Skip to main content
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2026 Apr 7;17:1725249. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2026.1725249

Interaction with CYP20–3 limits OPDA flux into jasmonate biosynthesis in wounded leaves of arabidopsis grown at eCO2

Amelia Redl 1,, Jennifer Gabriel 2,3,, Nicole M van Dam 2,3,4,, Jacqueline C Bede 1,*,
PMCID: PMC13096701  PMID: 42023003

Abstract

Upon recognition of a stress, such as wounding, a rapid increase in jasmonates leads to plant resistance against necrotrophic pathogens and chewing insect herbivores. This jasmonate burst is weaker in Arabidopsis thaliana plants grown under future predicted carbon dioxide levels (eCO2) compared to todays’ levels. Even though foliar levels of jasmonoyl-isoleucine are lower in wounded arabidopsis at eCO2, levels of their precursor, 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid (OPDA), are not affected by atmospheric CO2 levels. We focused on the role of the OPDA-binding protein CYP20-3 in regulating jasmonate levels in wounded rosettes of arabidopsis grown at eCO2. By comparing phytohormone and transcriptomic responses of wounded wildtype plants and cyp20–3 grown under different CO2 conditions, our results suggest that under eCO2, CYP20–3 binds to OPDA to limit flux into jasmonate biosynthesis. As well, the CYP20-3-OPDA-SAT1-OASTL-B complex activates cysteine production which can lead to glutathione biosynthesis to buffer changes in the cellular redox state, dampening wound-associated oxidative stress that leads to jasmonate biosynthesis.

Keywords: 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid, CYP20-3, elevated carbon dioxide, jasmonate, salicylic acid, wound stress

Introduction

Atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations are predicted to double, reaching 800–1000 ppm, by 2100, compared to 425 ppm in August 2025 (Lee et al., 2021; https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/mlo.html). Even though elevated CO2 (eCO2) levels are predicted to increase photosynthetic efficiency in C3 plants (Nowak et al., 2004; Leakey et al., 2009), research suggests that C3 plants may become more susceptible to necrotrophic pathogens and chewing insect herbivores at eCO2 (Bazinet et al., 2022; Bede and Blande, 2025). Levels of jasmonates, such as jasmonic acid (JA) and jasmonoyl-isoleucine (JA-Ile), critical phytohormones in plant resistance against these pathogens and pests (Koo and Howe, 2009; Li et al., 2022), are lower in wounded Arabidopsis thaliana plants grown at eCO2 (Martinez Henao et al., 2020). However, the mechanism underlying this attenuation is poorly understood.

Wounding, such as that caused by insect chewing herbivory, or recognition of necrotrophic pathogens, triggers jasmonate biosynthesis that leads to induced plant resistance (Wasternack and Hause, 2013; Li et al., 2022). From chloroplast-derived galactolipids, α-linolenic acid leads to the biosynthesis of 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid (OPDA) through the action of a 13S-lipoxygenase, allene oxide synthase and allene oxide cyclase. OPDA is transported to the peroxisome where it is converted to JA, through β-oxidation and reduction reactions. JA is exported to the cytosol and conjugated to isoleucine to produce jasmonoyl-isoleucine (JA-Ile) which enters the nucleus and binds to the Skp1/Cullin/F-box (SCF)COI1 ubiquitin ligase complex and jasmonate-Zim domain (JAZ) proteins (Chini et al., 2009). The bridging of the ubiquitin ligase and JAZ proteins leads to their degradation through the 26S-proteasome and releases MYC2, 4 or 6 transcription factors from repression leading to JA-Ile-responsive gene expression (Wasternack and Strnad, 2018). This results in the expression of many plant resistance-related genes, many of which encode enzymes required for the biosynthesis of specialized metabolites involved in plant defense as well as those involved in jasmonate biosynthesis (Jung et al., 2007). However, it should be noted that in addition to its role as a precursor to JA-Ile, OPDA is also biologically active and regulates the expression of defense genes distinct from those induced by JA-Ile (Taki et al., 2005). However, recent evidence has shown that while treatment with exogenous OPDA activates JA-Ile-independent gene expression, endogenous OPDA produced after wounding functions primarily as a jasmonate precursor rather than as an independent signal (Mekkaoui et al., 2025).

There is growing evidence that jasmonate biosynthesis may be affected by atmospheric CO2 levels (Bazinet et al., 2022 and references therein). Of particular note, though lower JA and/or JA-Ile levels are often observed in C3 plants grown at eCO2, little effect is seen on the levels of their biosynthetic precursor OPDA. This implies that a CO2-mediated block may occur between OPDA and JA biosynthesis.

OPDA is also involved in regulating redox signaling through its interaction with Cyclophilin 20-3 (CYP20-3), an OPDA-binding protein (Park et al., 2013). This enzyme has two catalytic activities (Cheong et al., 2017); it can act as a peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase (PPIase) involved in remodeling protein structures or as a reductase that transfers electrons from one protein to another through its sequential reduction and oxidation. When OPDA is present and binds to CYP20-3, it forms a complex with serine acetyltransferase 1 (SAT1) and O-acetylserine (thiol) lyase B (OASTL-B) (Cheong et al., 2017; Liu and Park, 2021). Electron transfer to SAT1 stimulates sulfur assimilation leading to cysteine and methionine biosynthesis. Cysteine and methionine can be further metabolized into compounds involved in redox homeostasis or plant defense, such as glutathione or glucosinolates in arabidopsis (Takahashi, 2011). Thus, CYP20–3 is involved in controlling the balance between redox detoxification for carbohydrate biosynthesis and stress responses (Cheong et al., 2017).

CYP20–3 is constitutively present in chloroplast stroma and can be reduced by thioredoxins carrying electrons from the photosynthetic electron transport chain (pETC) (Dominguez-Solis et al., 2008; Cheong et al., 2017). Increasing atmospheric eCO2 level are predicted to influence electron flux through the pETC which may result in changes in electron flow to CYP20–3 and, thus, its interaction with OPDA and glutathione metabolism.

The Foyer-Halliwell-Asada (FHA) cycle is a series of connected redox steps that reduce the reactive oxygen species hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to water using glutathione (Foyer and Noctor, 2011). Wounding plant leaves leads to rapid increases in reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as H2O2, at the wound site and systemically (Prasad et al., 2020; Fichman and Mittler, 2021). This increase in the oxidative state of the cell is both buffered and translated into downstream signaling through the FHA cycle, which links changes in redox metabolites to activation of phytohormone biosynthesis and plant resistance (Foyer and Noctor, 2013). Total and the oxidized-to-reduced ratios of metabolites in this pathway, particularly ascorbate and glutathione, reflect the cellular redox balance and, thus, are important signals of cellular stress levels. In particular, changes in these metabolites can activate salicylic acid (SA) or jasmonate pathways (Cheng et al., 2015; Han et al., 2013a, Han et al., 2013b); however, the subtleties distinguishing activation of one phytohormone pathway versus the other are not yet well understood (Noctor et al., 2024).

In arabidopsis, foliar levels of total glutathione and reduced NADPH were higher in plants grown at eCO2, which translated into higher SA levels (Mhamdi and Noctor, 2016). In contrast, in wounded arabidopis leaves, lower JA levels were seen in plants grown at eCO2 that likely reflected differences in NADP, reduced ascorbate (AsA) and total ascorbate (Asc) levels seen between plants grown in aCO2 or eCO2 environments (Martinez Henao et al., 2020). Thus, phytohormone levels of C3 plants are impacted by eCO2, however, the underlying mechanism is not well understood.

In general, both the SA-signaling pathway, leading to plant resistance against biotrophs, and the jasmonate-signaling pathway, leading to plant resistance against necrotrophic pathogens and chewing insect herbivores, may be affected by increasing atmospheric CO2 levels (Yang et al., 2015; Mhamdi and Noctor, 2016; Martinez Henao et al., 2020; Bazinet et al., 2022; Hou and Tsuda, 2022). In wounded arabidopsis grown at eCO2, jasmonate levels are attenuated but levels of the biosynthetic precursor OPDA are unchanged (Martinez Henao et al., 2020). In mechanically damaged leaves of arabidopsis grown at eCO2, the increased flux through the pETC may lead to higher reduction of CYP20-3, increasing its binding to wound-associated increases in OPDA and limiting OPDA flux into JA-Ile biosynthesis and, possibly, increasing glutathione biosynthesis. In this study, we investigate the role of CYP20–3 in regulating jasmonate biosynthesis in arabidopsis grown at eCO2 by comparing the wound responses in wildtype (WT) and cyp20–3 knockout plants.

