Skip to main content
. 2026 Apr 9;16(21):18904–18920. doi: 10.1039/d5ra10052f

Table 2. Comparative performance of optical sensors for wearable sweat pH monitoring.

Sensor type Sensing mechanism Advantages Limitations
SERS Raman spectral shift Label-free detection; ultra-high sensitivity; excellent molecular specificity; minimal sample volume Requires Raman spectrometer; high cost; limited portability; not suitable for long-term continuous monitoring
Fluorescence Fluorescence intensity/wavelength shift High sensitivity and selectivity; rapid response; capable of detecting small pH variations Requires excitation source and optical filters; higher power consumption; susceptible to ambient light interference
Colorimetric pH-responsive dyes Low cost; lightweight; simple readout; no complex electronics; suitable for continuous and outdoor monitoring Moderate sensitivity; discrete data; limited temporal resolution; affected by lighting conditions