Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Apr 11.
Published in final edited form as: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2026 Feb 10;807:153439. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2026.153439

Table 1.

Actin-sliding velocities and Ca+2, Mg+2, actin-stimulated Mg+2 ATPase kinetics of EMB-D509N, EMB-A511D and EMB-D509N-A511D myosins.

Myosin Actin sliding velocity ± SD (μms−1) Basal Ca-ATPase ± SD (s−1) Basal Mg-ATPase ± SD (s−1) Actin-stimulated Vmax ± SD (s−1) Km (actin) ± SD (μM)
EMB-D509N (n = 4) 0 5.83 ± 0.87** 0.10 ± 0.01*,† 0.62 ± 0.07†† 0.20 ± 0.08
EMB-A511D (n = 5) 0 5.94 ± 0.82** 0.13 ± 0.02*** 0.96 ± 0.15*** 0.10 ± 0.08
EMB-D509N-A511D (n = 4) 0 3.76 ± 0.47 0.06 ± 0.01 0.42 ± 0.06 0.06 ± 0.03
EMB§ 0.7 ± 0.2 (n = 3) 4.47 ± 2.20 (n = 6) 0.08 ± 0.04 (n = 7) 1.10 ± 0.38 (n = 7) 0.29 ± 0.18 (n = 7)

Statistically significant difference relative to EMB-D509N-A511D:

*

= p < 0.05;

**

= p < 0.01;

***

= p < 0.001.

Statistically significant difference of EMB-D509 N relative to EMB-A511D:

†

= p < 0.05;

††

= p < 0.01.

Values calculated by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (GraphPad Prism version 10.4.2). Primary data are found in Appendix A. Supplementary data (ATPase data and statistics).

§

Data for EMB isoform [5] provided for comparison purposes.