Table 2.

Characteristics of participating clinics

Characteristic	All (n, %)	Medium-level (n, %)	Larger(n, %)
No. of health facilities	10 (100%)	7(70%)	3(30%)
Management Type
Government	7(70%)	4(57%)	3(100%)
Faith-based	3(30%)	3(43%)	0(0%)
Location
Urban	8(80%)	5(71%)	3(100%)
Rural	2(20%)	2(29%)	0(0%)
No. of providers trained in offering Cervical Cancer screening and treatment (TIBA)	260(100%)	152(58%)	108(42%)
No. of providers offering Cervical Cancer screening and treatment (TIBA)	46(100%)	24(52%)	22(48%)

We had one lower-level facility, which was grouped with medium-level facilities based on comparable characteristics