Skip to main content
NPJ Parkinson's Disease logoLink to NPJ Parkinson's Disease
. 2026 Mar 5;12:94. doi: 10.1038/s41531-026-01287-x

Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, depleted in the Parkinson’s disease microbiome, improves motor deficits in α-synuclein overexpressing mice

Anastasiya Moiseyenko 1,2,, Giacomo Antonello 2,3,4, Aubrey M Schonhoff 1,2, Joseph C Boktor 1,2, Kaelyn Long 2,3,4, Blake Dirks 5, Anastasiya D Oguienko 1, Alexander Viloria Winnett 1,6, Patrick Simpson 1, Dorsa Daeizadeh 5, Rustem F Ismagilov 1,7, Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown 5,8, Nicola Segata 2,4, Levi D Waldron 2,3,4, Sarkis K Mazmanian 1,2,
PMCID: PMC13077053  PMID: 41786774

Abstract

Gut microbiome composition is altered in Parkinson’s disease (PD), the fastest-growing neurological condition, that is characterized by neurodegeneration, motor dysfunction, and is frequently accompanied by gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. Notably, microbial taxa with anti-inflammatory properties are consistently depleted in PD patients compared to controls. To explore whether specific gut bacteria may be disease-protective, we assembled a microbial consortium of 8 human-associated taxa that are reduced in individuals with PD. Treatment of α-synuclein overexpressing (Thy1-ASO) mice, an animal model of PD, with this consortium improved motor and GI deficits. A single bacterial species from this consortium, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, was sufficient to correct gut microbiome deviations in Thy1-ASO mice, induce anti-inflammatory immune responses, and promote protective colonic gene expression profiles. Accordingly, oral treatment with F. prausnitzii robustly ameliorated motor and GI deficits and reduced α-synuclein aggregates in the brain. These findings support the emerging hypothesis of functional contributions by the microbiome to PD outcomes, and embolden the development of potential probiotic therapies to treat motor and non-motor symptoms.

Subject terms: Microbiology, Neurology, Neuroscience

Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder, affecting over 10 million people globally and 1% of individuals over the age of 601,2. The diagnosis of PD is rapidly rising due to increased lifespan and potentially to certain environmental exposures3. Synucleinopathies such as PD, Lewy body dementia, and multiple system atrophy, among other disorders, are characterized by aggregation of the neuronal protein α-synuclein (αSyn)4. αSyn pathology can lead to inflammation, neuronal dysfunction, and likely to the ultimate death of dopaminergic neurons in the nigrostriatal pathway of the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc), resulting in motor symptoms such as tremors, rigidity, gait impairment, and bradykinesia1,2,5. Current treatments provide symptomatic relief but can have considerable side effects, present dosing challenges, and often lose efficacy over time. There are no disease-modifying drugs for PD2,6.

Although PD is predominantly classified as a brain disorder, a role for non-motor symptoms and peripheral organs dates back over 200 years7. Indeed, 60–80% of PD patients experience gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms—primarily constipation, but also deficits in gastric emptying, abdominal pain, and increased intestinal permeability—that often appear many years before a PD diagnosis8,9. Other non-motor symptoms, including hyposmia, depression, and REM sleep behavior disorder, also manifest in the prodromal phase1012. Braak’s hypothesis, and more recently the “brain-first vs. body-first” hypothesis13,14, postulates that αSyn aggregation may start in peripheral tissues such as the GI tract, spread via the vagus nerve, and eventually reach the brainstem, substantia nigra, and neocortex15. Indeed, injection of αSyn aggregates (as pre-formed fibrils [PFFs] or other pathogenic αSyn species) into the intestines of mice and rats results first in GI symptoms, and eventually leads to neurodegeneration in the brain and motor deficits16,17. Severing the vagus nerve in animals halts propagation of gut-induced αSyn pathology into the brain16 and epidemiologic data suggest that truncal vagotomies may be protective against the development of PD in humans18,19. Whether PD can originate outside the brain, and potentially in the GI tract, is a timely yet still unresolved question.

Gut microbiome analyses of stool samples have revealed that individuals with PD harbor a distinct microbial profile compared to non-PD controls. PD patients show increased abundance of potential pathobionts and decreased levels of beneficial bacteria including Blautia, Roseburia, and Faecalibacterium species2024. A recurring feature observed across numerous cohorts is loss of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producing bacteria, many of which promote anti-inflammatory pathways2527. While treatments containing Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria have been shown to result in mild clinical improvements2831, these taxa are among the most enriched in the PD patient microbiome20, raising questions about their therapeutic potential in the context of PD. Exploring the efficacy of microbes that are depleted in PD is a more intuitive therapeutic approach, yet it remains largely unexplored.

Multiple metagenomic analyses have found Faecalibacterium prausnitzii to be consistently depleted from the gut microbiome of PD patients20,21,24,3236. F. prausnitzii, a fastidiously anaerobic Gram-positive species, is highly abundant in the ileum and colon of the healthy human gut and is a major producer of the SCFA butyrate37. Its potent anti-inflammatory effects have been documented in models of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)3740. Notably, individuals with IBD show depletion of F. prausnitzii and are at increased risk for developing PD later in life41,42.

Using the transgenic Thy1 α-synuclein overexpressing (“Line 61”) mouse model of PD43 (hereafter referred to as Thy1-ASO), we report that treatment with a defined consortium of eight microbes commonly depleted in PD patients led to modest improvements in PD-like symptoms. One member of the consortium, F. prausnitzii, alone was able to robustly ameliorate motor and GI dysfunction and reduce αSyn accumulation in the brain. Additionally, F. prausnitzii treatment mildly remodeled the gut microbiome of Thy1-ASO mice to more closely resemble that of wild-type (WT) animals. Regulatory T cell (TREG) numbers and production of the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-10 (IL-10) were increased in F. prausnitzii-treated intestinal tissues. Furthermore, F. prausnitzii supplementation increased colonic expression of gene pathways associated with tissue repair and regeneration. Our findings demonstrate that treatment of Thy1-ASO mice with a commensal bacterium that is depleted in PD patients improves molecular and behavioral outcomes, providing conceptual validation for the development of microbial strategies to treat PD.

Results

A human gut microbial consortium ameliorates symptoms in Thy1-ASO mice

To investigate the potential therapeutic benefits of gut microbes, we used transgenic Thy1-ASO mice that overexpress the wild-type human SNCA gene under a modified Thy1 promoter, driving αSyn protein expression in many neuronal subtypes throughout the body and brain43. Thy1-ASO mice phenocopy clinical features of human synucleinopathies, including PD, such as αSyn pathology in the gut and brain, neuroinflammation, mitochondrial deficits, and progressive age-dependent deficits in motor and GI function43,44. While Thy1-ASO mice display loss of striatal dopamine neuron terminals and a decline in dopamine only at 14 months of age, phosphorylated-S129 α-synuclein (p-αSyn), a pathogenic modification that correlates with disease measures45, and proteinase K-resistant αSyn aggregates (akin to Lewy bodies in human tissue) are present as early as 5 months of age43,44.

We assembled a defined microbial consortium composed of eight culturable type strains that represent the closest relatives of bacterial taxa depleted in stool samples across multiple human PD cohorts, which we termed “benCom-PD” for beneficial commensals for PD (Fig. 1A). Taxa for the consortium were primarily selected from two comprehensive studies of the PD gut microbiome: (1) Boktor et al. (2023)36 for its multi-cohort analysis and (2) Wallen et al. (2022)24 as it is the largest PD gut microbiome study to date. BenCom-PD was intragastrically administered to specific pathogen-free (SPF; standard laboratory microbiome) Thy1-ASO mice twice weekly for approximately 15 weeks (Fig. 1B). At 20 weeks of age, motor and GI function were evaluated using a battery of standard behavioral tests. Mice receiving benCom-PD exhibited improvements in motor performance compared to vehicle-treated controls, with reduced latency in the adhesive removal test, indicating improved fine motor coordination, and significantly less pronounced hindlimb clasping, reflecting reduced striatal dysfunction46 (Fig. 1C, Supplementary Fig. 3A). We did not observe effects in the beam traversal, pole descent, or wire hang tests (Supplementary Fig. 1A, Supplementary Fig. 3A). GI symptoms also improved; namely, benCom-PD-treated mice expelled a rectally-inserted glass bead more rapidly than controls and produced fecal pellets with higher scores on the Bristol stool scale, suggesting alleviation of constipation-like symptoms (Fig. 1C, Supplementary Fig. 1B). Accordingly, motor and GI function improvements in mice treated with benCom-PD were accompanied by a reduction in levels of pS129-αSyn in the striatum (Fig. 1D, E), but not in the substantia nigra (Supplementary Fig. 1C, D). No differences were observed in the abundance of aggregated αSyn measured by dot blot, a semi-quantitative measurement of relative protein aggregate levels (Supplementary Fig. 1E–H). Together, these findings reveal that supplementation of Thy1-ASO mice with specific commensal microbes, commonly depleted in humans with PD, improves symptoms and pathology associated with PD.

Fig. 1. Treatment with benCom-PD improves motor and GI function and reduces pS129-αSyn in the striatum.

Fig. 1

A Composition of the benCom-PD consortium consisting of 8 taxa that are reduced in the PD microbiome. B Animal treatment and testing timeline. C Improvements in motor and GI function assays with benCom-PD treatment of Thy1-ASO mice compared to controls, tested at 20 weeks. n = 11–15. Points represent individual animals; bars represent standard error of the mean. Representative images (D) and quantification (E) of Western blots for phosphorylated-S129-α-synuclein in striatal tissue. n = 3–6. Points represent individual animals; bars represent standard error of the mean. See Supplementary Fig. 10 for uncropped blot images. Behavior data in C analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Conover–Iman post-hoc test with Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) correction; protein data in E analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test. *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001; ****p ≤ 0.0001. WT wild-type, Thy1-ASO-CNTRL Thy1-human α-synuclein overexpressing control, benCom-PD beneficial commensal consortium for Parkinson's disease, pS129-αSyn phosphorylated-S129-alpha-synuclein.

