Skip to main content
. 2004 Sep;87(3):1805–1814. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.103.032078

TABLE 2.

Summary of dynamic properties

N C. stiff (kN m−2) Ev (kN m−2) fEv (Hz) Ee (kN m−2) Pmax (W/m−3) fmax (Hz) r3 (s−1)
IFI 10 367 ± 28 142 ± 12 125 ± 4 343 ± 23 81 ± 8 145 ± 4 1140 ± 66
IFI-3a 10 283 ± 34* 134 ± 24 78 ± 5 267 ± 28 56 ± 9 121 ± 4 797 ± 55
EMB 7 74 ± 13 51 ± 10 18 ± 0.9 58 ± 10 4.4 ± 0.9 19 ± 0.8 111 ± 7
EMB, 34 6 70 ± 12 42 ± 8 17 ± 1.1 61 ± 9 3.6 ± 0.8 18 ± 1.1 108 ± 4
EMB-3b 7 164 ± 18§ 80 ± 12§ 31 ± 1.7§ 146 ± 14§ 12 ± 1.9§ 34 ± 0.9§ 295 ± 27§
EMB-3b, 157 6 158 ± 11§ 83 ± 6§ 27 ± 1.7§ 134 ± 11§ 11 ± 0.8§ 30 ± 0.7§ 312 ± 8§
IFI-2h 5 135 ± 9§ 34 ± 2 132 ± 4§ 132 ± 9§ 22 ± 2§ 152 ± 6§ 1169 ± 58§

Complex stiffness (C. stiff) and elastic modulus (Ee) values for IFI and IFI-3a were measured at the frequency (fmax) at which IFI generated maximum power (Pmax). Ee and C. stiff values for EMB, EMB-IC, and IFI-2h were measured at the specific fmax of each fiber type. fEv is the average frequency at which the viscous modulus amplitude was lowest. −Ev is the average minimum amplitude for the viscous modulus, and r3 is the rate constant for phase 3 of force recovery after a quick lengthening step (see Methods). EMB, 34 is a second EMB line created by an independent transformation event, and EMB-3b, 157 is a second EMB-3b line created by an independent transformation event. All values are means ± SE.

*

t-test, p = 0.073 for IFI compared to IFI-3a.

Statistically different from IFI (t-test, p < 0.05).

t-test, p = 0.047 for IFI compared to IFI-3a.

§

Statistically different from EMB and EMB, 34 (t-test, p < 0.05).