Skip to main content
. 2025 Feb 4;19(2):jjaf022. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf022

Table 3.

Adjusted Cox model for effect of nonconventional versus conventional lesions on the development of colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Effect Location level
HR (95% CI) P-value
Cumulative conventional lesion counta 2.18 (1.34, 3.52) .002
Cumulative nonconventional lesion counta 2.28b (1.59, 3.26) <.001
Age (per 5 years) 1.11 (1.01, 1.23) .04
Female 0.89 (0.45, 1.73) .72
Year of first surveillance endoscopic procedure 1.14 (1.03, 1.26) .01
Surveillance endoscopic procedure prior to 2007 0.75 (0.33, 1.70) .48
IBD duration, years 1.00 (0.99, 1.02) .87
PSC 3.62 (1.23, 10.67) .02
Cholangiocarcinoma 1.89 (0.21, 10.34) .46
Liver transplant 0.97 (0.21, 4.51) .97
History of invisible low/high-grade dysplasia 32.8 (14.3, 75.3) <.001
History of other invisible dysplasia 2.20 (0.95, 5.11) .07

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; PSC, primary sclerosing cholangitis.

aSquare-root transformation was used. 

bThe effect of nonconventional lesions versus conventional lesions was HR 1.05 (95% CI 0.57, 1.92; P = .89).