F. prausnitzii has robust therapeutic effects on motor symptoms and synucleinopathy

Across published studies of PD patients curated in the BugSigDB database46, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii emerges as the most consistently reduced microbial taxon, reported as decreased in 16 independent studies and never as increased (Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Data 1). Additionally, F. prausnitzii has well-documented immunomodulatory properties and is effective in ameliorating experimental colitis47. We therefore identified it as a particularly compelling candidate for further investigation among the taxa represented in benCom-PD. We treated animals with F. prausnitzii mono-cultures for 15 weeks, using the same dosing regimen established for benCom-PD (Fig. 2A) and assessed motor and GI function. F. prausnitzii-treated mice showed significant improvements in the adhesive removal and hindlimb clasping tests compared to vehicle-treated Thy1-ASO mice (Fig. 2B, Supplementary Fig. 3B), similar to the effects observed with benCom-PD. Animals treated with F. prausnitzii alone further exhibited an improved ability to cross a challenging beam, a test of motor coordination, as reflected by reduced crossing time and fewer errors per step (paw slips) (Fig. 2B, Supplementary Figs. 2A, 3B, and 4). GI function was also improved following F. prausnitzii treatment, marked by decreased time required to expel a rectally-inserted glass bead and improved Bristol stool scale scores following treatment (Fig. 2B, Supplementary Figs. 2B and 4). While we did not detect changes in levels of pS129-αSyn in brain tissues (Supplementary Fig. 2C–F), supplementation with F. prausnitzii reduced aggregation of αSyn in the substantia nigra (Fig. 2C, D), but not in the striatum (Supplementary Fig. 2G, H), of Thy1-ASO mice relative to vehicle-control Thy1-ASO mice. These findings demonstrate that treatment with F. prausnitzii, a single microbe found to be depleted in the PD patient gut microbiome, is sufficient to markedly improve disease-associated outcomes in the Thy1-ASO mouse model.

Fig. 2. Treatment with F. prausnitzii mono-culture ameliorates motor and GI symptoms and reduces αSyn aggregates in the substantia nigra.

Fig. 2

A Animal treatment and testing timeline. B Improvements in motor and GI function assays with F. prausnitzii treatment in Thy1-ASO animals compared to controls, tested at 20 weeks. n = 23–29. Points represent individual animals, compiled from two independent cohorts; bars represent the standard error of the mean. Representative images (C) and quantification (D) of dot blots for aggregated α-synuclein in the substantia nigra. n = 11–15. Points represent individual animals, compiled from two independent cohorts; bars represent the standard error of the mean. See Supplementary Fig. 11 for uncropped blot images. Behavior data in B analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Conover–Iman post-hoc test with Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) correction; protein data in D analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test. *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001; ****p ≤ 0.0001. WT wild-type, Thy1-ASO-CNTRL Thy1-human α-synuclein overexpressing control, F. prausnitzii Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, αSyn α-synuclein.

F. prausnitzii treatment aligns the Thy1-ASO microbiome to more closely resemble a WT profile

The fecal microbiome is altered in Thy1-ASO mice and other PD models compared to WT mice4852. Metagenomic analysis revealed that F. prausnitzii treatment remodeled or maintained the gut microbiome of Thy1-ASO mice to more closely resemble that of WT animals, while the composition in untreated Thy1-ASO mice deviated from the other two groups (Fig. 3, Supplementary Fig. 5). At the phylum level, relative abundance profiles appeared largely stable across groups, with no major shifts observed between conditions (Supplementary Fig. 5A). However, at the species genome bin (SGB) level, Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) of Bray–Curtis dissimilarity revealed a separation of the microbiomes of WT and vehicle-treated control Thy1-ASO animals (Fig. 3A), reflecting genotype-associated differences that align with previous findings49,50. Notably, supplementation with F. prausnitzii partially prevented compositional changes in the Thy1-ASO mice (Fig. 3A). Pairwise comparisons of Bray–Curtis dissimilarity showed significant differences between WT and control Thy1-ASO mice (pairwise PERMANOVA FDR = 0.011), as well as between F. prausnitzii-treated Thy1-ASO and control Thy1-ASO animals (pairwise PERMANOVA FDR = 0.020), while microbial compositions of WT and treated Thy1-ASO mice showed less dissimilarity (pairwise PERMANOVA FDR = 0.250) (Fig. 3B). However, measures of observed richness, Shannon diversity, and the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio did not differ significantly between groups (Supplementary Fig. 5B–D). Differential abundance and prevalence analyses identified subtle shifts in multiple taxa, suggesting that a community-wide alteration may underlie the Thy1-ASO microbiome’s increased similarity to the WT profile, rather than pronounced alterations in specific taxa (Fig. 3C). Interestingly, presence of F. prausnitzii was not identified in the metagenomes, likely due to its weak ability to individually colonize the mouse gut5355.

Fig. 3. The gut microbiome of Thy1-ASO mice is mildly remodeled upon treatment with F. prausnitzii.

Fig. 3

A Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity of fecal microbiome composition of each group at the genus level. Percentages in brackets represent variance explained by each axis. See Supplementary Data 2 for the complete table of values. B Boxplot of pairwise dissimilarity at the genus level. Statistical significance was calculated using pairwise permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) with Benjamini–Hochberg-adjusted false discovery rate (FDR) across multiple pairwise comparisons. See Supplementary Data 3 for the complete table of values. C Differential abundance and/or prevalence of the top 15 species-level genome bins (SGBs) in F. prausnitzii-treated Thy1-ASO mice compared to vehicle-treated Thy1-ASO controls. Analysis was performed in MaAsLin3 on log2-transformed relative abundance values scaled between 0 and 1 with no further adjustments. SGB nomenclature was enriched using the Genome Taxonomy Database provided in MetaPhlAn v4.1.1 (see Supplementary Data 4 and 5 for full taxonomy). D Mediation analysis of the first three microbiome principal coordinates as mediators of the effect of F. prausnitzii treatment on the beam traversal errors/step and bead expulsion assays. Effect sizes (β) and 95% confidence intervals are shown. Full circles indicate a p-value ≤ 0.05, empty circles indicate p > 0.05. Refer to Supplementary Data 6 and 7 for full mediation analysis data. WT wild-type, Thy1-ASO Thy1-human α-synuclein overexpressing, F. prausnitzii Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, SGB species-level genome bin, ACME average causal mediation effect, ADE average direct effect, Prop. proportion.

To determine whether the microbiome changes we observed play a role in the motor and GI symptom improvements seen with treatment, we conducted a mediation analysis with F. prausnitzii treatment as the predictor and altered microbiome composition as a potential mediator (Fig. 3D). As functional outcomes, we selected errors/step in beam traversal and time to bead expulsion, as these were the most robust and disease-relevant effects among the motor and GI function assays. Mediation analysis revealed that F. prausnitzii administration had a significant direct influence on both behavioral outcomes, with an insignificant indirect effect, reflected by an average causal mediation effect (ACME) close to zero. These findings suggest that the physiological outcomes were not mediated by overall microbiome alterations, as approximated by the first three principal coordinates of Bray–Curtis dissimilarity, but rather influenced directly by F. prausnitzii. Together, our results demonstrate that F. prausnitzii is sufficient to drive behavioral improvements and contributes to a mild remodeling or maintenance of the gut microbiome profile in Thy1-ASO mice to more closely resemble that of WT animals.

F. prausnitzii alters the immune landscape in treated animals

Probiotic treatment with F. prausnitzii suppresses intestinal and systemic inflammation in mouse models of colitis, arthritis, and during testing of anti-cancer drugs47,5658. Here, flow cytometric analysis of Thy1-ASO mice receiving F. prausnitzii revealed that treatment led to a significant increase in CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ TREG cell numbers in the mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs) (Fig. 4A, B and Supplementary Figs. 6, 7). TREG deficiencies have been implicated in PD and its associated mouse models5961. TREG expansion was accompanied by elevated levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in proximal large intestinal tissue, as measured by multiplex bead assay (Fig. 4C). These findings demonstrate that F. prausnitzii exerts immunomodulatory effects on adaptive immune cell populations in Thy1-ASO mice.

Fig. 4. F. prausnitzii supplementation induces anti-inflammatory processes in gut immune compartments.

Fig. 4

Representative flow cytometry plots (A) and quantification (B) of activated CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells in mesenteric lymph nodes. n = 3–5. C IL-10 concentration in colon tissue as measured by multiplex bead assay. Data are compiled from two independent cohorts. n = 14–17. Points represent individual animals, bars represent the standard error of the mean. Data analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test. ns not significant; *p ≤ 0.05. WT wild-type, Thy1-ASO Thy1-human α-synuclein overexpressing, F. prausnitzii Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, IL-10 interleukin-10.

Despite the alterations in the immune profile and shifts in the gut microbiome (see Fig. 3) observed in F. prausnitzii-treated animals, we did not detect differences in the levels of volatile fatty acids, including measurable SCFAs, in fecal, cecal, or serum samples from Thy1-ASO-treated mice (Supplementary Fig. 8A–C). Fermentation pathway analysis of metagenomic data confirmed no changes in abundance of genes associated with SCFA metabolite production pathways across experimental conditions (Supplementary Fig. 8D). This outcome is in contrast to previous studies reporting increases in SCFAs following F. prausnitzii supplementation56,62,63, though at least one other study similarly found no effect64. While the therapeutic effects of F. prausnitzii in Thy1-ASO mice do not appear to be mediated by SCFAs, further mechanistic studies with knockouts of bacterial (butyrate production) or mouse (SCFA receptors) genes are needed.

F. prausnitzii supplementation remodels the gene expression profile of the large intestine

To gain insight into potential molecular mechanisms of F. prausnitzii-mediated protection, we performed bulk RNA sequencing of the proximal large intestine, which revealed significant (p = 2.00E−04) gene expression differences between experimental groups (Fig. 5A). Compared to control (vehicle-treated) Thy1-ASO mice, F. prausnitzii supplementation altered expression of several immune-related genes linked to PD (Fig. 5B, E). The gene encoding transferrin receptor (Tfrc), whose transcription was upregulated in colon tissue from F. prausnitzii-treated animals, is essential for iron uptake and supports T and B cell proliferation65. TFRC and transferrin (TF) are reduced in the temporal cortex and substantia nigra of PD patients, and TF injections ameliorate 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) mouse model outcomes6668. CCL5, or RANTES, is a chemokine that is elevated in the serum of PD patients69,70, and its gene (Ccl5) was downregulated in mice treated with F. prausnitzii. Cd8a, which encodes a protein expressed on cytotoxic T cells, was also downregulated following F. prausnitzii supplementation. CD8+ cytotoxic T cells have been found to infiltrate the brain in PD models and are elevated in the peripheral blood of patients52,71,72. Thus, in the gut tissue of F. prausnitzii-treated Thy1-ASO mice, we observed normalized expression of several genes (or their products) previously reported to be altered in the blood and brain of PD patients.

Fig. 5. Host gene expression profiles in the large intestine are modulated by F. prausnitzii supplementation.

Fig. 5

A Principal component analysis of gene expression profiles in the large intestine. Ellipses indicate 95% confidence intervals. R2 and p-value PERMANOVA statistics are displayed for the experimental condition category using 9999 permutations. B Volcano plot of genes differentially expressed between Thy1-ASO-Control and Thy1-ASO-F. prausnitzii groups. C Cross-condition scatter plot of genes differentially expressed between WT and Thy1-ASO-Control on the x-axis and Thy1-ASO-F. prausnitzii and Thy1-ASO-Control on the y-axis. Pearson correlation coefficient (Ρ) and p-value of log2-fold change of all genes tested are shown. D Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis showing pathways upregulated in Thy1-ASO-F. prausnitzii tissue vs. Thy1-ASO-Control. E Expression levels of differentially regulated genes of interest. Box plots show normalized gene expression values (size-factor scaled counts) with DESeq2 adjusted p-values between comparisons. ns not significant, WT wild-type, Thy1-ASO Thy1-human α-synuclein overexpressing, F. prausnitzii Faecalibacterium prausnitzii.