Methods and materials

Arabidopsis lines

Arabidopsis thaliana WT (Col-0) and cyp20-3 (SALK_001615C) seeds were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Research Center. The zygosity of the T-DNA inserts in the cyp20–3 SALK line were confirmed to be homozygous by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using gene-specific primers and a left border primer complementary to the T-DNA insert (Supplementary Table 1). The absence of CYP20–3 gene expression and protein in the SALK line was verified by RNA-Seq and Western blot using an anti-CYP20–3 antibody (PhytoAB) (Supplementary Figure 1).

Plant maintenance

Seeds were surface-sterilized by washing in 3% NaOCl for one min, 70% EtOH for one min and three rinses with sterile distilled water. Seeds were stratified in the dark for 3 days at 4 °C then sown in damp potting mix (Fafard Agro Mix G6) in individual pots (square (6.7 cm x 6.7 cm x 8.9 cm)) for the wounding time course experiments. Pots were placed in growth chambers (Conviron GEN 1000) with light and temperature settings programmed to simulate conditions in late May and early June in Montreal: 15 h light (175 μmol m-2 s-1) at 22 °C, light and temperature ramping over 3 h, 4 h dark at 18 °C, light and temperature ramping over 2 h. CO2 levels were maintained at 450 ± 20 ppm (ambient, aCO2) or 900 ± 50 ppm (elevated, eCO2) since the RCP8.5 model predicts that tropospheric CO2 levels will reach this level by 2100 (Lee et al., 2021). Pots were bottom-watered up to 3 times/week with dilute nitrogen: phosphorous: potassium fertilizer (3.4:3.4:3.4). When plants were at growth stage 3.9 (Boyes et al., 2001), they were used in wounding experiments.

Arabidopsis wounding time-course experiment

Since CO2 levels affect plant developmental timing (Ward and Kelly, 2004), experiments were staggered by up to 3 days to ensure that plants were used at the same growth stage (stage 3.9 (Boyes et al., 2001)). Before the wounding time course, a plexiglass panel (61 cm (w) x 106 cm (h)) was placed snugly in the middle of the chamber between the wounded and unwounded plants to minimize volatile signaling between these treatments. Even though the plexiglass minimized the potential of volatile signaling, eCO2 levels in the chamber were not affected.

At the start of the growth cabinet ramping from light-to-dark, half of the plants were wounded. In each wounded plant, approximately 20% of the 7 largest leaves from each plant was wounded with a hole punch taking care not to damage the midvein (Supplementary Table 4). At specific time points after wounding, wounded and unwounded plants were harvested, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at -80°C. For phytohormone analysis, rosettes were collected at 15 min, 30 min, 90 min and 5 hr after wounding. Rosettes for redox metabolite analysis were collected at 90 min after wounding. For gene expression analyses, 3 mid-sized leaves were harvested ensuring that these leaves had been damaged for the wounded plant samples. For qRT-PCR, these leaves were collected 15 min, 30 min, 90 min and 5 hr after wounding. For RNA-Seq, leaves were only collected at the 90 min timepoint. In addition, unwounded plants were harvested at time 0. The time course was temporally repeated 5 times with 1 biological replicate taken for the different analyses each time. Thus, the final replicates are n = 4 for phytohormones, n = 3 for redox metabolites, n = 4 for RNA-Seq and n = 5 for qRT-PCR.

In addition, wounded and unwounded rosettes were harvested to quantify plant biomass (n ≥ 9). The percentage dry weight removed by wounding was calculated as the difference between the average biomass of unwounded and wounded rosettes divided by the average biomass of unwounded samples.

Phytohormones

Phytohormone quantification was conducted based on the protocol by Machado et al. (2013). Rosettes were lyophilized and finely ground. Approximately 20 mg plant sample were extracted in HPLC-grade methanol:water (70:30) containing deuterated phytohormone standards (40 ng/mL; D6-ABA, D6-JA, D6-JA-Ile D6-SA, D5-IAA). Following homogenization (Retsch MM 400, 10 min vibration at 30 hertz), samples were centrifuged to remove debris (20 min x 18,994 g, 20 °C). The supernatant was transferred to a new tube and evaporated to dryness in a speed vaccum (Labconco) at room temperature. Pellets were resuspended in HPLC-grade methanol:water (70:30) using an ultrasonic bath. Samples were recentrifuged (5 min x 18,994 g, room temperature) and the supernatant transferred to a fresh tube.

Phytohormone analysis was performed by ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography (UPLC, Waters Acquity) coupled to a mass spectrometer (Bruker Elite EvoQ triple-quadrupole). Compounds were separated by reverse phase chromatography on a Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 x 50 mm, 1.8 μm, Agilent). The mobile phase was held stationary for the first 30 sec at 5% acetonitrile (ACN) in water containing 0.1% formic acid. Over the next 10 sec, this was increased to 50% ACN, 0.1% formic acid and then to 100% ACN, 0.1% formic acid over the next 90 sec. After holding at 100% ACN, 0.1% formic acid for one minute, the mobile phase returned to initial conditions over 1 min. The flow rate was 400 µL/min and the column temperature was 42 °C.

Separated compounds were nebulized by electrospray ionization in the negative ion mode. The capillary voltage was set to 4500 eV. Cone, probe and nebulizer gases were set to 35 arbitrary units (a.u.)/350 °C, 60 a.u./475 °C, and 60 a.u., respectively. MS Data Review software (Bruker MS Workstation, vers. 8.2) was used for data processing. Phytohormones were identified based on the retention times and m/z transitions monitored (Supplementary Table 2). Phytohormone concentrations were calculated from the peak area of the phytohormone of interest relative to its deuterated standard divided by the dry weight of the extracted leaf material.

Redox metabolites

Since JA-Ile levels were lower in wounded WT plants grown at eCO2 compared to aCO2 at 90 minutes after damage, this timepoint was selected for the analyses of redox metabolites. Oxidized and reduced forms of glutathione and ascorbate were measured using an enzymatic cycling method (Noctor and Mhamdi, 2022). Frozen rosette tissue was ground to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle. Finely-ground tissue (100–150 mg) was extracted in 0.2 M HCl. After centrifugation (10 min x 10,000 g, 4 °C) and transfer of the supernatant to a new tube. Phosphate buffer (final concentration 33 mM, pH 5.6) was added and the pH adjusted to pH 5 by careful stepwise addition of 0.2 M NaOH to generate the neutralized extracts. For the measurement of reduced ascorbate (AsA), neutralized plant extract (40 μL) was added to wells containing phosphate buffer (final concentration 0.1 M, pH 5.6) and the absorbance at 265 nm measured. Ascorbate oxidase (0.2 U) was added followed by shaking (8 min) and measurement again at A265. The change in absorbance was used to calculate the concentration of reduced ascorbate (AsA) based on the molar extinction coefficient of 14 mM-1cm-1. Total ascorbate was measured by pre-treating aliquots of neutralized plant extract in the phosphate buffer (final concentration 0.112 M, pH 5.6) with dithiothreitol (final concentration 1 mM) for 30 min at room temperature followed by spectrophotometric measurement at A265. Oxidized ascorbate (DHA) was determined by subtracting AsA from total ascorbate.

For the measurement of total glutathione, neutralized plant extract (10 µL) was added to wells containing a reaction mixture which had a final concentration after the addition of sample of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) with 5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM NADPH and 0.6 mM 5,5 dithiobis 2-nitro-benzoic acid. Glutathione reductase (0.2 units) was added to initiate the reaction. The increase in absorbance at 412 nm was monitored for 5 min at 20 s intervals. The slope of the linear part of the curve (A412 vs time) was used to calculate glutathione concentration from a standard curve of glutathione (0 to 0.4 nmol, 5 concentrations). For the measurement of oxidized glutathione (GSSG), aliquots of neutralized extracts as well as GSSG standards (0 to 160 pmoles, 5 concentrations) were incubated with 2-vinylpyridine for 30 min to precipitate reduced glutathione (GSH). Following centrifugation twice (10,000 x g, 15 min, room temperature) with the sample transferred to a new tube between centrifugation steps, GSSG levels were measured spectrophotometrically as outlined above. The amount of GSH was calculated as total glutathione minus (2 x GSSG).

Transcriptomics

RNA extraction

Arabidopsis rosettes were finely ground in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality (absorbance ratios A260/A280 and A260/A230) and concentration of the RNA extracts was determined by NanoDrop spectrophotometry. In addition, the RNA quality was assessed after separation on a 1% agarose gel containing 1% bleach including SYBR Safe DNA Gel Stain (Invitrogen) to enable visualization with a Gel Doc imaging system (Bio-Rad) (Aranda et al., 2012).

