Skip to main content
. 2026 Mar 30;13:1781153. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1781153

Table 2.

Results of guideline quality evaluation.

Included literature Percentage of standardization by domain ≥60% of the number of fields ≥30% of the number of fields Recommended level
Scope and purpose Participants Rigor of formulation Clarity of presentation Usefulness of the guide Editorial independence
Madden (8) 100 60.4 87.5 90.4 66.7 100 6 6 A
Sandroni (6) 100 95.2 83.9 93.8 54.2 83.3 5 6 B
Nolan (7) 95.2 96.4 92.8 87.5 85.7 66.7 6 6 A
Cariou (9) 76.4 82.5 93.4 78.7 89.4 73.1 6 6 A
Nolan (24) 96.1 95.8 94.7 90.2 89.6 79.3 6 6 A
Geocadin (25) 98.8 61.9 73.2 87.5 54.2 87.5 5 6 B
Donnino (26) 83.3 90.4 72.9 94.4 41.7 81.2 5 6 B