 10.1016/0962-8924(94)90114-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mabrey S., Sturtevant J. M. Investigation of phase transitions of lipids and lipid mixtures by sensitivity differential scanning calorimetry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Nov;73(11):3862–3866. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.11.3862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Marsh D., Watts A., Knowles P. F. Evidence for phase boundary lipid. Permeability of Tempo-choline into dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine vesicles at the phase transition. Biochemistry. 1976 Aug 10;15(16):3570–3578. doi: 10.1021/bi00661a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mayor S., Maxfield F. R. Insolubility and redistribution of GPI-anchored proteins at the cell surface after detergent treatment. Mol Biol Cell. 1995 Jul;6(7):929–944. doi: 10.1091/mbc.6.7.929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Melo E. C., Lourtie I. M., Sankaram M. B., Thompson T. E., Vaz W. L. Effects of domain connection and disconnection on the yields of in-plane bimolecular reactions in membranes. Biophys J. 1992 Dec;63(6):1506–1512. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81735-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Muñiz M., Riezman H. Intracellular transport of GPI-anchored proteins. EMBO J. 2000 Jan 4;19(1):10–15. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.1.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Papahadjopoulos D., Jacobson K., Nir S., Isac T. Phase transitions in phospholipid vesicles. Fluorescence polarization and permeability measurements concerning the effect of temperature and cholesterol. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1973 Jul 6;311(3):330–348. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(73)90314-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pokorny A., Almeida P. F., Melo E. C., Vaz W. L. Kinetics of amphiphile association with two-phase lipid bilayer vesicles. Biophys J. 2000 Jan;78(1):267–280. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76590-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Simons K., Ikonen E. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature. 1997 Jun 5;387(6633):569–572. doi: 10.1038/42408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sugár I. P., Biltonen R. L., Mitchard N. Monte Carlo simulations of membranes: phase transition of small unilamellar dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine vesicles. Methods Enzymol. 1994;240:569–593. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(94)40064-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sugár I. P., Thompson T. E., Biltonen R. L. Monte Carlo simulation of two-component bilayers: DMPC/DSPC mixtures. Biophys J. 1999 Apr;76(4):2099–2110. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77366-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Thompson T. E., Sankaram M. B., Biltonen R. L., Marsh D., Vaz W. L. Effects of domain structure on in-plane reactions and interactions. Mol Membr Biol. 1995 Jan-Mar;12(1):157–162. doi: 10.3109/09687689509038512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Vaz W. L. Diffusion and chemical reactions in phase-separated membranes. Biophys Chem. 1994 May;50(1-2):139–145. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(94)85026-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Vaz W. L. Percolation properties of two-component, two-phase phospholipid bilayers. Mol Membr Biol. 1995 Jan-Mar;12(1):39–43. doi: 10.3109/09687689509038493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Welti R., Glaser M. Lipid domains in model and biological membranes. Chem Phys Lipids. 1994 Sep 6;73(1-2):121–137. doi: 10.1016/0009-3084(94)90178-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Xiang T. X., Anderson B. D. Phase structures of binary lipid bilayers as revealed by permeability of small molecules. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998 Mar 6;1370(1):64–76. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(97)00244-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES