Skip to main content
. 2002 Jul 10;6(5):439–446. doi: 10.1186/cc1538

Table 2.

A comparison of the time required to reach a diagnosis and proper treatment between the Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT™) and conventional monitoring equipment

Simulation scenarios Time to diagnosis (s) Number of clinicians unable to provide a correct diagnosis Time to treatment (s) Number of clinicians unable to provide a correct treatment
Scenario 1
Tension pneumothorax LSTAT 80 (61–154) 0/12 99 (83–195) 1/12
CM 60 (50–107) 1/13 85 (61–111) 1/13
P 0.3645 0.1495
Scenario 2
Adult respiratory distress syndrome LSTAT 215 (66–300) 4/12 300 (248–300) 6/12
CM 193 (137–300) 5/13 300 (156–300) 6/13
P 0.6438 0.4464
Scenario 3
Cardiac tamponade LSTAT 149 (67–300) 3/13 149 (82–300) 3/13
CM 117 (100–273) 3/12 152 (122–280) 3/12
P 0.8848 0.6639
Scenario 4
Pulseless ventricular tachycardia LSTAT 49 (42–73) 0/13 60 (50–99) 0/13
CM 41 (38–44) 0/12 44 (41–49) 0/12
P 0.0317 0.0018

Data are presented as medians and 25th to 75th interquartile ranges. CM, conventional monitors.