Table 4.
Quality evaluation results of expert consensus.
| Items | Andrews (10) | Emergency Physician Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association (27) | Neurocritical Care Expert Committee of the Neurosurgery Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association (28) | Cardiac Critical Care & Brain Protection Group (29) | Chiu (30) | Emergency Physicians’ Branch of Chinese Medical Association (31) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Whether a clear source of point of view is presented? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| (2) Whether the opinion comes from influential experts in the field? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| (3) Whether the arguments presented are centered on the interests of the people involved in the study? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| (4) Whether the stated conclusions are based on the results of the analysis? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| (5) Whether other existing literature has been consulted and accurately indexed? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| (6) Whether there are any inconsistencies between the points presented and previous literature? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |