Skip to main content
. 2004 Jun;86(6):3923–3939. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.103.022087

TABLE 2.

Error propagation analysis for the E-FRET formula

Variable or parameter
ΔEapp [%] (Absolute error of Eapp in response to 10% input error)
Eapp = 0% Eapp = 10% Eapp = 30%
IDD 1.7 2.2 2.8
IDA 2.7 3.0 3.3
IAA 0.89 0.72 0.43
a 0.89 0.72 0.43
d 1.9 1.5 0.92
G 0 0.82 2.0
Actual per-pixel error* 2.4 2.5 2.6
Actual pixel noise 1.4 1.2 1.1

Error propagation analysis was performed on Eq. 12 and Eq. 13 by introducing a 10% disturbance into each variable (IDD, IDA, IAA) or parameter (a, d, G) of the formulae. The resulting deviation of Eapp is shown for three levels of Eapp as indicated. The unit of error is the percent of energy transfer. The starting parameters were a = 0.077, d = 0.647, G = 3.50, IDD = 750, IAA = 3000, IDA = 716.1 (for Eapp = 0%), IDA = 1008 (for Eapp = 10%), and IDA = 1845 (for Eapp = 30%). Intensities are expressed in the relative camera response units. These values represent typical readings during actual experiments except for the input errors.

*

The actual per-pixel accumulated error of Eapp was calculated based on 2 × 2 binning and input errors specified in the Methods for the dual-camera system.

The actual pixel-to-pixel noise is contributed only by the variables (IDD, IDA, IAA).