Comparative analysis of differentially expressed genes revealed a strong positive correlation between differences observed in WT versus Thy1-ASO control mice and those seen in Thy1-ASO F. prausnitzii-treated versus Thy1-ASO control mice (ρ = 0.37, p < 2.2E−16) (Fig. 5C). This correlation reflects a partial restoration of WT-like gene expression patterns, i.e., some genes upregulated in WT compared to Thy1-ASO controls were also upregulated in Thy1-ASO animals following F. prausnitzii treatment. Similarly, select genes downregulated in WT vs. Thy1-ASO controls trended downward following F. prausnitzii administration. These results suggest that probiotic treatment shifts part of the transcriptional profile of Thy1-ASO animals towards that of WT mice. Of note, among the genes that were upregulated in colonic tissue of both WT and Thy1-ASO F. prausnitzii mice compared to Thy1-ASO control animals was transthyretin (Ttr), a gene relevant to PD. Ttr encodes a transporter of thyroid hormones and retinol, and mutations in this gene cause transthyretin amyloidosis, which is characterized by amyloid deposits73. TTR is reduced in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of Lewy body disease and Alzheimer’s disease patients74, and is able to cleave free αSyn in vitro, suggesting a possible neuroprotective role75. Selenoprotein S, or SELENOS, supports protein folding, limits oxidative stress, and localizes to Lewy bodies in PD76. SELENOS activity is dependent on selenium, a trace element whose deficiency has been linked to cognitive decline, and selenium supplementation has shown therapeutic effects in several PD models76,77. Selenos gene expression was slightly downregulated in both WT and F. prausnitzii-treated Thy1-ASO mice, potentially indicating a reduced need for its activity in these conditions.

Gene ontology (GO) analysis indicated significant enrichment in pathways associated with tissue repair and cytoskeletal remodeling in F. prausnitzii-treated Thy1-ASO animals compared to Thy1-ASO control mice (Fig. 5D, Supplementary Fig. 9A). A subset of pathways was also downregulated upon treatment, but these changes were supported by comparatively lower gene counts (Supplementary Fig. 9B). Enrichment of Actin filament-related, wound healing, and muscle contraction pathways are indicative of activation of cellular mechanisms involved in restoring intestinal barrier integrity and repairing gut function. The upregulation of genes involved in immune homeostasis and tissue repair, such as HIF-1a, Edn3, Slc8A3 (NCX3), and Tnfrsf12a (Supplementary Fig. 9A), suggests that F. prausnitzii has therapeutic effects in the intestine of Thy1-ASO animals, though potential gut-to-brain pathways remain to be explored. Collectively, our findings highlight the therapeutic potential of F. prausnitzii in a preclinical model of PD, demonstrating its capacity to ameliorate both behavioral and neuropathological features, while also modulating gut microbiota composition, immune responses, and host gene expression in the Thy1-ASO mouse model.

Discussion

Fewer than 5% of PD cases are caused by monogenic risk, and only about 20% can be attributed to any genetic factor, suggesting that most PD likely arises from environmental exposures or gene–environment interactions. Indeed, pesticides, heavy metals, solvents, air pollution, and other environmental toxicants have been implicated in PD78. Concordant studies have uncovered differences in gut microbiome composition between PD patients and household or population controls32,36,79,80, representing a potential environmental risk. Indeed, the microbiome has profound effects on disease outcomes in several animal models of PD. For example, we and others have demonstrated that pathogenic gut bacterial species can accelerate motor symptoms and brain pathology in PD mouse models8183. A high-fiber diet corrects microbiome alterations in Thy1-ASO mice and prophylactically improves motor deficits via modulation of microglial activation50. Furthermore, fecal microbiome transplants (FMT) from human PD donors into Thy1-ASO mice worsen motor performance compared to FMT from healthy donors81. In addition to animal studies8487, several clinical trials have assessed the safety and efficacy of FMTs in PD, yielding encouraging but inconsistent results that suggest further optimization of treatment strategies may be needed8891.

Here, we investigated, for the first time to our knowledge, whether the reintroduction of microbes depleted in PD could restore physiological balance. Oral administration of a defined microbial consortium composed of taxa consistently depleted in the gut microbiome of multiple PD cohorts improved select features of disease in the Thy1-ASO mouse model. Further, a single member of this consortium, F. prausnitzii, was sufficient to ameliorate both motor and GI function deficits and reduce αSyn aggregation in the brain. F. prausnitzii treatment shifted the microbiome in Thy1-ASO mice closer to a WT profile, exerted immunomodulatory effects, and enhanced intestinal transcriptional programs associated with tissue regeneration. Our findings demonstrate that targeted microbial supplementation can elicit functional improvements in preclinical models and may translate to replenishing microbes that are depleted in PD patients.

Studies show that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs92,93 or anti-TNFα therapy92 may reduce the risk of PD, an effect successfully modeled in mice94,95. Further, administration of fingolimod, which blocks trafficking of immune cells, is also therapeutic in mouse models96. Many of the strains we tested in benCom-PD, beyond F. prausnitzii, also have anti-inflammatory or therapeutic effects in other contexts. Roseburia intestinalis has been shown to inhibit pro-inflammatory interleukin-17 (IL-17) production, promote TREG expansion, and ameliorate colitis in mice9799. A related but less studied bacterium, Roseburia faecis, improves symptoms related to irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in a stress-induced rat model100. Fusicatenibacter saccharivorans and Anaerostipes hadrus are both depleted in patients with colorectal cancer and IBD101104, while Bacteroides ovatus reduces colitis severity in animals through modulation of immunity105,106 and improves immunotherapy response in graft versus host disease models107. Treatment with Eubacterium rectale has also been shown to improve response to anti-PD1 therapy108, and to mitigate intestinal lymphoma in tumor-bearing mice109. Prevotella histicola promotes TREG function and suppresses disease in arthritis110 and multiple sclerosis animal models111. While we largely focus on single-agent treatment with F. prausnitzii herein, benCom-PD or other taxa alone may also have therapeutic value, a possibility which would need to be evaluated in PD mouse models and, ultimately, in clinical studies.

Metagenomic sequencing revealed that treatment with F. prausnitzii modestly, but significantly, remodeled or maintained the fecal microbiome of Thy1-ASO mice, with treatment-associated shifts in overall community structure. Measures of alpha diversity remained largely unchanged across groups, consistent with a selective, rather than global, change in the microbial community by F. prausnitzii. Differential abundance analysis also indicated subtle directed ecological interactions with endogenous microbial populations. Importantly, and consistent with the finding that the effects of F. prausnitzii on microbiome composition appear targeted, mediation analysis suggested that the therapeutic effects of F. prausnitzii are likely to be largely direct rather than mediated by remodeling of the broader microbiome. As we were unable to detect F. prausnitzii colonization in treated animals, and its effects on microbiome structure are subtle, we speculate that beneficial effects result from the transient passage of F. prausnitzii through the GI tract. Accordingly, whether live bacteria are required for the observed outcomes remains unknown.

Following treatment with F. prausnitzii, we observed increased intestinal TREG populations and elevated levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, consistent with prior findings of its capacity to induce immune tolerance40,112,113. While butyrate is a major SCFA produced by F. prausnitzii and has been implicated in TREG development114, we did not detect increased SCFA levels following treatment, indicating that the bacterium’s therapeutic effects in Thy1-ASO mice may be independent of SCFAs and perhaps driven by secreted immunomodulatory molecules such as the microbial anti-inflammatory molecule (MAM)38.

Transcriptomic profiling of colonic tissue revealed that F. prausnitzii shifted the gene expression landscape of PD mice toward that of WT control animals, with enrichment of genes and pathways involved in immune regulation, epithelial repair and regeneration. Thus, F. prausnitzii alters the gene expression profile in this PD mouse model, potentially contributing to its immunomodulatory and therapeutic effects, a hypothesis that remains to be tested.

In prior probiotic treatment studies using PD animal models, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus has shown neuroprotective effects in MPTP-treated mice115,116. Similarly, Lactobacillus plantarum PS128 reduces microglial activation and motor deficits in MPTP-treated117 and rotenone-exposed mice118. Another study reported the ability of Akkermansia muciniphila to ameliorate PD-like symptoms in the MPTP model119. In early clinical work, multi-strain probiotics containing Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Bifidobacterium lactis have demonstrated improvements in constipation30,31. L. plantarum PS128 elicits modest improvements in UPDRS scores, likely mediated by increased plasma dopamine metabolites120. However, meta-analyses emphasize that while commercial probiotics modestly improve GI and motor outcomes, the quality of evidence remains low due to small sample sizes, short treatment durations, and lack of mechanistic biomarkers121. Further, unlike F. prausnitzii, these species have not been shown to be reproducibly reduced in PD patients.

There are several limitations to this study. First, we only tested benCom-PD or F. prausnitzii in a single preclinical model—the Thy1-ASO mouse—which captures several key aspects of PD, including αSyn accumulation and progressive behavioral deficits43, but lacks others, such as overt dopaminergic neuron loss at the ages tested. Additionally, integration of the αSyn transgene on the X chromosome makes expression inconsistent in female mice due to X inactivation, so only male mice were studied. Future studies employing complementary models and including aging (the primary risk factor for PD) will help validate and extend the observations of the current work. Second, although F. prausnitzii improved PD-associated behaviors and corrected certain molecular changes caused by αSyn overexpression, the precise mechanisms underlying its effects remain untested. Whether these improvements are mediated primarily through peripheral immune modulation, direct gut-brain signaling (i.e., vagal or spinal neurons), production of beneficial microbial metabolites, microbiome restoration, or a combination thereof requires further investigation. Finally, our treatment strategy tested a prophylactic approach prior to disease symptom onset; thus, translation to human studies would require identification of at-risk or prodromal PD populations, which the PD research community is advancing, but is not yet reliably achievable.

Our study provides proof-of-concept that targeted restoration of bacterial species that are depleted in PD patients can improve disease-relevant outcomes, supporting the emerging hypothesis that the gut microbiome is a modifiable contributor to PD. Addressing environmental risk factors of PD, such as the gut microbiome, compared to correcting genetic predispositions, offers a likely more tractable therapeutic route. Furthermore, the development of PD-specific, rather than generic, probiotics represents a promising avenue for advancing treatment options.

