Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1976 Jun;258(1):33–61. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011405

Direct and indirect activation of nerve cells by electrical pulses applied extracellularly.

B Gustafsson, E Jankowska
PMCID: PMC1308958  PMID: 940071

Abstract

1. The mode of activation of nerve cells by extracellular stimuli was investigated while recording from a selected cell with one electrode, and applying current pulses around this cell with another electrode. The analysis was done on motoneurones and on spinal border cells from lower lumbar segments in the cat. 2. Directly evoked action potentials were defined by their appearance in an all-or-none fashion with stable latencies of less than 0-5 ms. The lowest thresholds for their generation were 0-15-0-20 muA in the spinal border cells and 0-35-0-40 muA in the motoneurones. In the main series on motoneurones a correlation has been established between different positions of the extracellular stimulating electrode in relation to the cells and the thresholds for the direct excitation of these cells. The position of the electrode were defined on the basis of an analysis of the IS and SD components of the action potentials recorded extracellularly around the cell when evoked by current pulses applied through the intracellular electrode; both the amplitudes of these IS and SD components and their timing with the IS and SD spikes, which were simultaneously recorded with the intracellular electrode, were then taken into account. The lowest thresholds (less than 2 muA) for the direct activation of cells were found nearest the initial segment of the axon. Their values increased to about 5 mu A at near-soma positions and to greater than 10 muA at near-dendrites positions about 150 mum away. 3. Transsynaptically evoked action potentials which were clearly set up by the preceding e.p.s.p.s appeared with latencies greater than 0-7 ms. When single current pulses were used, the lowest thresholds for transsynaptic spike activation were usually greater than 5-10 muA but they considerably decreased with repetitive stimuli. These thresholds were higher than the thresholds for the direct activation of cells within the region of the initial segment, of the same order of magnitude near the soma, and lower when the stimulating electrode was nearer the dendrites than the soma and generally at all larger distances from the cells. 4. All the observations on direct excitation of cells by extracellular stimuli (generation of the IS spike before the SD spike, lowest thresholds near the region of the initial segment of the axon, similar rates of increase in these thresholds with distance as for fibres) lead to the conclusion that the effects of the extracellular stimuli are exerted primarily via spread of current to the initial segment of the axon and its depolarization. 5. Late extracellular negativities presumably related to dendritic activation were observed in a few cells. These negativities were synchronous with late components of the intracellulary recorded action potentials.

Full text

PDF
33

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abzug C., Maeda M., Peterson B. W., Wilson V. J. Cervical branching of lumbar vestibulospinal axons. J Physiol. 1974 Dec;243(2):499–522. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akaike T., Fanardjian V. V., Ito M., Kumada M., Nakajima H. Electrophysiological analysis of the vestibulospinal reflex pathway of rabbit. I. Classification of tract cells. Exp Brain Res. 1973 Jul 30;17(5):477–496. doi: 10.1007/BF00234863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baldissera F., Lundberg A., Udo M. Stimulation of pre- and postsynaptic elements in the red nucleus. Exp Brain Res. 1972;15(2):151–167. doi: 10.1007/BF00235579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burke R., Lundberg A., Weight F. Spinal border cell origin of the ventral spinocerebellar tract. Exp Brain Res. 1971;12(3):283–294. doi: 10.1007/BF00237921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FATT P. Electric potentials occurring around a neurone during its antidromic activation. J Neurophysiol. 1957 Jan;20(1):27–60. doi: 10.1152/jn.1957.20.1.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. FURSHPAN E. J., FURUKAWA T. Intracellular and extracellular responses of the several regions of the Mauthner cell of the goldfish. J Neurophysiol. 1962 Nov;25:732–771. doi: 10.1152/jn.1962.25.6.732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jankowska E., Padel Y., Tanaka R. Projections of pyramidal tract cells to alpha-motoneurones innervating hind-limb muscles in the monkey. J Physiol. 1975 Aug;249(3):637–667. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jankowska E., Padel Y., Tanaka R. The mode of activation of pyramidal tract cells by intracortical stimuli. J Physiol. 1975 Aug;249(3):617–636. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jankowska E., Roberts W. J. An electrophysiological demonstration of the axonal projections of single spinal interneurones in the cat. J Physiol. 1972 May;222(3):597–622. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jankowska E., Roberts W. J. Synaptic actions of single interneurones mediating reciprocal Ia inhibition of motoneurones. J Physiol. 1972 May;222(3):623–642. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jankowska E., Smith D. O. Antidromic activation of Renshaw cells and their axonal projections. Acta Physiol Scand. 1973 Jun;88(2):198–214. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1973.tb05447.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. KATZ B., MILEDI R. PROPAGATION OF ELECTRIC ACTIVITY IN MOTOR NERVE TERMINALS. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1965 Feb 16;161:453–482. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1965.0015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. NELSON P. G., FRANK K. EXTRACELLULAR POTENTIAL FIELDS OF SINGLE SPINAL MOTONEURONS. J Neurophysiol. 1964 Sep;27:913–927. doi: 10.1152/jn.1964.27.5.913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. NELSON P. G., FRANK K. ORTHODROMICALLY PRODUCED CHANGES IN MOTONEURONAL EXTRACELLULAR FIELDS. J Neurophysiol. 1964 Sep;27:928–941. doi: 10.1152/jn.1964.27.5.928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nelson P. G., Burke R. E. Delayed depolarization in cat spinal motoneurons. Exp Neurol. 1967 Jan;17(1):16–26. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(67)90118-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Roberts W. J., Smith D. O. Analysis of threshold currents during microstimulation of fibres in the spinal cord. Acta Physiol Scand. 1973 Nov;89(3):384–394. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1973.tb05533.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stoney S. D., Jr, Thompson W. D., Asanuma H. Excitation of pyramidal tract cells by intracortical microstimulation: effective extent of stimulating current. J Neurophysiol. 1968 Sep;31(5):659–669. doi: 10.1152/jn.1968.31.5.659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. TERZUOLO C. A., ARAKI T. An analysis of intra- versus extracellular potential changes associated with activity of single spinal motoneurons. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1961 Sep 6;94:547–558. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1961.tb35558.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES