Skip to main content
. 2026 Apr 1;36:11. doi: 10.1186/s12610-026-00310-8

Table 7.

The changes in testicular stiffness and volume reported in the literature on varicocele

Study Elastography technique Sample size (testes) Testicular Stiffness in Varicocele Testicular Volume in Varicocele
Erdogan et al SWE VC group(n = 50); contralateral normal testes group(n = 46); control group(n = 104) Increased Decreased
Li K et al Strain elastography VC I group(n = 66); VC II group(n = 60); VC III group(n = 70); control group(n = 50) Increased Decreased
Salbas et al SWE VC group(n = 78); contralateral normal testes group(n = 60); control group(n = 152) Increased Decreased
Turna et al SWE VC group(n = 116), VC group subdivided in two groups: normospermic and oligospermic group; control group(n = 58) Increased; higher stiffness observed in oligospermic subgroup Decreased
Jedrzejewski et al SWE VC group(n = 30); contralateral testes group(n = 30) Increased only in cases with > 20% testicular volume reduction; no significant difference when volume reduction was 0%–20% Decreased
Alperen et al SWE VC group(n = 55); control group(n = 69) Decreased No significant difference
Dede et al ARFI VC group(n = 30); control group(n = 30) Decreased No significant difference
Baleato–Gonzalez et al SWE VC group(n = 19); contralateral normal testes group(n = 13); control group(n = 44) No significant difference No significant difference
Yüzkan et al SWE VC group(n = 66); contralateral normal testes group(n = 50); control group(n = 116) No significant difference Decreased

ARFI Acoustic radiation force impulse, SWE Shear wave elastography