Skip to main content
. 2004 Sep;87(3):1578–1595. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.042739

TABLE 1.

A set of parameter values that give a good fit between mean-field theory and the SB data for the six mutant strains

m 0 1 2 3 4
E0(1, m) 0.864 0.310 −0.147 −8.02 −20.1
E0(2, m) 4.69 −1.04 −7.97
E1(1, m) 30 2.10 1.41 0.763 0.740
E1(2, m) 30 30 30
Inline graphic(1, m) 2.43 21.3 18.0 0.0314 6.49 × 10−7
Inline graphic(1, m) 3.7 × 109 128.9 85.4 204.2 727.1
Inline graphic(2, m) 0.257 32539 24.9
Inline graphic(2, m) 2.5 × 1010 9.8 × 1017 7.7 × 1017
EJ(q,q′)
q′ = 1
q′ = 2
q = 1 0 −4.40
q = 2 −6.41 −1.38

The local parameters for each receptor type, E0, E1 (in unit of thermal energy) and Inline graphic (in unit of μM), are listed for each relevant receptor type characterized by (q, m), where q = 1 for Tar and q = 2 for Tsr, and m is the receptor methylation level. Values of Inline graphic(q, m) = Inline graphic exp(E1E0) are also included for reference; the effective dissociation constant is a complicated combination of Inline graphic and Inline graphic and it also depends on the actual activity. The coupling constants EJ(q, q′) (listed in the lower table) depend on the receptor species labels q and q′ for two neighboring receptors.