Table 3.
Impact of targeted engagement of the subset of private facilities that would achieve the largest decrease in the population-weighted interquartile range of the spatial accessibility index.
| District, type of service | Number of private facilities in subset | Median (1st, 3rd quartile)A | IQRA | Change in median | Change in IQR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| District A, clinical evaluation | 7 | 66 (45, 84) | 39 | +51% | −<1% |
| District A, sputum test | 5 | 61 (36, 75) | 39 | +38% | −<1% |
| District A, chest radiography | 1 | 11 (2, 22) | 19 | +8% | −1% |
| District B, clinical evaluation | No equity-promoting subset | Not applicable | |||
| District B, sputum test | No equity-promoting subset | Not applicable | |||
| District B, chest radiography | 1 | 30 (14, 41) | 27 | +28% | −26% |
IQR = interquartile range.
A
All values of the spatial accessibility index have been multiplied by 106.