Skip to main content
. 2026 Mar 28;16:10796. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-34320-9

Table 4.

Detection evaluation results (%) of each model against the proposed DCBS-YOLO.

Methods Cr In Pa Ps Rs Sc mAP@0.5 (%)
YOLOv5n 17.2 74.7 95.8 91.8 48.0 75.5 67.1
YOLOv5s 21.8 79.2 95.5 90.4 54.3 82.2 70.5
YOLOv5m 33.2 81.7 96.4 90.7 56.5 88.2 74.4
YOLOv5l 26.0 79.5 97.3 90.9 55.0 88.8 72.9
YOLOv5x 28.8 78.5 96.8 85.9 64.5 88.8 73.8
YOLOv8n 23.9 79.9 97.0 95.0 53.5 85.1 72.4
YOLOv8s 22.2 72.8 95.9 93.4 55.1 88.9 71.3
YOLOv8m 23.2 81.0 97.5 95.1 56.8 79.8 72.2
YOLOv8l 24.1 80.1 97.5 87.1 56.0 85.6 71.7
YOLOv8x 31.6 77.3 96.9 90.0 57.4 89.2 73.7
YOLOv9t 21.1 79.7 96.5 94.6 52.5 82.9 71.2
YOLOv9s 28.6 79.1 97.1 93.7 59.8 91.5 74.9
YOLOv9m 33.7 81.0 95.7 93.2 59.4 85.1 74.6
YOLOv9c 33.5 81.2 97.3 94.6 61.2 82.1 75.0
YOLOv9e 29.8 81.3 97.8 85.8 55.8 85.8 72.7

The Proposed

DCBS-YOLO

25.8 81.6 98.4 95.3 60.8 92.5 75.7