Skip to main content
. 2026 Apr 1;25:59. doi: 10.1186/s12938-026-01564-z

Table 2.

Classification performance (fivefold cross-validation) of MLR models using each hemodynamic parameter (ΔHbO, HF, VO2, Tp) at 60 and 100 mmHg. Models were adjusted for age, diabetes duration, hypertension duration, sex, BMI, and smoking status. Values are reported as mean ± SD across folds

Adjusted Parameter Occlusion Pressure (mmHg) CV AUC (mean ± SD) CV Accuracy (mean ± SD) CV Sensitivity (mean ± SD) CV Specificity (mean ± SD) CV Precision (mean ± SD) CV F1-score (mean ± SD)
ΔHbO 60 0.9087 ± 0.0681 0.8170 ± 0.0910 0.8551 ± 0.0837 0.7790 ± 0.1139 0.7980 ± 0.1025 0.8245 ± 0.0867
HF 60 0.9833 ± 0.0089 0.9181 ± 0.0351 0.9319 ± 0.0371 0.9043 ± 0.0364 0.9083 ± 0.0349 0.9199 ± 0.0343
VO2 60 0.8120 ± 0.0918 0.7447 ± 0.1204 0.7623 ± 0.1665 0.7290 ± 0.1030 0.7331 ± 0.1106 0.7446 ± 0.1280
Tp 60 0.6154 ± 0.0867 0.6058 ± 0.0425 0.6148 ± 0.0825 0.5983 ± 0.0610 0.5909 ± 0.0422 0.6007 ± 0.0526
ΔHbO 100 0.8457 ± 0.0729 0.7702 ± 0.0788 0.8225 ± 0.1378 0.7199 ± 0.1866 0.7671 ± 0.1167 0.7799 ± 0.0663
HF 100 0.8926 ± 0.0202 0.8000 ± 0.0389 0.8261 ± 0.0307 0.7739 ± 0.0567 0.7864 ± 0.0459 0.8054 ± 0.0350
VO2 100 0.7413 ± 0.0890 0.6851 ± 0.0696 0.7370 ± 0.1125 0.6355 ± 0.0699 0.6667 ± 0.0548 0.6979 ± 0.0728
Tp 100 0.7138 ± 0.0706 0.6702 ± 0.0524 0.7067 ± 0.0793 0.6381 ± 0.1319 0.6584 ± 0.0759 0.6762 ± 0.0433

CV cross-validation, AUC area under the ROC curve

Sensitivity = recall. Metrics were computed on held-out folds and summarized across 5 folds. Sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score were computed using a fixed probability threshold of 0.50 (p ≥ 0.50 classified as PAD; p ≤ 0.50 classified as non-PAD).