RNA-Sequencing and analysis

Total RNA (100 ng/µL) was brought to Genome Québec for polyA-enriched library preparation and 100 base paired-end RNA-sequencing by NovaSeq PE100bp (Illumina). After removal of adapter sequences, Fastp was used to remove low quality bases at the ends of the raw reads and reads shorter than 25 bases (Chen et al., 2018). The quality of the raw reads was evaluated using FastQC (Andrews et al., 2010). The processed reads were mapped to the A. thaliana reference genome (assembly 10.1 downloaded from NCBI) using STAR (Dobin et al., 2013). The aligned reads, in Binary Alignment/Map (BAM) files, were input into featureCounts to quantify the strand-specific read counts per gene (Liao et al., 2013). The raw read data (FASTQ) has been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (Bioproject ID #PRJNA1332053).

The resulting gene counts were uploaded to ExpressAnalyst Pro for normalization by Log2 counts per million transformation and DESeq2 conducted to determine differentially expressed genes (Liu et al., 2023; Love et al., 2014). The criteria to determine wound-induced differentially expressed genes in WT plants grown at aCO2 or wound- or SA-responsive genes differentially expressed in WT or cyp20–3 plants grown at aCO2 was a Log2 fold-change (Log2FC) of ≥ 2 (induced) or ≤ -2 (repressed) and an adjusted p value of ≤ 0.05. Once WT wound-induced genes in plants grown at aCO2 were identified, differences between WT or cyp genotypes grown at aCO2 or eCO2 was determined by DESeq2 with a p ≤ 0.05.

Data were visualized using MetaboAnalyst or ExpressAnalyst platforms (Liu et al., 2023; Pang et al., 2024). KEGG terms were identified using https://www.genome.jp/kegg/. Gene ontology (GO) terms were identified by GO Enrichment Analysis (Ashburner et al., 2000; Thomas et al., 2022; Gene Ontology Consortium, 2026).

Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction

Gradient PCR was used to optimize the annealing temperature of gene-specific primers, identified from the literature or designed with primerBLAST (Supplementary Table 1). The amplification efficiency for each primer pair was determined by qRT-PCR (Mx3000) by performing standard curves with 8 x 10-fold dilutions of the PCR amplicon as the template (0.05 fg to 0.5 ng) using the following thermocycling program: 95 °C for 1 minute; 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 seconds, annealing temperature for 30 seconds, 72 °C for 10 seconds, measurement of fluorescence at the end of each cycle; melt from 60 °C to 95 °C. Annealing temperatures and primer concentrations were adjusted to ensure 90-110% amplification efficiencies (Taylor et al., 2019). Amplicons were cloned into pUCm-T vectors (BioBasic) and sent to Genome Québec for Sanger sequencing to confirm the target sequences.

From plant total RNA extracted as described above, RNA (1 µg) was treated with DNase and reverse transcribed to cDNA using a Quantitect reverse transcription kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR with primers spanning an intronic region of IRX12/AtLMCO4 was used to confirm the absence of genomic DNA in the cDNA (Weech et al., 2008).

qRT-PCR reactions were conducted in white 96-well qPCR plates. Each well contained 1 x Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs), gene-specific forward and reverse primers (200–350 nM), 5 ng of cDNA, and nuclease-free water to a final volume of 10 µL. Each sample was spotted in triplicate. Non-template controls (NTCs) and inter-run calibrators (IRCs) consisting of pooled cDNA were included on each plate. Inter-run calibration was performed using the MxPro software to adjust the amplification thresholds so that the quantification cycle (Cq) values are the same for all IRC reactions for each gene.

Amplification was performed using the following conditions: 95 °C for 1 minute; 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 seconds, annealing temperature for 30 seconds, 72 °C for 10 seconds, measurement of fluorescence at the end of each cycle; melt from 60 °C to 95 °C. Two technical plate replicates were performed.

The initial template concentration (R0) for each gene was calculated as R0 = 1/(1+E)Cq, where E is the amplification efficiency for the gene-specific primer pair and Cq is the quantification cycle (Zhao and Fernald, 2005). Relative gene expression levels were normalized to the geometric mean of 3 reference genes (AtCBP20, AtACT2 and AtTIP41) (Vandesompele et al., 2002). The stable expression of these reference genes was verified using geNorm in the web-based tool RefFinder and gene stability value were below 0.5 (Xie et al., 2023).

Statistics

Except for the RNA-Seq data, in general, outliers were detected using the maximal normed residual test (Grubb’s test) and excluded from analysis (Stefansky, 1971). Data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS (vers. 29, IBM) followed by Tukey honest significant difference (HSD) post-hoc test. If a significant interaction effect was observed, the results were further teased apart by a 2- or 1-factor ANOVA.

To determine if genotype or CO2 affected plant biomass, rosette dry weight was analyzed by 2-factor analysis-of-variance (ANOVA) (Factors: genotype, CO2). To determine the amount of biomass removed by wounding, the dry weight of wounded rosettes was subtracted from dry weights of whole rosettes and % removed compared by 2-factor ANOVA (Factors: genotype, CO2).

Phytohormone levels in undamaged and damaged plants were compared by 2-factor ANOVA (Factors: wounding, time) to determine if there are changes in response to wounding. Plants were then separated into unwounded or wounded and separately analyzed by 3-factor ANOVA (Factors: genotype, CO2, time). Data that violated Levene’s test of homogeneity were normalized by log10 transformation.

Redox metabolites were analyzed by 3-way ANOVA (Factors: CO2, genotype, wounding). Data that violated Levene’s test of homogeneity were normalized by log10 transformation.

Statistical analyses and visualization for RNA-Seq data is explained in the RNA-Seq section above. Gene expression measured by qRT-PCR was analyzed separated in unwounded and wounded plants by 3-factor analysis-of-variance (Factors: CO2 level, genotype, time). Data that violated Levene’s test of homogeneity were normalized by log2 transformation.

Results

Plant biomass

The cyp20–3 arabidopsis plants were smaller (38%) than WT plants (Supplementary Figure 2; Supplementary Table 3) (F(1,68) = 45.03, p < 0.001). Because of the known effect of CO2 on plant development (Ward and Kelly, 2004), the wounding experiment on plants grown at aCO2 or eCO2 was staggered, up to 3 days, to ensure they were at the same growth stage. When plants were at the 3.9 growth stage (Boyes et al., 2001), approximately 20% of rosette biomass was removed by mechanical wounding and this was consistent between temporal replicates (Supplementary Figure 2; Supplementary Table 4). The percent tissue removed by wounding was the same for both WT and mutant plants at both CO2 levels (Supplementary Table 4).

Phytohormones

In undamaged arabidopsis rosette leaves, jasmonate levels were basal (Figure 1; Supplementary Table 5). Of interest, OPDA, the precursor to JA and JA-Ile, was higher in WT plants than cyp20-3, while JA was higher in the cyp20–3 mutant (Figures 1A, B). JA and JA-Ile levels in undamaged plants were minimally higher in plants grown at eCO2 compared to aCO2 (Figures 1B, C).

Figure 1.

Six line graphs compare concentrations of 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid, jasmonic acid, and jasmonoyl-isoleucine in undamaged and wounded plants over 300 minutes. Treatments include wild-type and cyp20-3 genotypes under ambient and elevated CO2. Error bars indicate variation, and labeled statistical differences appear in wounded plant graphs.

CO2 and genotype affect jasmonate levels in Arabidopsis thaliana rosettes. Wildtype (WT) and cyp20–3 plants were grown at ambient CO2 (aCO2, 450 ppm) or elevated CO2 (eCO2, 900 ppm). Rosettes were either left undamaged or wounded when plants reached growth stage 3.9 (Boyes et al., 2001). Jasmonates were measured by ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Jasmonate levels in undamaged or damaged plants were analyzed by 3-factor analysis-of-variance (ANOVA) (Factors: CO2, genotype, time) followed by Tukey HSD post-hoc test to identify significant differences (Supplementary Table 5). Undamaged plants (A) 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid levels are higher in WT plants, (B) jasmonic acid (JA) levels are higher in cyp20–3 plants and in plants grown at eCO2, and (C) jasmonoyl-isoleucine (JA-Ile) levels are higher at eCO2. Wounded plants (D) OPDA levels are higher in WT plants, (E) JA levels are higher in the cyp20–3 mutant grown at eCO2, and (F) JA-Ile levels are lower at eCO2. Temporal changes in JA and JA-Ile levels after wounding are denoted by alphabetical letters. Data points represent the mean ± standard error.

