Skip to main content
. 2004 Oct;87(4):2131–2147. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.039511

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Comparison of analytical solutions using the improved boundary condition (left, “Improved BC”) or a linear approximation between electrodes (right, “Linear BC”) and the numerical solution for w′ = 0.2. (A) Electric potential and field components at the electrode boundary, z′ = 0, demonstrate a closer match between the numerical model and the improved BC analytical model compared to the linear BC model. (B) Comparison between electric field magnitude from numerical solution Inline graphic and analytical solutions |E′|, where contour shading indicates relative error: Inline graphic The improved BC solution (left) deviates from the numerical solution by <3% for a majority of the solution space (dark red/orange), whereas the linear solution (right) deviates by >10% throughout most of the volume (white). Similar accuracy is achieved with models of different geometry.