TABLE 2.
Parameters obtained by alternative EXAFS-simulation approaches for the intact Mn complex
Mn-O (N)
|
Mn-O (N)
|
Mn-Mn
|
Mn-Mn
|
Mn-Ca (Mn)
|
Mn-O (N/C)
|
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sample | Fit no. | nfree | NI | RI [Å] |
![]() |
NII | RII [Å] |
![]() |
NIII | RIII [Å] |
![]() |
NIV | RIV [Å] |
![]() |
NV | RV [Å] |
![]() |
NVI | RVI [Å] |
![]() |
RF [%] | ![]() |
PS II in S1-state | 1 | 8 | 5.5* | 1.86 | 0.029 | 1.30 | 2.71 | 0.005 | 3.4 | 3.62 | 0.007 | 17.8 | 63 | |||||||||
2 | 8 | 5.5* | 1.86 | 0.029 | 1.19 | 2.71 | 0.005 | 1.4 | 3.66 | 0.014 | 20.6 | 85 | ||||||||||
3 | 8 | 5.5* | 1.86 | 0.029 | 1.22 | 2.71 | 0.005 | 1.2 | 3.19 | 0.026 | 25.5 | 130 | ||||||||||
4 | 9 | 4.9† | 1.86 | 0.021 | 0.6† | 2.16‡ | 0.014‡ | 1.21 | 2.71 | 0.005 | 3.2 | 3.62 | 0.006 | 9.8 | 22 | |||||||
5 | 9 | 4.9† | 1.86 | 0.021 | 0.6† | 2.16‡ | 0.014‡ | 1.17 | 2.71 | 0.005 | 1.1 | 3.67 | 0.010 | 12.4 | 35 | |||||||
6 | 9 | 4.9† | 1.86 | 0.021 | 0.6† | 2.16‡ | 0.014‡ | 0.99 | 2.71 | 0.005 | 1.2 | 3.19 | 0.026 | 19.2 | 84 | |||||||
7 | 10 | 4.9† | 1.86 | 0.021 | 0.6† | 2.16‡ | 0.014‡ | 1.0* | 2.71 | 0.004 | 1.0* | 3.13 | 0.032 | 2.9 | 3.62 | 0.007 | 8.0 | 17 | ||||
8 | 10 | 4.9† | 1.86 | 0.021 | 0.6† | 2.16‡ | 0.014‡ | 1.0* | 2.71 | 0.005 | 0.5* | 3.07 | 0.004* | 0.5* | 3.29 | 0.004* | 3.0 | 3.63 | 0.008 | 5.2 | 7 | |
180 min heated | 9 | 3 | 6.2 | 2.16 | 0.014 | 16.2 | 32 |
In the last row, the fit results obtained for the fully disassembled state (180 min of heating) are shown. EXAFS phase functions were calculated for the absorber-backscatterer combinations shown in the first row; the elements given in parenthesis could also contribute to the respective backscattering shell. Meaning of symbols: Ni, apparent coordination number (per Mn); Ri, mean distance; 2σi2, Debye-Waller parameter; nFree, number of independently varied parameters, RF, filtered R-factor calculated for FT distances ranging from 1.2 to 3.6 Å as a measure for the fit quality (represents deviations in percent). The parameter in the last row represents the so-called goodness of fit, a quadratic error which is corrected for the increase in fit-quality due to an increased number of variable simulation parameters (Teo, 1986; nmax = 16, see text).
Simulation parameters which were fixed (no variation by the curve-fit algorithm).
In fit 4-8, NI and NII were variable, but coupled to yield a sum of 5.5.
RII and 2σII2 were determined from a fit of the spectrum obtained after 180 min of heating and fixed in the fits of the control spectrum.