Skip to main content
. 2026 Mar 2;17:3354. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-70113-y

Table 1.

Table summarizing important plasma parameters at different times for both drive configurations

Drive Single Double
t (ns) 5 10 15 10 15
ne (cm−3) 9 × 1018 9 × 1018 8 × 1018 3 × 1019 2.5 × 1019
ni (cm−3) 3 × 1018 3 × 1018 3 × 1018 1.1 × 1019 9 × 1018
T (eV) 120 50 10
B (kG) 40–230
uturb (cm s−1) ≲1.8 × 106 ≲8 × 105 ≲4 × 105 ≲3 × 106 ≲2.6 × 106
cs (cm s−1) 8 × 106 5 × 106 2 × 106
nesim (cm−3) 2.2 × 1019 2.4 × 1019 2.15 × 1019
nisim (cm−3) 6.7 × 1018 9.3 × 1018 7.1 × 1018
Tsim (eV) 412 106 80
Bsim (kG) 38 77 40
cssim (cm s-1) 1.7 × 107 1.1 × 107 8.4 × 106
Zc Z0 = 14 14.7 14.6 16.1 15.8
Z0 = 20 20.1 20.1 20.3 20.3
ΔEFermi (keV) Z0 = 14 0.2 0.1 10.3 2.5
Z0 = 20 0.3 0.2 13.1 3.1
ΔELHDI (keV) Z0 = 14 140 60 870 300
Z0 = 20 170 80 1.09 × 103 390

Experimentally measured or inferred values at t = 5, 10 and 15 ns are compared to results from 3D FLASH magnetohydrodynamics simulations1. These values are used to calculate the corrected charge state Zc as well as the expected ΔE according to Eq. (7) and (10), for initial charge states Z0 = 14 and 20 at t = 10 and 15 ns.

1FLASH simulation data was retrieved with the following method. Values are averaged over a 0.95 mm radius cylinder centered between the targets, which extends the extent of the domain. A temperature threshold is used to exclude solid target material. Values are averaged over two runs, with 25J and 35J of laser energy on each target foil, respectively.