Rosette OPDA levels did not change in response to wounding and remained higher in WT plants compared to the cyp20–3 mutant (Supplementary Table 5) (Figure 1D). In contrast, JA and JA-Ile levels increased rapidly, over 50 times levels in undamaged plants, in the first 15 min after wounding (Figures 1E, F). JA levels were higher in the cyp20–3 mutant grown at eCO2 than in the other plants (WT-aCO2, WT-eCO2 or cyp20-3-aCO2). In contrast, JA-Ile levels were higher in plants grown at aCO2 compared to those at eCO2, which is particularly evident in WT plants 90 min after wounding.

To assess the potential role of phytohormone crosstalk in modulating jasmonate signaling, levels of SA and ABA were measured (Figure 2; Supplementary Figure 3). In both undamaged and damaged plants, SA levels were on average 1.4 x higher in plants grown at eCO2 compared to aCO2 (Supplementary Table 5). SA levels were also twice as high in the cyp20–3 mutant compared to WT plants and this was reflected in the expression of the SA-responsive gene AtPR1 (At2g14610). In undamaged rosettes, ABA levels were lowest in WT grown at eCO2 compared to the other plants (WT-aCO2, cyp20-3-aCO2 or cyp20-3-eCO2)(Supplementary Table 5). In wounded plants, ABA levels rose slightly at 90 min and were higher in cyp20–3 mutant compared to WT plants.

Figure 2.

Four line graphs compare salicylic acid levels and AtPR1 gene expression in wild type and cyp20-3 mutant Arabidopsis under ambient and elevated CO2, with and without wounding, over time.

CO2 and genotype affect salicylic acid levels in Arabidopsis thaliana rosettes. Wildtype (WT) and cyp20–3 plants were grown at ambient CO2 (aCO2, 450 ppm) and elevated CO2 (eCO2, 900 ppm). Rosettes were either left undamaged or wounded when plants reached growth stage 3.9 (Boyes et al., 2001). Salicylic acid (SA) was measured by ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Phytohormone levels in undamaged or damaged plants analyzed by 3-factor analysis-of-variance (ANOVA) (Factors: CO2, genotype, time) followed by Tukey HSD post-hoc test to identify significant differences (Supplementary Table 5). Expression of a SA-responsive gene, AtPR1, was measured by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). After normalization to the geometric mean of three reference genes, AtPR1 expression was analyzed by 3-factor analysis-of-variance (ANOVA) (Factors: CO2, genotype, time) followed by Tukey HSD post-hoc test to identify significant differences (Supplementary Table 6). Salicylic acid levels are higher at eCO2 and in the cyp20–3 mutant in (A) undamaged, and (B) wounded plants. Expression of AtPR1 is higher at eCO2 and in the cyp20–3 mutant in (C) undamaged, and (D) wounded plants. Data points represent the mean ± standard error.

Redox metabolites

At 90 minutes after damage, foliar rosettes were taken for redox metabolite and transcriptomic analyses. This timepoint represents a clear point where JA-Ile levels in wounded WT plants grown at eCO2 are lower than the other plants (Figure 1F) (Supplementary Table 5).

Levels of intermediates in the FHA cycle, particularly ascorbate and glutathione and their reduced or oxidized forms, are indicators of the cellular redox state and oxidative stress (Foyer and Noctor, 2011). At 90 minutes after wounding, levels of redox metabolites are responding to changing oxidative stress to reduce levels of reactive oxygen species such as H2O2 and are acting as signaling molecules leading to phytohormone biosynthesis, both jasmonates and SA (Han et al., 2013a, Mhamdi et al., 2010). At this timepoint, wounding did not affect levels or oxidation state of ascorbate or glutathione (Supplementary Table 7). Total ascorbate levels were lower at eCO2, but CO2 levels did not affect the ratio of oxidized (DHA)-to-reduced (Asc) ascorbate (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Three grouped bar graphs show ascorbate, oxidized glutathione (GSSG), and total glutathione levels in wild-type and cyp20-3 mutant plants under ambient and elevated CO2, plus unstressed and wounded conditions. Data are shown as means with error bars, and statistical significance is indicated with asterisks and number signs. Bars with black or grey shading display reduced versus oxidized forms of ascorbate and glutathione.

CO2 and genotype affect redox metabolite levels in Arabidopsis thaliana rosettes. Wildtype (WT) and cyp20–3 plants were grown at ambient CO2 (aCO2, 450 ppm) or elevated CO2 (eCO2, 900 ppm). Rosettes were either left undamaged or wounded when plants reached growth stage 3.9 (Boyes et al., 2001). Levels of redox metabolites were measured through spectrophotometric assays and analyzed by 3-factor analysis-of-variance (Factors: CO2, genotype, wounding) followed by Tukey HSD post-hoc test to identify significant differences (Supplementary Table 7). (A) Lower total ascorbate levels are observed in plants grown at eCO2, (B) Higher oxidized glutathione (GSSG) levels are observed in plants grown at eCO2 and in cyp20–3 mutants, and (C) The ratio of GSSG-to-reduced glutathione (GSH) is higher in plants grown at eCO2. Bars represent the mean ± standard error. An asterisk represents differences due to CO2 levels. A number sign represents genotype differences.

CO2 affected glutathione in the opposite way. Oxidized GSSG levels were higher in the cyp20–3 mutant plant, with this distinction more marked in plants grown at eCO2, as well as in arabidopsis grown at eCO2 (Figure 3B). This translated into a higher ratio of GSSG-to-GSH levels in plants grown at eCO2. (Figure 3C).

Gene expression

After removal of adaptors and low-quality reads, an average of 43.7 million 100 bp reads per sample with a Pfred score above 20 was obtained (Supplementary Table 8). These high-quality reads were aligned to the arabidopsis TAIR10 genome with an average mapping efficiency of 95.0% uniquely mapped reads (Supplementary Table 9).

In line with the lower JA-Ile levels in wounded WT plants grown at eCO2 (Figure 1F), a number of wound- or jasmonate-responsive genes, such as AtBCA3, AtGGCT2, AtLSU3, AtSERAT3, AtNAC061, AtMYB102, AtSHM7, AtKIN1, AtNCED3, AtADC2, AtCRK37, AtJMT, AtKIN2, AtCSLA1, and AtRD29A, had lower expression in wounded WT arabidopsis grown at eCO2 compared to aCO2 (Figure 4A) (Seo et al., 2001; Perez-Amador et al., 2002; Denekamp and Smeekens, 2003; Hossain et al., 2011; Hu et al., 2013; Choi et al., 2014; Thatcher et al., 2015; Hieno et al., 2019; Zander et al., 2020; Apodiakou and Hoefgen, 2023; Canales et al., 2023; Kaur et al., 2024). This eCO2-distinction seen in WT plants was disrupted in the cyp20–3 mutant (Figure 4B).

Figure 4.

Panel A displays a heatmap of gene expression in wild-type plants under ambient and elevated CO2, highlighting upregulation and downregulation for specific genes associated with stress responses; the right side lists gene names and related biological processes. Panel B shows a principal component analysis (PCA) plot differentiating wild-type and cyp20-3 mutant plant samples grown under ambient (red) and elevated (green) CO2, with distinct clustering indicating separation by genotype and CO2 conditions.

Wound-induced gene expression in WT Arabidopsis thaliana is attenuated in plants grown at eCO2. Wildtype (WT) arabidopsis were grown at ambient CO2 (aCO2, 450 ppm) or elevated CO2 (eCO2, 900 ppm). Rosettes were either left undamaged (U) or wounded (W) when plants reached growth stage 3.9 (Boyes et al., 2001). Total RNA was extracted for RNA-Seq (Supplementary Table 8). Wound-induced genes in WT plants grown at aCO2 (log2FC ≥ 2, ≤ -2, padj ≤ 0.05) were identified. From this list, genes differentially expressed between wounded WT plants grown at aCO2 and eCO2 were identified by DESeq2. (A) Heat map of genes downregulated in wounded WT grown at eCO2 compared to aCO2. KEGG and gene ontology (GO) terms were identified using www.genome.jp/kegg/ and GO enrichment analysis (Ashburner et al., 2000; Thomas et al., 2022; The Gene Ontology Consortium, 2026), respectively. Wound- and/or jasmonate-responsive genes are highlighted in bold. (B) Principal component analysis comparing the expression of these downregulated genes in WT (square) and cyp20-3 (circle) plants grown at aCO2 (red) or eCO2 (green). Abbreviations: ABA, abscisic acid; TF, transcription factor.

