Skip to main content
. 2026 Mar 26;8(Suppl 1):22. doi: 10.1186/s42836-026-00376-9

Table 1 (Abstract O31).

Overview of UKA cases requiring conversion to TKA*

Case Sex Age (yr) Body mass index (kg/m2) Time to revision (yr) Reason for Failure Procedure
1 Female 53.3 29.8 12.1 Polyethylene wear Revision TKA
2 Female 61.2 28.7 11.9 Unexplained pain Revision TKA
3 Female 67.9 25.0 1.6 Aseptic loosening Revision TKA
4 Female 69.0 24.1 8.0 Aseptic loosening Revision TKA
5 Male 65.1 27.8 13.0 Polyethylene wear Revision TKA
6 Female 67.6 22.5 5.9 Aseptic loosening Revision TKA
7 Female 57.0 24.7 12.6 Aseptic loosening Revision TKA
8 Female 68.1 25.4 9.4 Polyethylene wear Revision TKA
9 Female 61.9 28.8 11.9 Aseptic loosening Revision TKA
10 Female 54.3 25.6 10.0 Polyethylene wear Revision TKA
11 Female 74.3 30.3 10.5 Polyethylene wear Revision TKA
12 Female 69.7 31.2 6.7 Progression of lateral osteoarthritis Revision TKA
15 Female 77.2 26.6 6.4 Aseptic loosening Revision TKA

*Summary of patients who underwent revision following UKA, including demographic characteristics and reasons for revision