Skip to main content
. 2025 Feb 4;19(2):jjaf022. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf022

Table 1.

Patient characteristics.

Control (N = 200) Case (N = 87) P-value
Age at first surveillance endoscopic procedure
Median (Q1, Q3)
42.6 (29.5, 56.8) 50.6 (35.7, 64.2) .002a
Sex
Female
95 (47.5%) 32 (36.8%) .093b
IBD duration at first surveillance, y
Median (Q1, Q3)
5.1 (0.7, 15.8) 10.7 (3.6, 23.4) .003a
Years on surveillance
Median (Q1, Q3)
5.2 (1.8, 8.9) 6.8 (3.0, 9.6) .126a
Years followed pre-HD
Median (Q1, Q3)
2.7 (0.0, 6.9) 5.0 (2.3, 7.6) <.001a
Years followed in HD
Median (Q1, Q3)
6.5 (1.4, 7.4) 3.7 (0.3, 5.7) <.001a
Total number of surveillance endoscopic procedures
Median (Q1, Q3)
3.0 (2.0, 5.0) 4.0 (3.0, 7.0) <.001a
Nonconventional lesions over all follow-up
 0 126 (63.0%) 31 (35.6%)
 1 34 (17.0%) 13 (14.9%)
 2 16 (8.0%) 13 (14.9%)
 3 5 (2.5%) 10 (11.5%)
 4+ 19 (9.5%) 20 (23.0%) <.001c
Conventional lesions over all follow-up
 0 153 (76.5%) 52 (59.8%)
 1 28 (14.0%) 17 (19.5%)
 2 8 (4.0%) 9 (10.3%)
 3 4 (2.0%) 5 (5.7%)
 4+ 7 (3.5%) 4 (4.6%) .009c

Abbreviations: HD, high-definition; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease.

aKruskal-Wallis rank sum test.

bPearson’s Chi-squared test.

cTrend test for ordinal variables.