Some genes showed elevated expression in WT plants grown at eCO2 compared to aCO2 (Figure 5A); in this case, an enrichment of oxidative-stress related genes, such as AtMYB95, AtAGO4, At4g15270, AtMSRB7, AtMSRB9 and At5g36925 (Dos Santos et al., 2005; Mhamdi et al., 2010; Inzé et al., 2012; Waese and Provart, 2016) was observed. Of note, AtMDHAR which encodes monodehydroascorbate reductase which reduces monodehydroascorbate to AsA in the FHA cycle was upregulated in wounded WT plants grown at eCO2. AtPMZ (At3g28210), AtUGT73B5 (At2g15480) and At4g20860, genes identified as being jasmonate-independent, wound-responsive genes (Mekkaoui et al., 2025) also showed higher expression at eCO2 and in the cyp20–3 mutant, supporting our observations of increased oxidative stress gene expression in wounded plants grown at eCO2 (Figure 5B) (Supplementary Table 6).

Figure 5.

Heatmap on the left displays differential gene expression in wild type and cyp20-3 mutant Arabidopsis under ambient and elevated CO2, with upregulated genes marked in red and downregulated in blue; associated genes and biological processes are listed alongside. Line graphs on the right show time-course expression of AtPMZ, AtUGT73B5, and At4g20860, comparing wildtype and cyp20-3 under both CO2 conditions, with cyp20-3 exhibiting higher expression peaks.

Wound-induced gene expression increased in WT Arabidopsis thaliana plants grown at eCO2. Wildtype (WT) or cyp20–3 arabidopsis were grown at ambient CO2 (aCO2, 450 ppm) or elevated CO2 (eCO2, 900 ppm). Rosettes were either left undamaged or wounded when plants reached growth stage 3.9 (Boyes et al., 2001). Total RNA was extracted for RNA-Seq (Supplementary Table 8). From a list of wound-induced genes in WT plants grown at aCO2 (log FC ≥ 2, ≤ -2, padj ≤ 0.05) identified using DESeq2, differentially expressed genes between WT plants grown at aCO2 and eCO2 were determined. (A) Heat map of genes expressed at higher levels in wounded WT grown at eCO2 compared to aCO2. KEGG and gene ontology (GO) terms were identified using www.genome.jp/kegg/ and GO enrichment analysis (Ashburner et al., 2000; Thomas et al., 2022; The Gene Ontology Consortium, 2026), respectively. Oxidative stress-responsive genes are highlighted in bold. (B) Expression of jasmonate-independent, wound-responsive genes were measured by qRT-PCR. After normalization to the geometric mean of three reference genes, target gene expression was analyzed by 3-factor analysis-of-variance (ANOVA) (Factors: CO2, genotype, time) followed by Tukey HSD post-hoc test to identify significant differences (Supplementary Table 6). i) AtPMZ (At3g28210), ii) AtUGT73B5 (At2g15480), and iii) At4g20860. Gene expression levels are higher in wounded plants at eCO2 and in the cyp20–3 mutant (Supplementary Table 6). Data points represent the mean ± standard error. Temporal changes in wound-induced gene expression levels are denoted by alphabetical letters. Abbreviations: TF, transcription factor.

Of particular interest to OPDA metabolism, AtJID1 was wound-induced and upregulated at eCO2 (Figure 5A). AtJID1 encodes a 2-oxoglutarate/Fe(II)-dependent dioxygenase that modifies OPDA, limiting wound-induced accumulation of OPDA, JA and JA-Ile when overexpressed (Yi et al., 2023). Thus, although OPDA levels were unaffected by the CO2 level, OPDA catabolism initiated by JID1 may be increased at eCO2 which would limit JA and JA-Ile biosynthesis.

Discussion

The wound-induced increase in jasmonates is attenuated in C3 plants grown at eCO2 which may lead to lower plant resistance against necrotrophic pathogens and chewing insect herbivores under future predicted environmental conditions (Bazinet et al., 2022 and references therein). Levels of JA-Ile are lower in wounded rosette leaves of arabidopsis grown at eCO2 compared to those grown at aCO2, but this CO2-dependent difference is not seen in the levels of their precursor OPDA, suggesting that OPDA may be blocked from continuing into jasmonate biosynthesis (Figures 1D, F). Our results suggest that CYP20–3 affects the wound-induced jasmonate biosynthesis in arabidopsis grown at eCO2 through two related mechanisms. First, OPDA binding to CYP20–3 limits OPDA flux into JA-Ile biosynthesis. In addition, this interaction promotes the production of glutathione, which buffers changes in cellular redox state to mute signaling leading to jasmonate biosynthesis (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Side-by-side schematic diagrams compare metabolic and signaling pathways under ambient CO2 (aCO2, left) and elevated CO2 (eCO2, right). Both illustrate the roles of Cyp20-3, OASTL-B, and SAT1 in OPDA signaling, cysteine, and glutathione biosynthesis in response to wounding. Under eCO2, pathways involving NADPH, Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle, photorespiration, and JA-Ile biosynthesis show altered connections and inhibitory (red arrows) or stimulatory (green arrows) effects compared to ambient CO2 conditions.

Model of CYP20-3-mediated suppression of the wound-induced jasmonate burst in C3 plants grown at eCO2. Increased atmospheric CO2 favours the carboxylation reaction of ribulose 1, 5-bisphosphate, enhancing the Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle and reducing photorespiration. This could increase the availability of electrons from the photosynthetic electron chain to be passed to CYP20-3. In the presence of wound-associated 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid (OPDA), a complex is formed between CYP20-3-OPDA-SAT1-OASTL-B that stimulates cysteine biosynthesis. Cysteine is a residue in the tripeptide glutathione and increased levels of glutathione may dampen jasmonate biosynthesis. (A) aCO2. (B) eCO2. Green and red arrows represents processes enhanced or decreased at eCO2. Thickness of arrows represent the proposed strength into different pathways. aCO2, ambient CO2; C, carbon; eCO2, elevated CO2; Fd, ferredoxin; JA-Ile, jasmonoyl-isoleucine; NADPH, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; OASTL-B O-acetylserine(thiol)lyase-B; OPDA, 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid; pETC, photosynthetic electron transport chain; SAT1, S-adenosylmethionine acetyltransferase 1.

Upon reduction by electrons from the pETC, CYP20–3 binds to OPDA forming a complex with SAT1 and OASTL-B (CYP20-3-OPDA-SAT1-OASTL-B), potentially limiting OPDA flux into jasmonate biosynthesis which was confirmed in our study (Liu and Park, 2021); OPDA levels are lower in wounded cyp20–3 plants with higher JA levels observed in cyp20–3 grown at eCO2 (Figures 1D, E). This suggests that in arabidopsis grown at eCO2 increased binding of CYP20–3 to OPDA blocks flux into downstream jasmonate biosynthesis. Another possible point of regulation of OPDA into JA-Ile production is through the action of the 2-oxoglutarate/Fe(II)-dependent dioxygenase JID1 that modifies OPDA, limiting wound-induced accumulation of OPDA, JA and JA-Ile when overexpressed in arabidopsis (Yi et al., 2023). We observed that AtJID1 is wound-induced and upregulated at eCO2 (Figure 5A), suggesting that the enzyme may limit OPDA conversion to JA-Ile, but this needs to be experimentally validated. It is also noteworthy that JA-Ile, but not JA, levels are lower in WT plants grown at eCO2 (Figure 1F), suggesting there is likely another block in JA-Ile biosynthesis between JA and JA-Ile.

Binding of OPDA to form the CYP20-3-OPDA-SAT1-OASTL-B complex not only removes OPDA from jasmonate biosynthesis but promotes cysteine biosynthesis leading to the production of the redox metabolite glutathione (Cheong et al., 2017; Liu and Park, 2021). Cysteine is needed for the biosynthesis of the tripepeptide redox metabolite glutathione (glutamate-cysteine-glycine) (Liu and Park, 2021; Takahashi, 2011). We did not see a change in reduced or total glutathione levels, but GSSG and the ratio of GSSG-to-GSH are higher in plants grown at eCO2 suggesting that eCO2 leads to a more oxidized cellular environment (Figures 3B, C). In addition, cyp20–3 plants had higher GSSG levels than WT, particularly when grown at eCO2 (Figure 3B), suggesting that CYP20-3-associated glutathione production leads to a more reduced cellular environment.

Changes in the oxidation state or levels of these redox metabolites provide information on the cellular redox state and are involved in the regulation of various signaling pathways, including phytohormone biosynthesis (Foyer and Noctor, 2011). At 90 minutes post-wounding, a strong CO2-dependent difference in foliar cellular redox metabolites is noted (Figure 3); specifically, lower total ascorbate and higher oxidized glutathione (GSSG) levels in arabidopsis grown at eCO2 compared to aCO2. This increased oxidative environment is reflected in wound-induced, oxidative stress genes upregulated in both WT and cyp20–3 plants (Figure 5).