Methods

Bacterial cultures

Strains were purchased from DSMZ and ATCC and grown and prepared inside an anaerobic chamber (Coy Laboratories) (80% nitrogen, 10% carbon dioxide, and 10% hydrogen) at 37 °C. Roseburia intestinalis (DSMZ14610), Roseburia faecis (DSMZ16840), and Anaerostipes hadrus (ATCC29173) were grown in yeast casitone fatty acids with carbohydrates (YCFAC) media (Anaerobe Systems). Fusicatenibacter saccharivorans (DSMZ26063) and Prevotella histicola (DSMZ19854) were grown in peptone yeast extract broth with glucose (PYG) media (Anaerobe Systems). Bacteroides ovatus (ATCC8483) was grown in Chopped Meat Broth (Anaerobe Systems) and Eubacterium rectale (ATCC33656) was grown in Mega medium122,123. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (DSMZ17677) was grown in chopped meat with carbohydrates (CMC) medium (Anaerobe Systems). For preparing aliquots for intragastric administration (gavage), cultures were grown to an approximate optical density (600 nm) of 1, then spun down and resuspended in sterile 50% glycerol to an approximate colony-forming unit (CFU) density of 108/mL. For benCom-PD, all bacterial cultures were pooled in equal amounts. Aliquots were frozen at −20 °C for short-term storage in cryotubes wrapped with parafilm to protect from oxygen exposure. On the day of gavage, an aliquot was thawed and resuspended in a sterile solution of pre-reduced phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 1.5% NaHCO3. Gavage tubes were set up inside the anaerobic chamber to reduce oxygen exposure and placed into a GasPak box (BD) with an AnaeroPack (MGC) for transportation to the animal facility. Two times a week, animals received a gavage of 100 μL of vehicle (PBS + 1.5% NaHCO3) (WT and Thy1-ASO-Control groups) or bacterial culture (benCom-PD or F. prausnitzii—Thy1-ASO-Treated groups). For a detailed protocol, see 10.17504/protocols.io.81wgboqw1lpk/v1.

Candidate species for the benCom-PD consortium were primarily selected from two comprehensive studies of the PD gut microbiome: Boktor et al. (2023)36 and Wallen et al. (2022)24. These studies revealed three consensus bacterial taxa that are discordant between PD patients and healthy controls (Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Roseburia faecis, and Roseburia intestinalis). Six additional taxa were chosen based on high fidelity taxonomic assignment, the ability to purchase the corresponding type strain, and the ability to culture in the laboratory. These genera were confirmed for depletion in other PD gut microbiome studies (Supplementary Table 1). Of the nine originally selected strains, Blautia wexlerae was difficult to culture in the laboratory and thus was excluded from the final benCom-PD community.

Mice

All animal husbandry and experiments were approved by the Caltech Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Alpha-synuclein overexpressing (Thy1-ASO) male mice were bred by crossing wild-type (WT) BDF1 males with Thy1-ASO females of the BDF1 background that were heterozygous for the Thy1 promoter driving the human alpha-synuclein transgene located on the X chromosome43,124. Mice had a conventional, specific pathogen-free (SPF) microbiome and were housed in microisolator cages with HEPA-filtered ventilation. All animals received irradiated chow (LabDiet 5053) and water ad libitum, and were maintained on a 12 h light–dark cycle. All technical methods were rigorously standardized between the benCom-PD and F. prausnitzii studies to minimize experimental variability.

Motor and gastrointestinal function testing

Motor function test methods were similar to those previously described81,125. All motor and GI function tests were performed between hours 7 and 9 of the light phase, at the same time every day, inside a biosafety cabinet in the same facility. Animals were habituated to the behavior testing room for 1 h prior to the start of motor and GI function experiments. Beam traversal and pole descent training and testing were done together on two consecutive days, with approximately one hour of rest time between each task. After one rest day, testing for wire hang was conducted. Lastly, adhesive removal and hindlimb clasping scoring were performed on the final day. GI function tests were performed the following week, with bead expulsion assayed last.

For the beam traversal assay, four 0.25 m plexiglass beam sections, starting at 3.5 cm width and narrowing to 0.5 cm width, were placed together to form a 1 m beam. The beam was supported by 3 standard-sized mouse cages at the beginning, middle, and end. Animals were placed onto the widest section of the beam and trained to run across the beam towards their home cage, which was placed sideways at the end of the narrowest section, with the open side facing the animal. Mice were given 3 trials on the training day. The first trial was guided, with the home cage being brought close and moved along with the animal to encourage forward progress. The second trial was performed similarly but with less guidance and encouragement. For the third trial, the home cage was returned to the end of the beam, and animals traversed the beam with limited assistance. The next day, animals were tested for their ability to traverse the beam. Timing began once the mouse crossed onto the second (2.5 cm) section of the beam and stopped once one of the forelimbs was inside the home cage. The maximum time of 60 s was recorded for animals that did not finish the assay within the allotted time or fell off the beam on the last (0.5 cm) section. Test day trials were videotaped and later assessed in slow motion for the number of steps and slips (errors) that occurred during the traversal. Slips were counted if at least ¾ of any limb left the beam. Errors per step were not recorded for animals that did not complete the task. For a detailed protocol, see 10.17504/protocols.io.kxygx4znzl8j/v1.

For the pole descent assay, a 0.5 m rod, 1 cm in diameter, attached to a base and wrapped in shelf liner to increase grip, was used to assess the animal’s ability to climb down a pole. Mice were given 1 day of training prior to the test day, on the same days as beam training and testing, with about an hour of rest time between assays. The training day consisted of 3 trials. On the first trial, cagemates were removed, and the pole was placed into the home cage. The animal was placed at the bottom of the home cage with the pole for ~1 min to allow exploration. Then the animal was placed ~⅓ of the way up the pole, facing head down, and allowed to descend. For the second trial, the animal was placed ⅔ of the way up the pole, and for the third trial, at the top of the pole. On the consecutive day, animals were tested for their ability to descend from the top of the pole. Timing started at the moment the animal’s tail was released and ended when one of the hindlimbs touched the base of the pole. The maximum time of 60 s was recorded for animals that slid or fell off the pole apparatus. For a detailed protocol, see 10.17504/protocols.io.8epv5k9mjv1b/v1.

For the wire hang assay, a clean cage with bedding was placed 40 cm underneath a 30 cm × 30 cm wire mesh screen. Animals were placed at the center of the screen and gently flipped head-first until upside down. Timing started once the animal was hanging from the wire screen horizontally and stopped when the animal fell to the bedding underneath or remained hanging for 60 s. For detailed protocol, see 10.17504/protocols.io.6qpvrw62plmk/v1.

For the adhesive removal assay, cagemates were removed from the home cage. A circular ⅜ inch sticker (Tough-Spots—Diversified Biotech/USA Scientific) was placed on the nose bridge of the animal being tested using tweezers. The mouse was released into the home cage, and timing was started. Timing was stopped when the mouse successfully removed the sticker from its nose, with a maximum time of 30 s. For a detailed protocol, see 10.17504/protocols.io.4r3l21objg1y/v1.

For the hindlimb clasping assay, mice were picked up by the tail, with the underside facing the observer, for ~10 s. Rigidity of the movement of hindlimbs was assessed on a scale of 0–3. A score of 0 was given if the animal was able to extend its hindlimbs outward freely, with flexibility and no clasping. A score of 1 was given if the animal had some tendency to clasp its hindlimbs inward, either one or both, but for the majority of the restraint, the limbs were still spread outward and flexible. A score of 2 was given if hindlimbs were clasped inward for the majority of the time, but some movement and flexibility were still present. A score of 3 was given if the hindlimbs were clasped together entirely, with no movement or flexibility126. For a detailed protocol, see 10.17504/protocols.io.eq2ly4n2mlx9/v1.

To measure fecal output, mice were individually placed into empty, bedding-free, standard mouse cages. The number of fecal pellets produced was counted after 15 min.

Following the fecal output assay, remaining fecal pellets were assessed according to the Bristol stool scale: a score of 1 was given for fecal pellets that were small, dry, hard lumps, indicating severe constipation. A score of 2 was given for lumpy, dry, but sausage-like fecal pellets, indicating mild constipation. A score of 3 was given for mildly dry sausage-like pellets with cracks in the surface. A score of 4 was given for smooth, soft, sausage or snake-shaped pellets. Both scores of 3 and 4 are considered normal. A score of 5 was given for soft blobs with clear-cut edges. A score of 6 was given for fluffy pieces with ragged edges, indicating mild diarrhea. Lastly, a score of 7 was given for an entirely liquid consistency, indicating severe diarrhea127. An average score was taken when animals produced fecal pellets of various scores during one fecal output session.

Following fecal output and score assays, 2–3 fecal pellets were collected in pre-weighed tubes. Tube and wet fecal pellet weights were measured, and then pellets were incubated at 65 °C for 24 h. Tubes and dry fecal pellets were re-weighed, and the percentage of water content calculated. For detailed protocols of constipation assays, see 10.17504/protocols.io.6qpvrw6qplmk/v1.

To measure whole gut transit time, animals were gavaged with 150 μL of autoclaved 6% (w/v) Carmine red (Millipore Sigma) and 0.5% methylcellulose (Sigma-Aldrich) solution in water. After 3 h, animals were transferred to empty, bedding-free, standard mouse cages and observed every 30 min up to 8 h for the first red fecal pellet128,129. For a detailed protocol, see 10.17504/protocols.io.rm7vz9yq8gx1/v1.

For the bead expulsion assay, animals were placed into an isoflurane induction chamber on a heating pad in 1 L/min oxygen and a concentration of 3–5% isoflurane until the respiratory rate reached one breath per minute. Animals were then transferred to a nose cone to maintain anesthesia, and a 2 mm glass bead was inserted into the colon 2 cm proximal to the anus using a metal gavage tube with lubricating jelly. Once the animal emerged from anesthesia, it was transferred to an individual empty, bedding-free, standard mouse cage and timed until the bead was expelled, up to 60 min129,130. For a detailed protocol, see 10.17504/protocols.io.n92ld6zn7g5b/v1.

Motor and gastrointestinal function datasets in Figs. 1 and 2 and Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2 were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by a Conover–Iman post-hoc test of multiple comparisons with Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR)131 to correct for multiple testing. Graphs were generated using GraphPad Prism 10 software (http://www.graphpad.com, RRID:SCR_002798). P-values, n values, and standard errors are indicated in figures and legends.

For motor function datasets in Supplementary Fig. 3, analysis was done using statistical models with either a simple right-censored (at 30 or 60 s, depending on the test) LogNormal distribution or a mixture model that accounts for mice not engaging with the task within the allotted time. Analysis was performed using custom Python (https://www.python.org/, RRID:SCR_008394) code (see Key Resources Table for GitHub repository of behavior analyses). All benCom-PD motor function assay data, as well as F. prausnitzii pole descent and adhesive removal assay results, were fit into a simple LogNormal model:

y~LogNormalμ,σ 1

y=y,ify<6060,ify60 for pole descent or y=y,ify<3030,ify30 for adhesive removal, where μ(mu),σ(sigma) are the standard parameters of the LogNormal distribution.

