Skip to main content
. 2026 Mar 20;18:1776882. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2026.1776882

Table 5.

Functional connectivity value of the PD-FOG NI group and HCs in FOG time between different ROIs.

ROI–ROI pair PD-FOG (n = 28) HCs (n = 28) Statistical value p-value Cohen’s d
PMC-MTG 0.22 ± 0.21 0.05 ± 0.11 3.760 0.001 1.000
S1-MTG 0.20 ± 0.27 0.05 ± 0.13 2.599 0.013 0.704
S1-PFC 0.29 ± 0.22 0.15 ± 0.18 2.442 0.018 0.697
M1-MTG 0.23 ± 0.29 0.01 ± 0.14 3.702 0.001 0.961
M1-PFC 0.28 ± 0.26 0.12 ± 0.15 2.819 0.007 0.748
M1-DLPFC 0.32 ± 0.37 0.10 ± 0.26 2.621 0.011 0.685
MTG-PFC 0.22 ± 0.21 0.06 ± 0.11 3.571 0.001 0.941
MTG-SAC 0.19 ± 0.31 0.02 ± 0.19 2.442 0.019 0.659
MTG-DLPFC 0.23 ± 0.28 0.01 ± 0.22 3.194 0.002 0.873
PFC-SAC 0.28 ± 0.26 0.11 ± 0.18 2.898 0.005 0.762
PFC-DLPFC 0.32 ± 0.27 0.17 ± 0.20 2.392 0.020 0.630
SAC-DLPFC 0.34 ± 0.38 0.10 ± 0.34 2.475 0.016 0.665