Plant stresses can perturbate cellular redox status leading to changes in phytohormone SA and JA levels, that, in turn, affects redox metabolite levels and ratios (Foyer and Noctor, 2011). In arabidopsis, higher SA levels are often correlated with increased total and oxidized glutathione levels (Han et al., 2013a), which suggests that genotype- and CO2-dependent increases in GSSG may manifest in higher observed levels of foliar SA and expression of the SA-responsive gene AtPR1 (Figures 2, 3B, C). The crosstalk between jasmonate and SA signaling in plant stress responses is well established (Caarls et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2015; Aerts et al., 2021; Hou and Tsuda, 2022). Thus, the enhanced foliar SA levels may contribute to the lower wound-associated jasmonate levels in arabidopsis grown at eCO2 (Figures 1F, 4A, B). As well, higher expression of the SA-responsive AtWRKY62 is noted in wounded plants grown at eCO2 compared to those grown at aCO2 (Figure 5A). This transcription factor interferes with jasmonate signaling and the induction of jasmonate-responsive gene expression (Mao et al., 2007). However, both jasmonate and SA levels were higher in cyp20–3 than in WT at eCO2, suggesting that SA-mediated antagonism of jasmonate biosynthesis cannot fully explain the eCO2 attenuation of wound-associated JA-Ile.

Changes in cellular reduced GSH and AsA levels are thought to positively stimulate jasmonate biosynthesis and/or signaling (Han et al., 2013b; Suza et al., 2010). Even in the absence of wounding, oxidative stress induced by increased production of H2O2 can activate jasmonate-responsive gene expression through a GSH-dependent mechanism (Han et al., 2013b). Treatment of arabidopsis with AsA or plants with elevated AsA levels have increased foliar jasmonate levels (Nepal et al., 2019; Bulley et al., 2021). However, wounding- or jasmonate treatment have also been seen to increase foliar ascorbate levels in some plant species (Suza et al., 2010). In our study, ascorbate levels were reduced in arabidopsis leaves grown at aCO2 (Figure 3A); this may contribute to the lower wound-associated JA-Ile levels observed in WT plants grown at eCO2 or the lower JA-Ile levels in these plants may lead to lower ascorbate levels.

JA levels were higher in wounded cyp20–3 plants grown at eCO2 compared to mutant plants grown at aCO2 or WT plants grown at either CO2 level (Figure 1E). At 90 min after wounding, JA-Ile levels in plants grown at eCO2 was notably lower than in plants grown at aCO2, this was particularly pronounced in WT plants (Figure 1F). This attenuation of the wound-induced jasmonate burst was reflected in lower wound- and jasmonate-responsive gene expression in plants grown at eCO2 compared with aCO2, a distinction abolished in the cyp20–3 mutants (Figure 4).

Increased cysteine levels in stomatal guard cells may lead to the increased sulfation of molybdenum by the molybdenum cofactor sulfurase ABA3 (Watanabe et al., 2018). The resultant compound, molybdenum disulfide, is the cofactor for Arabidopsis aldehyde oxidase 3 (AAO3), which catalyses the conversion of abscisic aldehyde to ABA (Seo et al., 2000). Thus, stress-related increases in OPDA results in ABA biosynthesis in guard cells (Sun et al., 2025). Contrary to these findings, in wounded arabidopsis leaves, we see higher ABA levels in the cyp20–3 mutant which likely reflects cell type-specific differences.

Conclusions

In response to recognition of necrotrophic pathogens or chewing insect herbivores, a strong, robust increase in jasmonates leads to plant resistance (Koo and Howe, 2009; Li et al., 2022). However, this jasmonate burst is attenuated in some C3 plants grown at future predicted atmospheric eCO2 levels (Bazinet et al., 2022 and references therein). Given the importance of jasmonate signaling in plant resistance, understanding the underlying mechanism(s) is critical.

Even though foliar levels of JA and/or JA-Ile are lower in wounded arabidopsis grown at eCO2, levels of the precursor to these jasmonates, OPDA, are not affected by the atmospheric CO2 level. Thus, we focused on the role of the OPDA-binding protein CYP20–3 in regulating stress-associated jasmonate levels at eCO2. Our results suggest that CYP20–3 has a two-tier role in regulating wound-associated jasmonate biosynthesis in C3 plants grown at eCO2. First, we propose that the decreased photorespiration of C3 plants in the presence of eCO2 increases the availability of electrons from the pETC to be passed to CYP20-3, activating the formation of the CYP20-3-OPDA-SAT1-OASTL-B complex to limit OPDA flux into JA-Ile biosynthesis in wounded plants. Secondly, through the action of the CYP20-3-OPDA-SAT1-OASTL-B complex, cysteine biosynthesis is enhanced that leads to glutathione to buffer changes in the cellular redox state and limit the wound-associated activation of jasmonate biosynthesis. Although there is variability reported (Bazinet et al., 2022), decreased resistance to necrotrophic pathogens and caterpillar herbivory that correlate to lower induced JA and JA-Ile levels has been reported in diverse C3 plant species grown at eCO2, such as tomato, melon, rice and alfalfa (Guo et al., 2012; Lu et al., 2018; Hu et al., 2020; Johnson et al., 2020; Zhang et al, 2020), suggesting that the proposed CYP20-3-OPDA regulatory mechanism may be conserved in C3 crops.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Centre (ABRC) for WT and cyp20–3 germplasm. We are also grateful to Genome Québec for the preparation and sequencing of RNA libraries and Compute Canada and the Digital Alliance of Canada (alliancecan.ca) for computational support. We thank reviewers for their insightful comments.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. We are grateful to our funding sources for supporting this research: the German Research Foundation (DFG-FTZ 118, 202548816; JG, NMvD) and the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery grants (2019-04516; JCB) and the Fonds de recherche du Québec – nature et technologies (FRQNT) Centre SÈVE (RQT00335) to JCB. We gratefully acknowledge the FRQNT scholarship (332081) to AR.

Edited by: Hassan Iqbal, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China

Reviewed by: Zilong Tan, Qilu Normal University, China

Thang Tran, Ho Chi Minh City University of Science, Vietnam

Abbreviations: ABA, abscisic acid; aCO2, ambient CO2 (450 ppm); ANOVA, analysis of variance; AsA, reduced ascorbate; Asc, total ascorbate; CBB, Calvin-Benson-Bassham; CO2, carbon dioxide; CYP20-3, cyclophilin 20-3; DHA, dehydroascorbate (oxidized ascorbate); eCO2, elevated CO2 (900 ppm); EDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; FHA, Foyer-Halliwell-Asada; GSH, reduced glutathione; GSSG, oxidized glutathione; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; JA, jasmonic acid; JA-Ile, jasmonoyl-isoleucine; JAZ, jasmonate-Zim domain; NADPH, reduced form of nicotinamide adenine nucleotide phosphate; OASTL-B, O-acetylserine (thiol) lyase B; OPDA, 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid; pETC, photosynthetic electron transport chain; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SA, salicylic acid; SAT1, serine acetyltransferase 1; WT, wildtype.

Data availability statement

All data generated from this research are presented in the results or are available in the Supplementary Material of this article. Raw read data (FASTQ) have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (Bioproject ID PRJNA1332053).

Author contributions

AR: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Conceptualization, Methodology. JG: Methodology, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. ND: Methodology, Supervision, Resources, Writing – review & editing. JB: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2026.1725249/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure 1

CYP20–3 transcript and protein levels. Arabidopsis thaliana, wildtype (WT) and cyp20-3 (cyp) were grown at ambient (aCO2, 450 ppm) or elevated (eCO2, 900 ppm) carbon dioxide. Rosettes were either left undamaged or wounded when plants reached growth stage 3.9 (Boyes et al., 2001). (A) AtCYP20–3 expression measured by RNA-Seq. (B) Western blot. Proteins were extracted from frozen rosettes and equal masses of protein were separated by SDS-PAGE. A molecular weight marker was included in the first well: Spectra Multicolor Broad Range Protein Ladder (Thermo Fisher). CYP20-3 (20 kDa) was detected by immunoblot with an anti-CYP20–3 antibody (PhytoAB).

Image1.tiff (233.7KB, tiff)
Supplementary Figure 2

Arabidopsis thaliana cyp20–3 plants are smaller than wildtype. Wildtype (WT) and cyp20–3 plants were grown at ambient CO2 (aCO2, 450 ppm) and elevated CO2 (eCO2, 900 ppm). Rosettes were either left undamaged (U) or wounded (W) when plants reached growth stage 3.9 (Boyes et al., 2001). Biomass was analyzed by 2-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) (Factors: CO2, genotype) followed by Tukey HSD post-hoc test to identify significant differences. (A) WT and cyp20–3 mutants grown at aCO2 or eCO2. (B) cyp20–3 were 38% smaller than WT (F(1,68) = 45.03, p < 0.001; Supplementary Table 3); on average, 20% of rosette biomass was removed by wounding the largest 7 rosette leaves on individual plants with a hole punch ensuring that the midvein was not damaged (Supplementary Table 4). Bar graphs represent the mean ± the standard error. Number signs (#) represent differences between unwounded and wounded plants. Asterisks (*) represent genotype differences at each CO2 level.

