TABLE 3.
Model A
|
Model B
|
Model C
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hypothetical cases | BS | LC | BS | LC | BS | LC |
Case 1: CDC25_1p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Case 1: CDC25_2p | 27 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 82 | 3 |
Case 2: wee1_1p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Case 2: wee1_2p | 6 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
Case 3: CAK_1p | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - |
Case 3: CAK_2p | 14 | 0 | - | - | - | - |
Case 4: CDC25_1p + wee1_1p | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Case 4: CDC25_2p + wee1_2p + CAK_1p | 577 | 35 | 121 | 0 | 437 | 20 |
Case 5d: positive + negative feedback | 33 | 611 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 595 |
Case 5b: positive + negative feedback | 40 | 557 | 36 | 100 | 53 | 2275 |