Table 2.
Field-assisted processing comparison
| Dimensions | LAM | UVAM | MAM | IIAM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core mechanism | Local heating produces softening or phase change | High-frequency micro vibration creates intermittent contact and the material softening effect | Using magnetic fields to regulate dislocation motion within the material | Implanting ions form an defect layer that weakens bonds in a shallow surface region |
| Cutting force | Large reduction | Moderate reduction | Reduction depending on the carrier material | Small reduction |
| Material removal rate | Enables increased depth of cut and feed rate | Enables steady removal but typically slower than LAM | Slight improvement | Slightly increase the depth of cut |
| Surface roughness | Significant improvement | Significant improvement | Significant improvement | Significant improvement |
| Subsurface damage | Significant reduction of brittle cracking | Micro-cracks, spalling, and pitting | Moderate reduction | Deep cracks and excessive amorphization |
| Cost | Medium | Medium | Medium | High |
| Typical side effects | HAZ, oxidation, and recast | Fixture fatigue and secondary ploughing | Field nonuniformity | Residual stress and foreign species |