F. prausnitzii beam traversal and wire hang assay data were fit into a right-censored LogNormal mixture model:

y~ωLogNormalμ,σ+1ωδy60 2
y=y,ify<6060,ify60

where ω(omega) is a parameter describing the probability of a subject mouse engaging with the test, μ(mu) and σ(sigma) are standard parameters of the LogNormal distribution, and δy60 is the Kronecker delta function.

The models’ fits were evaluated with a graphical model assessment approach, using Q–Q plots and predictive ECDFs. Parameters were estimated by maximum likelihood, and 10,000 bootstrap replicates were generated to construct confidence intervals for group comparisons.

For datasets in Supplementary Fig. 4, heterogeneity between the two F. prausnitzii experimental cohorts was assessed using Cliff’s delta132 and its 95% confidence interval. Confidence intervals were estimated using bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap resampling (50,000 iterations)133. For each bootstrap sample, Cliff’s delta was recalculated, and the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of the bootstrap distribution were taken as the confidence limits. Cochran’s Q134 and the I² statistic135 were assessed using the following formulas, assuming 1 degree of freedom:

CochransQ=i=1kωi(θiθ^fixed)2 3

where ωi=1υi is the inverse variance weight and θ^fixed=i=1kωiθii=1kωi is the weighted average effect size.

I2=max0,Q1Q*100% 4

where Q is the Cochran’s Q statistic.

An I² value ≤ 20% was taken as indicative of small to moderate heterogeneity across the two cohorts, based on all three pairwise group comparisons.

Protein assays

Following motor and GI function testing, animals were sacrificed and tissues collected. For Western blot assays, 2 mm sections of the substantia nigra and striatum were dissected, flash frozen, and stored at –80 °C until further processing. Brain tissues were lysed using a handheld homogenizer (BT LabSystems) and the Bio-Plex Cell Lysis Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Bio-Rad). Protein concentrations were normalized using the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific). Samples were separated on a 4–20% Tris–Glycine gel (Invitrogen) and transferred onto a 0.45 µm PVDF membrane (Immobilon-P—Merck Millipore Ltd.). To enhance detection of αSyn, membranes were placed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) solution for 30 min136. Blocking was performed using 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20 (TBS-T) for phosphorylated αSyn antibody or 5% nonfat milk in TBS-T for β-actin antibody. Membranes were cut at 25 kDa and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies: Anti-phosphorylated S129 α-Synuclein Rabbit (Abcam Cat# ab51253, RRID:AB_869973, 1:1000) or Anti-β-actin Mouse (Abcam Cat# ab8226, RRID:AB_306371, 1:1000) in the respective blocking buffers. After washing, membranes were incubated with Anti-IgG HRP rabbit or mouse antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 7074, RRID:AB_2099233 and Cat# 7076, RRID:AB_330924, 1:1000) in TBS-T for 1.5 h at room temperature. Signal was detected using the Clarity Western ECL Substrate (Bio-Rad) on a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc imaging system. Densitometry analysis was performed using ImageJ. For a detailed protocol, see 10.17504/protocols.io.x54v92z2ql3e/v1.

For dot blots, homogenized brain tissue samples were diluted to 500 ng/μL of protein and directly spotted onto a 0.45 μm nitrocellulose membrane (Thermo Scientific). Membranes were blocked using 5% nonfat milk in TBS-T and incubated for 1.5 h with Anti-Aggregated α−Synuclein [MJFR-14-6-4-2] Rabbit (Abcam Cat# ab209538, RRID:AB_2714215, 1:1000) at room temperature in blocking buffer. Subsequent steps followed the same procedure as described for Western blot analysis. For a detailed protocol, see 10.17504/protocols.io.261gen2xdg47/v1.

For the multiplex bead assay, proximal large intestine segments (~2 cm) were homogenized in lysis buffer (Bio-Plex Cell Lysis Kit, Bio-Rad) using Lysing Matrix D tubes and a bead beater (MP Biomedicals). Total protein concentrations were quantified and normalized using the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific). Cytokine levels were then measured on the BioPlex 200 platform using the Bio-Plex Pro Mouse Th17 6-plex Assay (Bio-Rad), following the manufacturer’s protocol.

Flow cytometry

Spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes were collected and processed for flow cytometric analysis. Tissues were passed through 70 µm cell strainers, and spleen cells were treated with red blood cell lysing buffer (Hybri-Max—Sigma Aldrich) for 5 min at room temperature. For a detailed isolation protocol, see 10.17504/protocols.io.nm2dc8e. For later intracellular staining, isolated cells were stimulated with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) (50 ng/ml, Sigma Aldrich) and ionomycin (750 ng/ml, Sigma Aldrich) with GolgiPlugTM (1:1000, BD Biosciences) for 4 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. All cells were then blocked using anti-Fcy receptor (anti-CD16/CD32) (clone 93, eBioscience) and labeled with the following fluorescently-conjugated antibodies: CD45 (clone 30-F11, eBioscience), TCRB (clone H57-597, eBioscience), CD4 (clone RM4-5, eBioscience), and CD25 (clone PC61.5, eBioscience) (all at 1:500 concentration). All cells were labeled with Fixable Near-IR LIVE/DEAD Stain Kit (Invitrogen) to distinguish live cells from dead/debris. For intracellular staining, cells were treated using the Foxp3/Transcription Factor Fixation/Permeabilization Kit (eBioscience) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and stained with a fluorescently conjugated antibody against FoxP3 (clone FJK-16s, eBioscience, RRID:AB_763537) at a 1:100 concentration. Data were acquired on a CytoFLEX S Analyzer (Beckman Coulter) and analyzed with FlowJo software (BD, Tree Star, https://www.flowjo.com/solutions/flowjo, RRID:SCR_008520).

Data generated from protein and cellular assays were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test, and graphs were generated with GraphPad Prism 10 software. P-values, n values, and standard errors are indicated in figures and legends.

RNA sequencing

Approximately 1 cm of proximal large intestine was collected, immediately flash-frozen in TRIzol reagent (Zymo Research), and stored at –80 °C. Total RNA was extracted using the Direct-zol RNA MiniPrep Plus Kit (Zymo Research) per the manufacturer’s protocol, which includes an on-column DNase I treatment. Whole gut tissue extracts consisted largely of RNA from epithelial cells, muscle cells, and fibroblasts. RNA quality and concentration were assessed using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer and an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). Libraries were prepared using the ABclonal FAST RNA-seq Library Prep Kit per the manufacturer’s protocol. Pooled libraries underwent 50 base pair, paired-end sequencing at a target depth of 30 million reads per sample on the Illumina NovaSeq X platform. For a detailed protocol, see 10.17504/protocols.io.6qpvry7wogmk/v1.

Raw sequencing reads were aligned to the Mus musculus GRCm36 Primary Assembly reference genome (Release M36 from GENCODE) using STAR aligner v2.7.1 (10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635, RRID:SCR_004463)137 with default parameters. Gene-level read counts were quantified using featureCounts (https://subread.sourceforge.net/featureCounts.html, RRID:SCR_012919)138. Only protein-coding genes with a minimum sum of at least 10 counts across all samples were retained. Normalization and differential gene expression analysis were performed using the DESeq2 package (10.18129/B9.bioc.DESeq2, RRID:SCR_015687)139 in R (v4.3.0, http://www.r-project.org, RRID:SCR_001905). Genes with an adjusted p-value < 0.05 and log2-fold change were considered significantly differentially expressed. Gene ontology and pathway enrichment analyses for differentially expressed genes were conducted using the clusterProfiler package (10.18129/B9.bioc.clusterProfiler, RRID:SCR_016884)140. Gene sets with an adjusted p-value < 0.1 and |log2 fold-change| > 0.2 were analyzed for up- and down-regulated genes separately for each comparison of interest. Data visualization, including volcano plots and principal component analysis (PCA), was performed using ggplot2 (10.32614/CRAN.package.ggplot2, RRID:SCR_014601)141.

Volatile fatty acid measurement

Fecal pellets, cecal contents, and serum were collected and flash frozen on dry ice for later processing. Fecal pellets were collected fresh from live animals at 18 weeks of age. Cecal contents were collected at 23 weeks during tissue collection. For serum isolation, blood was drawn via cardiac puncture or from the trunk into microtubes containing serum gel (Z-gel, Sarstedt AG & Co.), allowed to clot on ice for 30 min, then centrifuged at 10,000 ×g for 5 min. The resulting serum was collected for downstream analysis.

Fecal, cecal, and blood serum volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using sample extracts. For fecal and cecal extracts, deionized water was added to the samples at a ratio of 1 mL of water to 100 mg of sample. For serum extracts, in order to precipitate any proteins in the serum, 2.5 mM H2SO4 was added to samples at a 1:1 ratio. Serum samples were then vortexed briefly and placed at 4 °C for 20 min. All extracts were vortexed at 3200 rpm for 5 min and then centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were filter-sterilized through a 0.22 μm syringe filter. The filtrates were used for HPLC analysis and soluble chemical oxygen demand (sCOD) measurements. Analysis of VFAs was performed on an Agilent 1260 Infinity II (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) diode array detector at 210 nm with a Bio-Rad Aminex HPX-87H column (Cat. #: 1250095) as previously described142,143. Samples were analyzed at a column temperature of 65 °C using 5 mM H2SO4 as a mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min for 80 min. A standard curve was generated using a 10 mM VFA mixed standard (Supelco Volatile Free Acid Mix, Cat. #: CRM46975) containing acetate, formate, butyrate, isobutyrate, valerate, isovalerate, propionate, caproate, isocaproate, and heptanoate. Dilutions were done in triplicate to achieve the following concentrations: 0.25, 2, 5, 7.5, and 10 mM. To account for differences in sample water content, all VFA measurements were normalized against the sCOD measured from the filtrate, as previously reported81,144. To measure sCOD, a HACH high-range (20–1500 mg COD/L) COD kit (Cat. #: 2565115) was used144146. 100 μL of fecal or cecal sample filtrate, or 25 μL of serum sample filtrate, was transferred to a HACH tube and adjusted to a final volume of 2 mL with deionized water. Samples were digested on a HACH DRB200 Digital Reactor Block (Cat. #: LTV082.53.44001) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. A HACH DR6000 spectrophotometer (Cat. #: LPV441.99.00012) was used to measure sCOD. Resultant data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test, and graphs were generated with GraphPad Prism 10 software. P-values, n values, and standard errors are indicated in figures and legends. For a detailed protocol, see 10.17504/protocols.io.e6nvw4wo7lmk/v2.

