Table 2.
Impact of broad private sector engagement on population-weighted median and interquartile range of the spatial accessibility index.
| District, type of service | Public | Public + Private | Change in median | Change in IQR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median (1st, 3rd quartile)A | IQRA | Median (1st, 3rd quartile)A | IQRA | |||
| District A, clinical evaluation | 44 (17, 56) | 39 | 117 (66, 163) | 97 | +166% | +150% |
| District A, sputum test | 44 (17, 56) | 39 | 85 (53, 116) | 63 | +94% | +62% |
| District A, chest radiography | 10 (1, 20) | 19 | 36 (6, 53) | 47 | +260% | +145% |
| District B, clinical evaluation | 59 (52, 69) | 18 | 140 (102, 168) | 66 | +138% | +274% |
| District B, sputum test | 59 (52, 69) | 18 | 106 (89, 128) | 39 | +70% | +121% |
| District B, chest radiography | 24 (3, 40) | 37 | 40 (16, 51) | 35 | +69% | −5% |
IQR = interquartile range.
A
All values of the spatial accessibility index have been multiplied by 106.