Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr 8;88(6):3888–3904. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.055996

TABLE 1.

Static free energies from PB/LRA and MDFE

Residue* State Inline graphic Inline graphic MDFE
ASP 95.5(0.3) 116.8(0.3) 124.2(2.2)
Thioredoxin Asp-26 Midpoint 50.5(0.7) 59.5(0.4) 44.8(2.0)
ASPH 28.7(0.4) 10.7(0.3) −16.6(4.6)
ASP 130.0(0.8) 136.1(0.5) 142.3(2.4)
RNase A Asp-14 Midpoint 70.0(0.7) 67.4(0.3) 56.8(3.2)
ASPH 11.5(1.0) 0.3(0.6) −17.9(4.2)
ASP 131.9(0.5) 136.8(0.2) 143.5(0.8)
Thioredoxin Asp-20 Midpoint 60.5(0.3) 63.0(0.1) 57.0(1.2)
ASPH −9.3(0.3) −9.6(0.1) −19.0(0.4)
ASP 139.6(0.4) 143.3(0.2) 144.6(1.4)
Model Midpoint 66.4(0.1) 67.7(0.1) 58.4(0.8)
ASPH −6.0(0.2) −7.8(0.1) −19.3(1.4)
*

Free energies in kcal/mol. The signs correspond to the ASP → ASPH direction (protonation). The protein dielectric constant is Inline graphic Mean values over 100–200 MD structures are reported. The statistical uncertainty of the PB static free energies (in parentheses) was determined by the method of Flyvbjerg and Petersen (1989). A correction has been added to the static terms to permit comparison with the MDFE derivatives (see text; it is, respectively, +2.0, −1.0, and −4.1 kcal/mol at the protonated (ASPH), midpoint, and charged (ASP) end state).

Free-energy derivatives from a molecular dynamics free-energy simulation (MDFE) starting from the ionized state ASP (“backward” run); see Table 1 in (Simonson et al., 2004).

The model compound (Fig. 1) is an aspartic acid with N-acetyl and N-methylamide blocking groups.