Fecal microbiome analysis with shotgun metagenomics

Fecal pellets for metagenomics were collected fresh from live animals at 18 weeks of age and DNA was isolated from one mouse stool sample pellet using the Qiagen QIAamp PowerFecal Pro kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. Aliquots were shipped to Prebiomics S.r.l. (Trento, Italy) for library preparation and sequencing.

DNA was quantified using the Quant-iT™ 1X dsDNA Assay Kit, BR (Life Technologies) in combination with the Varioskan LUX Microplate Reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Sequencing libraries were prepared with the Illumina DNA Prep (M) Tagmentation (96 Samples, IPB) kit in combination with Illumina DNA/RNA UD Indexes. Amplified libraries were purified using the double-sided bead purification procedure, as described in the Illumina protocol. Then, library concentrations (ng/µL) were quantified and base pair (bp) lengths evaluated using the D5000 ScreenTape Assay in combination with a TapeStation 4150 (Agilent Technologies) to establish library pooling volumes. Pooling was then quantified with the Qubit 1x dsDNA HS kit (Life Technologies) and a Qubit 3.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies). Libraries were sequenced using the Novaseq X Plus platform (Illumina) at an average depth of 15 billion base pairs per sample. For a detailed protocol, see 10.17504/protocols.io.e6nvw15dwlmk/v1.

FASTQ files were uniformly processed using the curatedMetagenomicsNextflow pipeline (https://github.com/seandavi/curatedMetagenomicsNextflow commit 4cde6fb). Mouse genomic reads were removed in the KneadData step using the C57BL mouse reference genome. The core output of the pipeline includes quality control (FastQC and Trimmomatic via KneadData) and MetaPhlAn v4.1.1 (10.1038/s41587-023-01688-w, RRID:SCR_004915)147 and HUMANnN v3.9 (10.7554/eLife.65088, RRID:SCR_014620)148 abundance profiles, which were used for statistical analyses. All analyses were performed in R 4.5.1. System, R, and package versions were reported with sessionInfo() at the end of all analysis scripts (see the “Data availability” section).

Data were downloaded and formatted for analyses using the R package parkinsonsMetagenomicData (https://github.com/ASAP-MAC/parkinsonsMetagenomicData). Samples were analyzed at the species genome bin (SGB) level except for relative abundance stackplots (Supplementary Fig. 5A), which were aggregated at the phylum level to aid legend readability.

The mia package (10.18129/B9.bioc.mia, RRID:SCR_023619) was used to perform alpha and beta diversity analyses. Observed richness and Shannon diversity were calculated with addAlpha. ANOVA was used to test for differences in means between genotype-treatment groups. The Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrix was calculated with addDissimilarity on relative abundance data ranging from 0 to 1. The function addMDS coloring by genotype-treatment was used to plot the first two axes of the principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) on the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrix. To test for genotype–treatment effect on the overall microbiome composition, a permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA)149 followed by a permutational test for group homogeneity (permutest) was used, both implemented in addPERMANOVA. To further test for non-overlap between groups, a pairwise PERMANOVA with pairwiseAdonis was used, a custom function documented at https://github.com/pmartinezarbizu/pairwiseAdonis. False discovery rate (FDR) was calculated for all pairwise tests on beta-diversity (e.g., 3 pairwise tests for 3 groups) using the Benjamini–Hochberg method.

The effect of probiotic treatment on the relative abundance and prevalence of each SGB was determined using MaAsLin3 (https://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/maaslin/, RRID:SCR_023241)150. SGB relative abundances in each sample were scaled from 0 to 1, followed by a log2 transformation. Thy1-ASO-treated mice were compared to Thy1-ASO control mice. False discovery rate across all SGBs was calculated using the Benjamini–Hochberg method as implemented in MaAsLin3.

For mediation analysis, behavior data from only one F. prausnitzii cohort were used to match sequencing data. The first three principal coordinates were used as continuous mediators using the Baron and Kenny approach151, with the mediate function implemented in the “mediation” R package (10.32614/CRAN.package.mediation, RRID:SCR_026984). Confidence intervals were estimated using quasi-Bayesian simulations (n = 1000)152.

Supplementary information

Supplementary_Data. (146.7KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the members of the Mazmanian laboratory for their helpful critiques and review of the manuscript. We thank T. Thron for husbandry and maintenance of the Thy1-ASO “Line 61” mouse line, and L.B. De los Santos, I. Cardenas, and J. Gutierrez for animal care. We are grateful to C. Oikonomou for manuscript editing and submission support, and Y. Garcia-Flores for lab administrative support. We would also like to thank J. Griffiths for help with tissue collections. Flow cytometric analysis was performed at the Caltech Flow Cytometry and Cell Sorting Facility, with support from M. Gregory. Multiplex analysis was done at the Caltech Protein Expression Center, with support from M. Anaya. RNA sequencing was carried out by the UCLA Technology Center for Genomics & Bioinformatics (TCGB). Metagenomics sequencing was made possible by Prebiomics S.r.l. (Trento, Italy), with support from M. Bolzan. Figures 1A, B and 2A were created in BioRender (Moiseyenko, A., 2025, https://BioRender.com/zvkyy6g, RRID: SCR_018361). This research was funded in part by Aligning Science Across Parkinson’s (ASAP-020495 and ASAP-000375) through the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research (MJFF) and the Heritage Medical Research Institute to S.K.M., as well as by the Jacobs Institute for Molecular Engineering for Medicine (Caltech) and Beckman Institute at Caltech to R.F.I. For the purpose of open access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright license to all Author Accepted Manuscripts arising from this submission.

Author contributions

A.M. and S.K.M. designed the studies and wrote the manuscript. A.M. led all investigations and drafted figures. Metagenomic analysis and figure creation were executed by G.A., while data processing was done by K.L., with supervision from N.S. and L.D.W. A.M.S. assisted with flow cytometry experiments, tissue collections, and initial manuscript editing. J.C.B. carried out downstream RNA sequencing analysis and figure creation for this data. B.D. collected volatile fatty acid measurements with assistance from D.D., and supervision from R.K.B. A.D.O. performed statistical analysis for motor and GI function assays. A.V.W. supported the design and quality control of RNA sequencing methodology and raw data processing, with supervision from R.F.I. P.S. assisted with behavior data collection and tissue collections. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data availability

The data, code, protocols, and key lab materials used and generated in this study are listed in the Key Resource Table (Supplementary Table 2, also available at 10.5281/zenodo.17137678) alongside their persistent identifiers. For microbiome analysis data, raw FASTQ files were deposited in the SRA (PRJNA1259538) along with sample metadata, and code to generate data, figures, and statistics is available at 10.5281/zenodo.17128213. For RNA sequencing analysis data, raw FASTQ files were deposited in the SRA (PRJNA1308739) along with sample metadata, and code to generate data, figures, and statistics is available at 10.5281/zenodo.17981510. Raw flow cytometry data were deposited to Zenodo (10.5281/zenodo.16929959) along with sample metadata. All other raw data and analyses, including behavior data analysis, original blot images, multiplex, and VFA data, can be found at 10.5281/zenodo.17137678.

Competing interests

S.K.M. is a founder and board member of Vertero Therapeutics and has equity in Nuanced Health and Seed Health. A.M. and S.K.M. hold a patent (US20240066074A1) on the use of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Prevotella histicola for the treatment of PD and have a pending application (US patent application 63/883,383) for the use of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii as a treatment for PD. The other authors do not have a competing interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Anastasiya Moiseyenko, Email: anamois@caltech.edu.

Sarkis K. Mazmanian, Email: sarkis@caltech.edu

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41531-026-01287-x.