Image2.tiff (732.8KB, tiff)
Supplementary Figure 3

CO2 and genotype affect abscisic acid levels in Arabidopsis thaliana rosettes. Wildtype (WT) and cyp20–3 plants were grown at ambient CO2 (aCO2, 450 ppm) and elevated CO2 (eCO2, 900 ppm). Rosettes were either left undamaged or wounded when plants reached growth stage 3.9 (Boyes et al., 2001). Abscisic acid (ABA) was measured by ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Phytohormone levels in undamaged or damaged plants were analyzed by 3-factor analysis-of-variance (ANOVA) (Factors: CO2, genotype, time) followed by Tukey HSD post-hoc tests to identify significant differences (Supplementary Table 5). ABA levels are (A) lower in undamaged WT plants grown at eCO2, and (B) higher in cyp20–3 compared to WT in wounded plants. Data points represent the mean ± standard error. The temporal increase in ABA levels in response to wounding is indicated by alphabetical letters.

Image3.tiff (83.3KB, tiff)
Table1.xlsx (6MB, xlsx)

References

  1. Aerts N., Pereira Mendes M., Van Wees S. C. M. (2021). Multiple levels of crosstalk in hormone networks regulating plant defense. Plant J. 105, 489–504. doi:  10.1111/tpj.15124. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews S., Krueger F., Segonds-Pichon A., Biggins L., Krueger C., Wingett S. (2010). FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Available online at: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (Accessed August 31, 2025).
  3. Apodiakou A., Hoefgen R. (2023). New insights into the regulation of plant metabolism by O-acetylserine: Sulfate and beyond. J. Exp. Bot. 74, 3361–3378. doi:  10.1093/jxb/erad124. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aranda P. S., Lajoie D. M., Jorcyk C. L. (2012). Bleach gel: A simple agarose gel for analyzing RNA quality. Electrophoresis 33, 366–369. doi:  10.1002/elps.201100335. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ashburner M., Ball C. A., Blake J. A., Botstein D., Butler H., Cherry J. M., et al. (2000). Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29. doi:  10.1038/75556. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bazinet Q., Tang L., Bede J. C. (2022). Impact of future elevated carbon dioxide on C3 plant resistance to biotic stresses. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 35, 527–539. doi:  10.1094/MPMI-07-21-0189-FI. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bede J. C., Blande J. D. (2025). Effects of elevated CO2 and O3 on aboveground Brassicaceous plant-insect interactions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 70, 205–227. doi:  10.1146/annurev-ento-022024-015159. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Boyes D. C., Zayed A. M., Ascenzi R., McCaskill A. J., Hoffman N. E., Davis K. R., et al. (2001). Growth stage–based phenotypic analysis of Arabidopsis: A model for high throughput functional genomics in plants. Plant Cell 13, 1499–1510. doi:  10.1105/TPC.010011. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bulley S. M., Cooney J. M., Laing W. (2021). Elevating ascorbate in Arabidopsis stimulates the production of abscisic acid, phaseic acid and to a lesser extent auxin (IAA) and jasmonates, resulting in increased expression of DHAR1 and multiple transcription factors associated with abiotic stress tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 6743. doi:  10.3390/ijms22136743. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Caarls L., Pieterse C. M. J., Van Wees S. C. M. (2015). How salicylic acid takes transcriptional control over jasmonic acid signaling. Front. Plant Sci. 6. doi:  10.3389/fpls.2015.00170. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Canales J., Arenas-M A., Medina J., Vidal E. A. (2023). A revised view of the LSU gene family: New functions in plant stress responses and phytohormone signaling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 2819. doi:  10.3390/ijms24032819. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen S., Zhou Y., Chen Y., Gu J. (2018). Fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890. doi:  10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheng M.-C., Ko K., Chang W.-L., Kuo W.-C., Chen G.-H., Lin T.-P. (2015). Increased glutathione contributes to stress tolerance and global translational changes in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 83, 926–939. doi:  10.1111/tpj.12940. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cheong H., Barbosa Dos Santos I., Liu W., Gosse H. N., Park S.-W. (2017). Cyclophilin 20–3 is positioned as a regulatory hub between light-dependent redox and 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid signaling. Plant Signaling Behav. 12, e1362520. doi:  10.1080/15592324.2017.1362520. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chini A., Boter M., Solano R. (2009). Plant oxylipins: COI1/JAZs/MYC2 as the core jasmonic acid-signalling module. FEBS J. 276, 4682–4692. doi:  10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07194.x. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Choi J., Tanaka K., Cao Y., Qi Y., Qiu J., Liang Y., et al. (2014). Identification of a plant receptor for extracellular ATP. Science 343, 290–294. doi:  10.1126/science.343.6168.290. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Denekamp M., Smeekens S. C. (2003). Integration of wounding and osmotic stress signals determines the expression of the AtMYB102 transcription factor gene. Plant Physiol. 132, 1415–1423. doi:  10.1104/pp.102.019273. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dobin A., Davis C. A., Schlesinger F., Drenkow J., Zaleski C., Jha S., et al. (2013). STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-Seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21. doi:  10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dominguez-Solis J. R., He Z., Lima A., Ting J., Buchanan B. B., Luan S. (2008). A cyclophilin links redox and light signals to cysteine biosynthesis and stress responses in chloroplasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 16386–16391. doi:  10.1073/pnas.0808204105. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dos Santos C. V., Cuineí S. P., Rouhier N., Rey P. (2005). The Arabidopsis plastidic methionine sulfoxide reductase B proteins. Sequence and activity characteristics, comparison of the expression with plastidic methionine sulfoxide reductase A, and induction by photooxidative stress. Plant Physiol. 138, 909–922. doi:  10.1104/pp.105.062430. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fichman Y., Mittler R. (2021). A systemic whole-plant change in redox levels accompanies the rapid systemic response to wounding. Plant Physiol. 186, 4–8. doi:  10.1093/plphys/kiab022. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Foyer C. H., Noctor G. (2011). Ascorbate and glutathione: The heart of the redox hub. Plant Physiol. 155, 2–18. doi:  10.1104/pp.110.167569. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Foyer C. H., Noctor G. (2013). Redox signaling in plants. Antioxidants Redox Signaling 18, 2087–2090. doi:  10.1089/ars.2013.5278. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gene Ontology Consortium (2026). The gene ontology knowledgebase in 2026. Nucleic Acids Res. 54, D1779–D1792. doi:  10.1093/nar/gkaf1292. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Guo H., Sun Y., Ren Q., Zhu-Salzman K., Kang L., Wang C., et al. (2012). Elevated CO2 reduces the resistance and tolerance of tomato plants to Helicoverpa armigera by suppressing the JA signaling pathway. PLoS One 7, e41426. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0041426, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Han Y., Chaouch S., Mhamdi A., Queval G., Zechmann B., Noctor G. (2013. a). Functional analysis of arabidopsis mutants points to novel roles for glutathione in coupling H2O2 to activation of salicylic acid accumulation and signaling. Antioxidants Redox Signaling 18, 2106–2121. doi:  10.1089/ars.2012.5052. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Han Y., Mhamdi A., Chaouch S., Noctor G. (2013. b). Regulation of basal and oxidative stress‐triggered jasmonic acid‐related gene expression by glutathione. Plant Cell Environ. 36, 1135–1146. doi:  10.1111/pce.12048. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hieno A., Naznin H. A., Inaba-Hasegawa K., Yokogawa T., Hayami N., Nomoto M., et al. (2019). Transcriptome analysis and identification of a transcriptional regulatory network in the response to H2O2. Plant Physiol. 180, 1629–1646. doi:  10.1104/pp.18.01426. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hossain M. A., Munemasa S., Uraji M., Nakamura Y., Mori I. C., Murata Y. (2011). Involvement of endogenous abscisic acid in methyl jasmonate-induced stomatal closure in arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 156, 430–438. doi:  10.1104/pp.111.172254. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hou S., Tsuda K. (2022). Salicylic acid and jasmonic acid crosstalk in plant immunity. Essays Biochem. 66, 647–656. doi:  10.1042/EBC20210090, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hu Y., Jiang L., Wang F., Yu D. (2013). Jasmonate regulates the INDUCER OF CBF EXPRESSION-C-REPEAT BINDING FACTOR/DRE BINDING FACTOR1 cascade and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25, 2907–2924. doi:  10.1105/tpc.113.112631. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hu Z., Sun Z., Ma Q., Yang X., Feng S., Shao S., et al. (2020). N-decanoyl-homoserine lactone alleviates elevated CO2-induced defense suppression to Botrytis cinerea in tomato. Sci. Hortic. 