TABLE 5.
tcool,1 | ↔ | tcool,2 | θ0 | kθ | p261 | p262 | p263 | p264 | p265 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
400 | ↔ | 800 | 0.98 | 0.61 | 0.13 | 0.51 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
800 | ↔ | 1600 | 0.49 | 0.33 | 0.66 | 0.12 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.91 |
400 | ↔ | 1600 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.26 | 0.46 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.91 |
WT/POP0 | ↔ | WTH/POP0 | 0.42 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 0.00 | 0.35 |
WT/POP0 | ↔ | WT/POP− | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.03 |
WT/POP0 | ↔ | N10/POP0 | 0.20 | 0.55 | 0.32 | 0.59 | 0.30 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
Respective p-values for various pairs of annealing sets, as estimated by applying the appropriate bootstrap hypothesis tests described in the Methods section. The mean test was used for the spontaneous tilt θ0, the variance test for the tilt stiffness kθ, the probability test for helicity pi of residue i (i = 261,…,265). The upper three lines list pairs obtained for system WT/POP0 with various annealing lengths; the lower three lines list comparisons of the 400 ps WT/POP0 annealing set with the specified sets.