References

  • 1.Tysnes, O.-B. & Storstein, A. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neural Transm. (Vienna)124, 901–905 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Poewe, W. et al. Parkinson disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim.3, 17013 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dorsey, E. R., Sherer, T., Okun, M. S. & Bloem, B. R. The emerging evidence of the Parkinson pandemic. J. Parkinsons Dis.8, S3–S8 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Koga, S., Sekiya, H., Kondru, N., Ross, O. A. & Dickson, D. W. Neuropathology and molecular diagnosis of synucleinopathies. Mol. Neurodegener.16, 83 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hawkes, C. H., Del Tredici, K. & Braak, H. A timeline for Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord.16, 79–84 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pardo-Moreno, T. et al. Current treatments and new, tentative therapies for Parkinson’s disease. Pharmaceutics15, 770 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Parkinson, J. An essay on the shaking palsy. JNP14, 223–236 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Forsyth, C. B. et al. Increased intestinal permeability correlates with sigmoid mucosa alpha-synuclein staining and endotoxin exposure markers in early Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE6, e28032 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yang, D. et al. The role of the gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Front. Neurol.10, 1155 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pellicano, C. et al. Prodromal non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat.3, 145–151 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Galbiati, A., Verga, L., Giora, E., Zucconi, M. & Ferini-Strambi, L. The risk of neurodegeneration in REM sleep behavior disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Sleep. Med. Rev.43, 37–46 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Postuma, R. B. & Berg, D. Advances in markers of prodromal Parkinson disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol.12, 622–634 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dorsey, E. R., De Miranda, B. R., Horsager, J. & Borghammer, P. The body, the brain, the environment, and Parkinson’s disease. J. Parkinsons Dis.14, 363–381 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Berg, D. et al. Prodromal Parkinson disease subtypes - key to understanding heterogeneity. Nat. Rev. Neurol.17, 349–361 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Braak, H., Rüb, U., Gai, W. P. & Del Tredici, K. Idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: possible routes by which vulnerable neuronal types may be subject to neuroinvasion by an unknown pathogen. J. Neural Transm. (Vienna)110, 517–536 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kim, S. et al. Transneuronal propagation of pathologic α-synuclein from the gut to the brain models Parkinson’s disease. Neuron103, 627–641.e7 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Challis, C. et al. Gut-seeded α-synuclein fibrils promote gut dysfunction and brain pathology specifically in aged mice. Nat. Neurosci.23, 327–336 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu, B. et al. Vagotomy and Parkinson disease: a Swedish register-based matched-cohort study. Neurology88, 1996–2002 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Svensson, E. et al. Vagotomy and subsequent risk of Parkinson’s disease. Ann. Neurol.78, 522–529 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sampson, T. The impact of indigenous microbes on Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis.135, 104426 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hill-Burns, E. M. et al. Parkinson’s disease and Parkinson’s disease medications have distinct signatures of the gut microbiome. Mov. Disord.32, 739–749 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Aho, V. T. E. et al. Gut microbiota in Parkinson’s disease: Temporal stability and relations to disease progression. EBioMedicine44, 691–707 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bedarf, J. R. et al. Functional implications of microbial and viral gut metagenome changes in early stage L-DOPA-naïve Parkinson’s disease patients. Genome Med.9, 39–39 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wallen, Z. D. et al. Metagenomics of Parkinson’s disease implicates the gut microbiome in multiple disease mechanisms. Nat. Commun.13, 6958 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Elford, J. D., Becht, N., Garssen, J., Kraneveld, A. D. & Perez-Pardo, P. Buty and the beast: the complex role of butyrate in Parkinson’s disease. Front. Pharm.15, 1388401 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dalile, B., Van Oudenhove, L., Vervliet, B. & Verbeke, K. The role of short-chain fatty acids in microbiota–gut–brain communication. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.16, 461–478 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fernández, J. et al. Colon microbiota fermentation of dietary prebiotics towards short-chain fatty acids and their roles as anti-inflammatory and antitumour agents: a review. J. Funct. Foods25, 511–522 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hamilton, A. M., Krout, I. N., White, A. C. & Sampson, T. R. Microbiome-based therapeutics for Parkinson’s disease. Neurotherapeutics21, e00462 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tan, A. H. et al. Probiotics for Constipation in Parkinson disease: a randomized placebo-controlled study. Neurology96, e772–e782 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ibrahim, A. et al. Multi-strain probiotics (Hexbio) containing MCP BCMC strains improved constipation and gut motility in Parkinson’s disease: a randomised controlled trial. PLoS ONE15, e0244680 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Barichella, M. et al. Probiotics and prebiotic fiber for constipation associated with Parkinson disease: an RCT. Neurology87, 1274–1280 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Keshavarzian, A. et al. Colonic bacterial composition in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord.30, 1351–1360 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Unger, M. M. et al. Short chain fatty acids and gut microbiota differ between patients with Parkinson’s disease and age-matched controls. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord.32, 66–72 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li, W. et al. Structural changes of gut microbiota in Parkinson’s disease and its correlation with clinical features. Sci. China Life Sci.60, 1223–1233 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Petrov, V. A. et al. Analysis of gut microbiota in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med.162, 734–737 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Boktor, J. C. et al. Integrated multi-cohort analysis of the Parkinson’s disease gut metagenome. Mov. Disord.38, 399–409 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sokol, H. et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is an anti-inflammatory commensal bacterium identified by gut microbiota analysis of Crohn disease patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA105, 16731–16736 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Quévrain, E. et al. Identification of an anti-inflammatory protein from Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a commensal bacterium deficient in Crohn’s disease. Gut65, 415–425 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Martín, R., Bermúdez-Humarán, L. G. & Langella, P. Searching for the bacterial effector: the example of the multi-skilled commensal bacterium Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. Front Microbiol9, 346 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhou, L. et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii produces butyrate to maintain Th17/Treg balance and to ameliorate colorectal colitis by inhibiting histone deacetylase 1. Inflamm. Bowel Dis.24, 1926–1940 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Li, H.-X. et al. Inflammatory bowel disease and risk of Parkinson’s disease: evidence from a meta-analysis of 14 studies involving more than 13.4 million individuals. Front. Med. (Lausanne)10, 1137366 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhu, Y. et al. Association between inflammatory bowel diseases and Parkinson’s disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neural Regen. Res.17, 344–353 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chesselet, M.-F. et al. A progressive mouse model of Parkinson’s disease: the Thy1-aSyn (“Line 61”) mice. Neurotherapeutics9, 297–314 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Richter, F., Stanojlovic, M., Käufer, C., Gericke, B. & Feja, M. A mouse model to test novel therapeutics for Parkinson’s disease: an update on the Thy1-aSyn (‘line 61’) mice. Neurotherapeutics20, 97–116 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Anderson, J. P. et al. Phosphorylation of Ser-129 is the dominant pathological modification of alpha-synuclein in familial and sporadic Lewy body disease. J. Biol. Chem.281, 29739–29752 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Geistlinger, L. et al. BugSigDB captures patterns of differential abundance across a broad range of host-associated microbial signatures. Nat. Biotechnol.42, 790–802 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Martín, R. et al. Faecalibacterium: a bacterial genus with promising human health applications. FEMS Microbiol. Rev.47, fuad039 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yang, X., Qian, Y., Xu, S., Song, Y. & Xiao, Q. Longitudinal analysis of fecal microbiome and pathologic processes in a rotenone induced mice model of Parkinson’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci.9, 441 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sampson, T. R. et al. Alpha synuclein overexpression can drive microbiome dysbiosis in mice. Sci. Rep.15, 4014 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Abdel-Haq, R. et al. A prebiotic diet modulates microglial states and motor deficits in α-synuclein overexpressing mice. eLife11, e81453 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Aktas, B. Gut Microbial alteration in MPTP mouse model of Parkinson disease is administration regimen dependent. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol.43, 2815–2829 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yan, Y. et al. Gut microbiota and metabolites of α-synuclein transgenic monkey models with early stage of Parkinson’s disease. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes7, 69 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wrzosek, L. et al. Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii influence the production of mucus glycans and the development of goblet cells in the colonic epithelium of a gnotobiotic model rodent. BMC Biol.11, 61 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Miquel, S. et al. Identification of metabolic signatures linked to anti-inflammatory effects of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. mBio6, e00300-15 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kim, H., Jeong, Y., Kang, S., You, H. J. & Ji, G. E. Co-Culture with Bifidobacterium catenulatum improves the growth, gut colonization, and butyrate production of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii: in vitro and in vivo studies. Microorganisms8, 788 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Moon, J. et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii alleviates inflammatory arthritis and regulates IL-17 production, short chain fatty acids, and the intestinal microbial flora in experimental mouse model for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther.25, 130 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bredon, M. et al. Faecalibaterium prausnitzii strain EXL01 boosts efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Oncoimmunology13, 2374954 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Shi, Z. et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii promotes anti-PD-L1 efficacy in natural killer/T-cell lymphoma by enhancing antitumor immunity. BMC Med.23, 387 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Park, S.-Y. et al. Alpha-synuclein-specific regulatory T cells ameliorate Parkinson’s disease progression in mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci.24, 15237 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Reynolds, A. D., Banerjee, R., Liu, J., Gendelman, H. E. & Mosley, R. L. Neuroprotective activities of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in an animal model of Parkinson’s disease. J. Leukoc. Biol.82, 1083–1094 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Arce-Sillas, A. et al. Increased levels of regulatory T cells and IL-10-producing regulatory B cells are linked to improved clinical outcome in Parkinson’s disease: a 1-year observational study. J. Neural Transm. (Vienna)131, 901–916 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Miquel, S. et al. Ecology and metabolism of the beneficial intestinal commensal bacterium Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. Gut Microbes5, 146–151 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lenoir, M. et al. Butyrate mediates anti-inflammatory effects of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in intestinal epithelial cells through Dact3. Gut Microbes12, 1–16 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mohebali, N. et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Bacteroides faecis and Roseburia intestinalis attenuate clinical symptoms of experimental colitis by regulating Treg/Th17 cell balance and intestinal barrier integrity. Biomed. Pharmacother.167, 115568 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jabara, H. H. et al. A missense mutation in TFRC, encoding transferrin receptor 1, causes combined immunodeficiency. Nat. Genet.48, 74–78 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bolen, M. L. et al. Peripheral blood immune cells from individuals with Parkinson’s disease or inflammatory bowel disease share deficits in iron storage and transport that are modulated by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Neurobiol. Dis.207, 106794 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sabbir, M. G. Loss of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase 2, transferrin, and transferrin receptor proteins in the temporal cortex of Alzheimer’s patients postmortem is associated with abnormal iron homeostasis: implications for patient survival. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.12, 1469751 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ayton, S., Lei, P., Mclean, C., Bush, A. I. & Finkelstein, D. I. Transferrin protects against Parkinsonian neurotoxicity and is deficient in Parkinson’s substantia nigra. Signal Transduct. Target Ther.1, 16015 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Rentzos, M. et al. Circulating interleukin-15 and RANTES chemokine in Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neurol. Scand.116, 374–379 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Tang, P. et al. Correlation between serum RANTES levels and the severity of Parkinson’s disease. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev.2014, 208408 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Galiano-Landeira, J., Torra, A., Vila, M. & Bové, J. CD8 T cell nigral infiltration precedes synucleinopathy in early stages of Parkinson’s disease. Brain143, 3717–3733 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Williams, G. P. et al. CD4 T cells mediate brain inflammation and neurodegeneration in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Brain144, 2047–2059 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Sekijima, Y. Recent progress in the understanding and treatment of transthyretin amyloidosis. J. Clin. Pharm. Ther.39, 225–233 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Maetzler, W. et al. Serum and cerebrospinal fluid levels of transthyretin in Lewy body disorders with and without dementia. PLoS ONE7, e48042 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sárkány, Z. et al. Transthyretin has conformation-selective proteolytic activity against α-synuclein. Preprint at bioRxiv10.1101/2023.08.10.552896 (2023).
