Skip to main content
. 2026 Mar 14;143(9-10):4691–4711. doi: 10.1007/s00170-026-17695-5

Table 2.

Field-assisted processing comparison

Dimensions LAM UVAM MAM IIAM
Core mechanism Local heating produces softening or phase change High-frequency micro vibration creates intermittent contact and the material softening effect Using magnetic fields to regulate dislocation motion within the material Implanting ions form an defect layer that weakens bonds in a shallow surface region
Cutting force Large reduction Moderate reduction Reduction depending on the carrier material Small reduction
Material removal rate Enables increased depth of cut and feed rate Enables steady removal but typically slower than LAM Slight improvement Slightly increase the depth of cut
Surface roughness Significant improvement Significant improvement Significant improvement Significant improvement
Subsurface damage Significant reduction of brittle cracking Micro-cracks, spalling, and pitting Moderate reduction Deep cracks and excessive amorphization
Cost Medium Medium Medium High
Typical side effects HAZ, oxidation, and recast Fixture fatigue and secondary ploughing Field nonuniformity Residual stress and foreign species