Table 4.
Hypothesis test results.
| Path | Unstd | SE | CR | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC1 | < –- | PC | 1.000 | |||
| PC2 | < –- | PC | 1.001 | 0.065 | 15.479 | *** |
| PC3 | < –- | PC | 1.225 | 0.076 | 16.031 | *** |
| PC4 | < –- | PC | 1.151 | 0.070 | 16.426 | *** |
| PC5 | < –- | PC | 1.137 | 0.076 | 14.899 | *** |
| IN1 | < –- | IN | 1.000 | |||
| IN2 | < –- | IN | 1.075 | 0.115 | 9.355 | *** |
| IN3 | < –- | IN | 1.223 | 0.127 | 9.648 | *** |
| IN4 | < –- | IN | 1.128 | 0.124 | 9.129 | *** |
| CU1 | < –- | CU | 1.000 | |||
| CU2 | < –- | CU | 0.892 | 0.059 | 15.136 | *** |
| CU3 | < –- | CU | 0.841 | 0.062 | 13.523 | *** |
| HNSM1 | < –- | HNSM | 1.000 | |||
| HNSM2 | < –- | HNSM | 1.103 | 0.087 | 12.707 | *** |
| HNSM3 | < –- | HNSM | 1.114 | 0.093 | 11.932 | *** |
| HNSM4 | < –- | HNSM | 0.940 | 0.090 | 10.393 | *** |
| HNSM5 | < –- | HNSM | 0.987 | 0.089 | 11.110 | *** |
| HNSM6 | < –- | HNSM | 1.067 | 0.092 | 11.598 | *** |
| PU5 | < –- | PU | 1.000 | |||
| PU4 | < –- | PU | 0.895 | 0.069 | 13.058 | *** |
| PU3 | < –- | PU | 1.016 | 0.068 | 14.994 | *** |
| PU2 | < –- | PU | 1.025 | 0.070 | 14.539 | *** |
| PU1 | < –- | PU | 1.027 | 0.069 | 14.854 | *** |
| PEU1 | < –- | PEU | 1.000 | |||
| PEU2 | < –- | PEU | 1.036 | 0.082 | 12.620 | *** |
| PEU3 | < –- | PEU | 0.932 | 0.071 | 13.063 | *** |
| PEU4 | < –- | PEU | 0.992 | 0.072 | 13.703 | *** |
| UI3 | < –- | UI | 1.000 | |||
| UI2 | < –- | UI | 0.969 | 0.085 | 11.390 | *** |
| UI1 | < –- | UI | 0.866 | 0.084 | 10.293 | *** |
***Significant at the 0.001 level.