  • 76.Cardoso, B. R., Roberts, B. R., Bush, A. I. & Hare, D. J. Selenium, selenoproteins and neurodegenerative diseases. Metallomics7, 1213–1228 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Xu, K. et al. Engineered selenium/human serum albumin nanoparticles for efficient targeted treatment of Parkinson’s disease via oral gavage. ACS Nano17, 19961–19980 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.De Miranda, B. R., Goldman, S. M., Miller, G. W., Greenamyre, J. T. & Dorsey, E. R. Preventing Parkinson’s disease: an environmental agenda. J. Parkinsons Dis.12, 45–68 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Scheperjans, F. et al. Gut microbiota are related to Parkinson’s disease and clinical phenotype. Mov. Disord.30, 350–358 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Tan, A. H. et al. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord.20, 535–540 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Sampson, T. R. et al. Gut microbiota regulate motor deficits and neuroinflammation in a model of Parkinson’s disease. Cell167, 1469–1480.e12 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Choi, J. G. et al. Oral administration of Proteus mirabilis damages dopaminergic neurons and motor functions in mice. Sci. Rep.8, 1275 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Matheoud, D. et al. Intestinal infection triggers Parkinson’s disease-like symptoms in Pink1−/− mice. Nature571, 565–569 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Zhao, Z. et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation protects rotenone-induced Parkinson’s disease mice via suppressing inflammation mediated by the lipopolysaccharide-TLR4 signaling pathway through the microbiota–gut–brain axis. Microbiome9, 226–226 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Sun, M.-F. et al. Neuroprotective effects of fecal microbiota transplantation on MPTP-induced Parkinson’s disease mice: gut microbiota, glial reaction and TLR4/TNF-α signaling pathway. Brain Behav. Immun.70, 48–60 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Zhong, Z. et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation exerts a protective role in MPTP-induced Parkinson’s disease via the TLR4/PI3K/AKT/NF-κB pathway stimulated by α-synuclein. Neurochem. Res.46, 3050–3058 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Xie, Z. et al. Healthy human fecal microbiota transplantation into mice attenuates MPTP-induced neurotoxicity via AMPK/SOD2 pathway. Aging Dis.14, 2193–2214 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Bruggeman, A. et al. Safety and efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation in patients with mild to moderate Parkinson’s disease (GUT-PARFECT): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 2 trial. EClinicalMedicine71, 102563 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Cheng, Y. et al. Efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with Parkinson’s disease: clinical trial results from a randomized, placebo-controlled design. Gut Microbes15, 2284247 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.DuPont, H. L. et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation in Parkinson’s disease—a randomized repeat-dose, placebo-controlled clinical pilot study. Front. Neurol.14, 1104759 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Scheperjans, F. et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation for treatment of Parkinson disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. e242305 (2024) 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.2305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 92.Peter, I. et al. Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy and incidence of Parkinson disease among patients with inflammatory bowel disease. JAMA Neurol.75, 939–946 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Gao, X., Chen, H., Schwarzschild, M. A. & Ascherio, A. Use of ibuprofen and risk of Parkinson disease. Neurology76, 863–869 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Barnum, C. J. et al. Peripheral administration of the selective inhibitor of soluble tumor necrosis factor (TNF) XPro®1595 attenuates nigral cell loss and glial activation in 6-OHDA hemiparkinsonian rats. J. Parkinsons Dis.4, 349–360 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Swiątkiewicz, M., Zaremba, M., Joniec, I., Członkowski, A. & Kurkowska-Jastrzębska, I. Potential neuroprotective effect of ibuprofen, insights from the mice model of Parkinson’s disease. Pharm. Rep.65, 1227–1236 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Zhao, P. et al. Neuroprotective effects of fingolimod in mouse models of Parkinson’s disease. FASEB J.31, 172–179 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Nie, K. et al. Roseburia intestinalis: a beneficial gut organism from the discoveries in genus and species. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.11, 757718 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Zhu, C. et al. Roseburia intestinalis inhibits interleukin‑17 excretion and promotes regulatory T cells differentiation in colitis. Mol. Med. Rep.17, 7567–7574 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Han, H. S. et al. Roseburia intestinalis-derived extracellular vesicles ameliorate colitis by modulating intestinal barrier, microbiome, and inflammatory responses. J. Extracell. Vesicles13, e12487 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Choi, S. I. et al. The protective effect of Roseburia faecis against repeated water avoidance stress-induced irritable bowel syndrome in a Wister rat model. J. Cancer Prev.28, 93–105 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.He, T., Cheng, X. & Xing, C. The gut microbial diversity of colon cancer patients and the clinical significance. Bioengineered12, 7046–7060 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Ai, D. et al. Identifying gut microbiota associated with colorectal cancer using a zero-inflated lognormal model. Front. Microbiol.10, 826 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Chen, W. et al. Enhanced microbiota profiling in patients with quiescent Crohn’s disease through comparison with paired healthy first-degree relatives. Cell Rep. Med.5, 101624 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Liu, D. et al. Anaerostipes hadrus, a butyrate-producing bacterium capable of metabolizing 5-fluorouracil. mSphere9, e0081623 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Ihekweazu, F. D. et al. Bacteroides ovatus ATCC 8483 monotherapy is superior to traditional fecal transplant and multi-strain bacteriotherapy in a murine colitis model. Gut Microbes10, 504–520 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Ihekweazu, F. D. et al. Bacteroides ovatus promotes IL-22 production and reduces trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid-driven colonic inflammation. Am. J. Pathol.191, 704–719 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Hayase, E. et al. Bacteroides ovatus alleviates dysbiotic microbiota-induced graft-versus-host disease. Cell Host Microbe32, 1621–1636.e6 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Liu, N. et al. Eubacterium rectale Improves the efficacy of anti-PD1 immunotherapy in melanoma via l-serine-mediated NK cell activation. Research (Washington, DC)6, 0127 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Lu, H. et al. Butyrate-producing Eubacterium rectale suppresses lymphomagenesis by alleviating the TNF-induced TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB axis. Cell Host Microbe30, 1139–1150.e7 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Marietta, E. V. et al. Suppression of inflammatory arthritis by human gut-derived Prevotella histicola in humanized mice. Arthritis Rheumatol.68, 2878–2888 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Shahi, S. K. et al. Prevotella histicola, a human gut commensal, is as potent as COPAXONE® in an animal model of multiple sclerosis. Front. Immunol.10, 462 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Qiu, X., Zhang, M., Yang, X., Hong, N. & Yu, C. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii upregulates regulatory T cells and anti-inflammatory cytokines in treating TNBS-induced colitis. J. Crohns Colitis7, e558–e568 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Martín, R. et al. The commensal bacterium Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is protective in DNBS-induced chronic moderate and severe colitis models. Inflamm. Bowel Dis.20, 417–430 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Arpaia, N. et al. Metabolites produced by commensal bacteria promote peripheral regulatory T-cell generation. Nature504, 451–455 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Aktas, B., Aslim, B. & Ozdemir, D. A. A neurotherapeutic approach with Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus E9 on gut microbiota and intestinal barrier in MPTP-induced mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Sci. Rep.14, 15460 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Liu, X. et al. Polymannuronic acid prebiotic plus Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG probiotic as a novel synbiotic promoted their separate neuroprotection against Parkinson’s disease. Food Res. Int.155, 111067 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Liao, J.-F. et al. Lactobacillus plantarum PS128 alleviates neurodegenerative progression in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-induced mouse models of Parkinson’s disease. Brain Behav. Immun.90, 26–46 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Lee, Y. Z. et al. Neuroprotective effects of Lactobacillus plantarum PS128 in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease: the role of gut microbiota and microRNAs. Int. J. Mol. Sci.24, 6794 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Qiao, C.-M. et al. Akkermansia muciniphila is beneficial to a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease, via alleviated neuroinflammation and promoted neurogenesis, with involvement of SCFAs. Brain Sci.14, 238 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Lu, C.-S. et al. The add-on effect of Lactobacillus plantarum PS128 in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a pilot study. Front Nutr.8, 650053 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Chu, C. et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the effects of probiotics in Parkinson’s disease. Food Funct.14, 3406–3422 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Cheng, A. G. et al. Design, construction, and in vivo augmentation of a complex gut microbiome. Cell185, 3617–3636.e19 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Han, S. et al. A metabolomics pipeline for the mechanistic interrogation of the gut microbiome. Nature595, 415–420 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Rockenstein, E. et al. Differential neuropathological alterations in transgenic mice expressing α-synuclein from the platelet-derived growth factor and Thy-1 promoters. J. Neurosci. Res.68, 568–578 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Fleming, S. M. et al. Early and progressive sensorimotor anomalies in mice overexpressing wild-type human alpha-synuclein. J. Neurosci.24, 9434–9440 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Zhang, J. et al. Motor impairments, striatal degeneration, and altered dopamine–glutamate interplay in mice lacking PSD-95. J. Neurogenet.28, 98–111 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Lewis, S. J. & Heaton, K. W. Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand. J. Gastroenterol.32, 920–924 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Nagakura, Y., Naitoh, Y., Kamato, T., Yamano, M. & Miyata, K. Compounds possessing 5-HT3 receptor antagonistic activity inhibit intestinal propulsion in mice. Eur. J. Pharm.311, 67–72 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Camilleri, M. & Linden, D. R. Measurement of gastrointestinal and colonic motor functions in humans and animals. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.2, 412–428 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Koslo, R. J., Burks, T. F. & Porreca, F. Centrally administered bombesin affects gastrointestinal transit and colonic bead expulsion through supraspinal mechanisms. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther.238, 62–67 (1986). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B: Stat. Methodol.57, 289–300 (1995).
  • 132.Cliff, N. Dominance statistics: ordinal analyses to answer ordinal questions. Psychol. Bull.114, 494–509 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Efron, B. Better bootstrap confidence intervals. J. Am. Stat. Assoc.82, 171–185 (1987).
  • 134.Cochran, W. G. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics10, 101–129 (1954). [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Higgins, J. P. T. & Thompson, S. G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat. Med.21, 1539–1558 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Lee, B. R. & Kamitani, T. Improved immunodetection of endogenous α-synuclein. PLoS ONE6, e23939 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics29, 15–21 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics30, 923–930 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol.15, 550 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Yu, G., Wang, L.-G., Han, Y. & He, Q.-Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS16, 284–287 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Wickham, H. Data analysis. In ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (ed. Wickham, H.) 189–201 (Springer International Publishing, 2016).
  • 142.Reynolds, M. C. et al. Delineating the drivers and functionality of methanogenic niches within an arid landfill. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.88, e0243821 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Mohana Rangan, S. et al. Decoupling Fe0 application and bioaugmentation in space and time enables microbial reductive dechlorination of trichloroethene to ethene: evidence from soil columns. Environ. Sci. Technol.57, 4167–4179 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Davis, T. L. et al. Chemical oxygen demand can be converted to gross energy for food items using a linear regression model. J. Nutr.151, 445–453 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Dirks, B. et al. Methanogenesis associated with altered microbial production of short-chain fatty acids and human-host metabolizable energy. ISME J.19, wraf103 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Corbin, K. D. et al. Host-diet-gut microbiome interactions influence human energy balance: a randomized clinical trial. Nat. Commun.14, 3161 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Blanco-Míguez, A. et al. Extending and improving metagenomic taxonomic profiling with uncharacterized species using MetaPhlAn 4. Nat. Biotechnol.41, 1633–1644 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Beghini, F. et al. Integrating taxonomic, functional, and strain-level profiling of diverse microbial communities with bioBakery 3. Elife10, e65088 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Anderson, M. J. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). In Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online (eds Balakrishnan, N. et al.) (John Wiley & Sons, 2017).
  • 150.Nickols, W. A. et al. MaAsLin 3: refining and extending generalized multivariable linear models for meta-omic association discovery. Nat. Methods10.1038/s41592-025-02923-9 (2026). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 151.Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.51, 1173–1182 (1986). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.King, G., Tomz, M. & Wittenberg, J. Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation. Am. J. Political Sci.44, 347–361 (2000). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary_Data. (146.7KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The data, code, protocols, and key lab materials used and generated in this study are listed in the Key Resource Table (Supplementary Table 2, also available at 10.5281/zenodo.17137678) alongside their persistent identifiers. For microbiome analysis data, raw FASTQ files were deposited in the SRA (PRJNA1259538) along with sample metadata, and code to generate data, figures, and statistics is available at 10.5281/zenodo.17128213. For RNA sequencing analysis data, raw FASTQ files were deposited in the SRA (PRJNA1308739) along with sample metadata, and code to generate data, figures, and statistics is available at 10.5281/zenodo.17981510. Raw flow cytometry data were deposited to Zenodo (10.5281/zenodo.16929959) along with sample metadata. All other raw data and analyses, including behavior data analysis, original blot images, multiplex, and VFA data, can be found at 10.5281/zenodo.17137678.


Articles from NPJ Parkinson's Disease are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES