Skip to main content
. 2026 Mar 30;13:1781153. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1781153

Table 4.

Quality evaluation results of expert consensus.

Items Andrews (10) Emergency Physician Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association (27) Neurocritical Care Expert Committee of the Neurosurgery Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association (28) Cardiac Critical Care & Brain Protection Group (29) Chiu (30) Emergency Physicians’ Branch of Chinese Medical Association (31)
(1) Whether a clear source of point of view is presented? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
(2) Whether the opinion comes from influential experts in the field? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
(3) Whether the arguments presented are centered on the interests of the people involved in the study? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
(4) Whether the stated conclusions are based on the results of the analysis? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
(5) Whether other existing literature has been consulted and accurately indexed? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
(6) Whether there are any inconsistencies between the points presented and previous literature? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes