Skip to main content
. 2026 Jan 27;76(765):e275–e283. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2025.0174

Table 2. Prevalence ratios of asymptomatic presentation compared with symptomatic presentation in general practice for patients with diagnostics initiated by the GP (N = 369).

Characteristic Patient, n Adjusteda,b prevalence ratio (95% CI)
Follow-up status
 Active 152 Reference
 Completed 199 1.2 (0.9 to 1.7)
 Missing 18
Sex
 Female 258 Reference
 Male 111 0.8 (0.5 to 1.1)
Age (years)
 18–54 49 1.6 (1.0 to 2.2)
 55–64 73 1.1 (0.7 to 1.6)
 65–74 111 1.2 (0.8 to 1.7)
 ≥75 136 Reference
Educational levelc
 Low 107 0.9 (0.6 to 1.3)
 Medium 170 Reference
 High 92 1.3 (0.9 to 1.7)
Cohabitation status
 Cohabitating 204 Reference
 Living alone 165 0.9 (0.7 to 1.2)
Comorbidity leveld
 Low 274 Reference
 Medium 81 0.8 (0.5 to 1.1)
 High 14 0.4 (0.1 to 1.6)

aCrude estimates were similar to adjusted estimates and, therefore, omitted from the table.bComorbidity level was adjusted for educational level and age. Educational level and cohabitation status were adjusted for age. Follow-up, age, and sex were not adjusted.cAccording to the International Standard Classification of Education, divided into low (<10 years), medium (10–15 years), and high (>15 years).dAccording to the Charlson Comorbidity Index score, calculated based on diagnosis codes registered in the Danish National Patient Register in the 10 years preceding a recurrence diagnosis (excluding cancer-related diagnoses), divided into low (score = 0), medium (score = 1–2), and high (score ≥ 3). Bold indicates statistical significance, P≤0.05. CI = confidence interval.