Skip to main content
. 2026 Mar 20;14:1725144. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1725144

Table 2.

Health literacy-stratified analysis of barriers and facilitators to treatment adherence.

Barrier/Facilitator Low health literacy
(n = 538)
No. (%)
Moderate health literacy
(n = 539)
No. (%)
High health literacy
(n = 538)
No. (%)
OR (95% CI)a P for interaction
Treatment barriers
High side effect concern 237 (44.1) 194 (36.0) 151 (28.1) 0.51 (0.39–0.67) <0.001
Significant embarrassment 189 (35.1) 151 (28.0) 112 (20.8) 0.49 (0.36–0.67) <0.001
High cost concern 264 (49.1) 219 (40.6) 174 (32.3) 0.50 (0.38–0.65) <0.001
Privacy concerns 156 (29.0) 118 (21.9) 89 (16.5) 0.48 (0.34–0.68) 0.002
Treatment facilitators
Strong partner support 367 (68.2) 398 (73.8) 423 (78.6) 1.72 (1.24–2.39) 0.01
High treatment self-efficacy 243 (45.2) 289 (53.6) 348 (64.7) 2.23 (1.69–2.95) <0.001
Trust in healthcare providers 312 (58.0) 341 (63.3) 378 (70.3) 1.71 (1.26–2.32) 0.005
Telehealth acceptance 345 (64.1) 367 (68.1) 407 (75.7) 1.73 (1.26–2.37) 0.01
Information-seeking behaviors
Actively seeks health information 189 (35.1) 259 (48.1) 356 (66.2) 3.64 (2.74–4.84) <0.001
Uses digital health resources 145 (27.0) 221 (41.0) 329 (61.2) 4.27 (3.15–5.78) <0.001
Participates in support groups 86 (16.0) 129 (23.9) 194 (36.1) 2.95 (2.12–4.11) <0.001

OR indicates odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. a Odds ratio for high vs. low health literacy, adjusted for age, education, and clinical factors. Statistical Analysis: Multinomial logistic regression to identify differential barrier patterns across health literacy levels, with interaction terms.