Skip to main content
. 2005 Nov 10;5:118. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-118

Table 2.

Past socio-economic among non-complier and complier subjects, and prevalence of H. pylori infection.

Characteristics Test non-compliers (n = 200) n (%) Test compliers (n = 363) n (%) p1 Prevalence2 n (%) p3
Place of living 0.1 0.2
Urban only 133 (66.5) 217 (60,4) 135 (62.2)
Urban and rural 66 (33.5) 142 (39.6) 96 (67.6)
Mother education 0.6 0.0014
≤ 4 108 (63.9) 203 (65.1) 143 (70.4)
5–7 29 (17.2) 61 (19.6) 38 (62.3)
8–10 13 (7.7) 16 (5.1) 8 (50.0)
≥ 11 19 (11.2) 32 (10.3) 12 (37.5)
Father education (y) 0.2 0.0014
≤ 4 101 (63.9) 181 (50.4) 127 (70.2)
5–7 21 (13.3) 59 (16,4) 39 (66.1)
8–10 12 (7.6) 24 (6.7) 11 (45.8)
≥ 11 24 (15.2) 30 (8.4) 9 (30.0)
N° siblings 0.9 0.0014
0–2 60 (30.2) 113 (31.5) 55 (48.7)
3–4 49 (24.6) 77 (21.4) 54 (70.1)
5–6 35 (17.6) 67 (18.7) 43 (64.2)
≥ 7 55 (27.6) 102 (28.4) 79 (77.5)
Day-care center childhood 0.2 <0.001
Yes 11 (5,5) 11 (3.1) 10 (90.9)
No 188 (94.5) 348 (96.9) 221 (63.5)

1p of difference between test-compliers and test non-compliers according to the independent variables

2 prevalence among test-compliers

3p of the association between the independent variable and the prevalence of H. pylori infection

4test for linear trend