Skip to main content
. 2026 Mar 7;26:189. doi: 10.1186/s12880-026-02257-8

Table 3.

Comparison of 3DE LV strain components of HCM subgroups

HCM with Moderate Hypertrophy P values of LVOTO vs. nonobstructive P values of two LVOTO groups
All
(n=216)
Nonobstructive
(n=38)
Provokable LVOTO(n=63) Resting LVOTO(n=115) Provokable LVOTO Resting LVOTO
GLS, -% 14.4(12.0, 16.7) 12.5 (10.0, 13.3) 15.0 (13.0, 17.0) 15.0 (12.0, 17.0) 0.003* 0.002* >0.999
GCS, -% 18.6(16.1, 21.1) 17.0 (14.0, 18.3) 18.0 (15.3, 21.0) 19.0 (17.0, 21.0) 0.023* 0.002* 0.213
GAS, -% 28.8(24.6, 32.3) 25.0 (22.0, 29.0) 29.0 (25.0, 32.8) 30.0 (26.0, 32.0) 0.020* 0.001* >0.999
GRS, % 46.6(37.2, 53.5) 36.5 (32.0, 46.5) 48.0 (38.0, 54.0) 48.0 (40.0, 54.5) 0.012* 0.001* >0.999
Peak twist, ° 12.4(6.6, 17.3) 6.3 (3.1, 10.4) 13.2 (7.05, 17.4) 13.7 (8.4, 19.4) 0.004* <0.001* 0.397
Peak torsion, °/cm 2.5±1.2 1.6 (0.9, 2.2) 2.5 (1.5, 3.1) 2.7 (2.1, 3.6) 0.031* <0.001* 0.092

Footnote: Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range) for continuous variables and number (percentage) for categorical variables. Comparisons among groups were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables, and the chi-square test for categorical variables. *indicates statistic difference is significant (p<0.05). LVOTO: left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, GLS: global longitudinal strain, GCS: global circumferential strain, GAS: global area strain, GRS: global radial strain