Skip to main content
. 2004 Oct 22;88(2):1166–1190. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.043612

TABLE 6.

Knowledge-based energies of a representative lexitropic polyamide bound to sequence-modified DNA

Energies
Clustering
Local density
Global density
Sequence* single-base substitution Comp_ID* Steric hindrance ETot ΔETot ETot ΔETot ETot ΔETot
bdd002
CCAGTACTGG 62.3 38.2 35.8
 ---C------ (S1a) 5.0 −0.3 0.9
 ----A----- (S1b) 10.2 10.2 8.5
 -----T---- (S1c) 8.0 5.6 7.9
 ------G--- (S1d) § 3.2 2.8 3.6
 ---A------ (S1m) 21.8 25.4 22.2
 ----C----- (S1n) § 7.7 −0.7 1.1
 -----C---- (S1o) § 0.4 0.5 1.6
 ------A--- (S1p) 28.4 22.7 25.0
 ---T------ (S1w) 25.7 21.4 23.1
 ----G----- (S1x) § 8.5 2.5 4.8
 -----G---- (S1y) § 4.7 −3.1 −0.2
 ------T--- (S1z) 22.6 25.3 23.2
*

Only one of the two DNA strands is listed for each drug-DNA structure. Comp_ID is the identification code of the computer substitution experiment referenced in the text.

Steric hindrance that is predicted to occur in the drug design (Kielkopf et al., 1998a,b, 2000; White et al., 1998), is not detected. Such situations occur only when Im·Py drug pairs are used to recognize G·C basepairs.

Basepair substitution results are inconsistent with predictions, i.e., the basepair change neither increases the total energy nor introduces steric hindrance.

§

Steric hindrance exists between the ligand and modified DNA.