Table 2. Comparative performance of optical sensors for wearable sweat pH monitoring.
| Sensor type | Sensing mechanism | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| SERS | Raman spectral shift | Label-free detection; ultra-high sensitivity; excellent molecular specificity; minimal sample volume | Requires Raman spectrometer; high cost; limited portability; not suitable for long-term continuous monitoring |
| Fluorescence | Fluorescence intensity/wavelength shift | High sensitivity and selectivity; rapid response; capable of detecting small pH variations | Requires excitation source and optical filters; higher power consumption; susceptible to ambient light interference |
| Colorimetric | pH-responsive dyes | Low cost; lightweight; simple readout; no complex electronics; suitable for continuous and outdoor monitoring | Moderate sensitivity; discrete data; limited temporal resolution; affected by lighting conditions |