Skip to main content
. 2026 Feb 27;9(2):457–466. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2025-0103

Table 2.

The Impact of Medical Representative Interaction Frequency on Physicians’ Guideline Understanding, Implementation, and Perspectives.

Variable Total
(n = 1203)
Frequent interaction
(n = 82)
Moderate interaction
(n = 930)
Rare interaction
(n = 191)
Awareness and understanding about the GL, n (%)
 Be aware of the GL publication and understand its contents 240 (20.0) 31 (37.8) 194 (20.9) 15 (7.9)
 Be aware of the publication of the GL but not understand its contents 694 (57.7) 42 (51.2) 539 (58.0) 113 (59.2)
 Be unaware of the publication of the GL 269 (22.4) 9 (11.0) 197 (21.2) 63 (33.0)
Changes after GL compliance, n (%)
 Decreased frequency of visits with MR 426 (35.4) 38 (46.3) 334 (35.9) 54 (28.3)
 Decreased frequency of in-hospital briefings 400 (33.3) 42 (51.2) 312 (33.6) 46 (24.1)
 Decreased frequency of out-of-hospital events 426 (35.4) 33 (40.2) 351 (37.7) 42 (22.0)
 Content of the information provided by the MR became more superficial than the past 311 (25.9) 26 (31.7) 259 (27.9) 26 (13.6)
Publications of Guidelines and other regulations, n (%)
 Agree 79 (6.6) 9 (11.0) 52 (5.6) 18 (9.4)
 Partly agree 246 (20.5) 14 (17.1) 180 (19.4) 52 (27.2)
 Neutral 238 (19.8) 8 (9.7) 169 (18.2) 61 (31.9)
 Partly disagree 341 (28.4) 23 (28.1) 285 (30.7) 33 (17.3)
 Disagree 299 (24.9) 28 (34.2) 244 (26.2) 27 (14.1)

GL: guideline; MR: medical representative.