268, 109353. doi:  10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109353. PMID: 41836151 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Inzé A., Vanderauwera S., Hoeberichts F. A., Vandorpe M., Van Gaever T., van Breusegem F. (2012). A subcellular localization compendium of hydrogen peroxide-induced proteins. Plant Cell Environ. 35, 308–320. doi:  10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02323.x. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Johnson S. N., Waterman J. M., Hall C. R. (2020). Increased insect herbivore performance under elevated CO2 is associated with lower plant defence signalling and minimal declines in nutritional quality. Sci. Rep. 10, 14553. doi:  10.1038/s41598-020-70823-3. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jung C., Lyou S. H., Yeu S., Kim M. A., Rhee S., Kim M., et al. (2007). Microarray-based screening of jasmonate-responsive genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep. 26, 1053–1063. doi:  10.1007/s00299-007-0311-1. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kaur D., Schedl A., Lafleur C., Henao J. M., van Dam N. M., Rivoal J., et al. (2024). Arabidopsis transcriptomics reveals the role of lipoxygenase2 (AtLOX2) in wound-induced responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, 5898. doi:  10.3390/ijms25115898. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Koo A. J., Howe G. A. (2009). The wound hormone jasmonate. Phytochemistry 70, 1571–1580. doi:  10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.07.018. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Leakey A. D. B., Ainsworth E. A., Bernacchi C. J., Rogers A., Long S. P., Ort D. R. (2009). Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: Six important lessons from FACE. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 2859–2876. doi:  10.1093/jxb/erp096. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lee J.-Y., Marotzke J., Bala G., Cao L., Corti S., Dunne J. P., et al. (2021). “ Future global climate: scenario-based projections and near-term information,” in Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; ), 553–672. [Google Scholar]
  40. Li C., Xu M., Cai X., Han Z., Si J., Chen D. (2022). Jasmonate signaling pathway modulates plant defense, growth, and their trade-offs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 3945. doi:  10.3390/ijms23073945. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Liao Y., Smyth G. K., Shi W. (2013). Featurecounts: An efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930. doi:  10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Liu P., Ewald J., Pang Z., Legrand E., Jeon Y. S., Sangiovanni J., et al. (2023). ExpressAnalyst: A unified platform for RNA-sequencing analysis in non-model species. Nat. Commun. 14, 2995. doi:  10.1038/s41467-023-38785-y. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Liu W., Park S.-W. (2021). 12-Oxo-phytodienoic acid: A fuse and/or switch of plant growth and defense responses? Front. Plant Sci. 12. doi:  10.3389/fpls.2021.724079. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Love M. I., Huber W., Anders S. (2014). Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-Seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550. doi:  10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lu C., Qi J., Hettenhausen C., Lei Y., Zhang J., Zhang M., et al. (2018). Elevated CO2 differentially affects tobacco and rice defense against lepidopteran larvae via the jasmonic acid signaling pathway. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 60, 412–431. doi:  10.1111/jipb.12633. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Machado R. A. R., Ferrieri A. P., Robert C. A. M., Glauser G., Kallenbach M., Baldwin I. T., et al. (2013). Leaf-herbivore attack reduces carbon reserves and regrowth from the roots via jasmonate and auxin signaling. New Phytol. 200, 1234–1246. doi:  10.1111/nph.12438. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Mao P., Duan M., Wei C., Li Y. (2007). WRKY62 transcription factor acts downstream of cytosolic NPR1 and negatively regulates jasmonate-responsive gene expression. Plant Cell Physiol. 48, 833–842. doi:  10.1093/pcp/pcm058. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Martinez Henao J., Demers L. E., Grosser K., Schedl A., van Dam N. M., Bede J. C. (2020). Fertilizer rate-associated increase in foliar jasmonate burst observed in wounded Arabidopsis thaliana leaves is attenuated at eCO2. Front. Plant Sci. 10. doi:  10.3389/fpls.2019.01636. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Mekkaoui K., Baral R., Smith F., Klein M., Feussner I., Hause B. (2025). Transcriptomics and trans-organellar complementation reveal limited signaling of 12-cis-oxo-phytodienoic acid during early wound response in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 16, 6684. doi:  10.1038/s41467-025-61832-9. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Mhamdi A., Hager J., Chaouch S., Queval G., Han Y., Taconnat L., et al. (2010). Arabidopsis GLUTATHIONE REDUCTASE1 plays a crucial role in leaf responses to intracellular hydrogen peroxide and in ensuring appropriate gene expression through both salicylic acid and jasmonic acid signaling pathways. Plant Physiol. 153, 1144–1160. doi:  10.1104/pp.110.153767. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Mhamdi A., Noctor G. (2016). High CO2 primes plant biotic stress defences through redox-linked pathways. Plant Physiol. 172, 929–942. doi:  10.1104/pp.16.01129. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Nepal N., Yactayo-Chang J. P., Medina-Jiménez K., Acosta-Gamboa L. M., González-Romero M. E., Arteaga-Vázquez M. A., et al. (2019). Mechanisms underlying the enhanced biomass and abiotic stress tolerance phenotype of an Arabidopsis MIOX over-expresser. Plant Direct 3, 1–27. doi:  10.1002/pld3.165. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Noctor G., Cohen M., Trémulot L., Châtel-Innocenti G., Van Breusegem F., Mhamdi A. (2024). Glutathione: A key modulator of plant defence and metabolism through multiple mechanisms. J. Exp. Bot. 75, 4549–4572. doi:  10.1093/jxb/erae194. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Noctor G., Mhamdi A. (2022). “ Quantitative measurement of ascorbate and glutathione by spectrophotometry,” in Reactive oxygen species in plants: methods and protocols. Ed. Mhamdi A. ( Springer US, New York, NY: ), 87–96. doi:  10.1007/978-1-0716-2469-2_6, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Nowak R. S., Ellsworth D. S., Smith S. D. (2004). Functional responses of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2– Do photosynthetic and productivity data from FACE experiments support early predictions? New Phytol. 162, 253–280. doi:  10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01033.x. PMID: 41834780 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Pang Z., Lu Y., Zhou G., Hui F., Xu L., Viau C., et al. (2024). MetaboAnalyst 6.0: Towards a unified platform for metabolomics data processing, analysis and interpretation. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, W398–W406. doi:  10.1093/nar/gkae253. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Park S.-W., Li W., Viehhauser A., He B., Kim S., Nilsson A. K., et al. (2013). Cyclophilin 20–3 relays a 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid signal during stress responsive regulation of cellular redox homeostasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 9559–9564. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1218872110. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Perez-Amador M. A., Leon J., Green P. J., Carbonell J. (2002). Induction of the arginine decarboxylase ADC2 gene provides evidence for the involvement of polyamines in the wound response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 130, 1454–1463. doi:  10.1104/pp.009951. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Prasad A., Sedlářová M., Balukova A., Rác M., Pospíšil P. (2020). Reactive oxygen species as a response to wounding: In vivo imaging in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 10. doi:  10.3389/fpls.2019.01660. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Seo H. S., Song J. T., Cheong J. J., Lee Y.-H., Lee Y.-W., Hwang I., et al. (2001). Jasmonic acid carboxyl methyltransferase: A key enzyme for jasmonate-regulated plant responses. PNAS 98, 4788–4793. doi:  10.1073/pnas.081557298. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Seo M., Peeters A. J., Koiwai H., Oritani T., Marion-Poll A., Zeevart J. A. D., et al. (2000). The Arabidopsis aldehyde oxidase 3 (AAO3) gene product catalyzes the final step in abscisic acid biosynthesis in leaves. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97, 12908–120913. doi:  10.1073/pnas.220426197. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Stefansky W. (1971). Rejecting outliers by maximum normed residual. Ann. Math. Stat. 42, 35–45. Available online at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2958460 (Accessed March 24, 2025). [Google Scholar]
  63. Sun S. K., Ahmad N., Callenius H., Rajab H., Uslu V. V., Cruz J. R. C., et al. (2025). The plastid cysteine synthase complex regulates ABA biosynthesis an stomatal closure in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 16, 8960. doi:  10.1038/s41467-025-64705-3. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Suza W. P., Avila C. A., Carruthers K., Kulkarni S., Goggin F. L., Lorence A. (2010). Exploring the impact of wounding and jasmonates on ascorbate metabolism. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 48, 337–350. doi:  10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.02.004. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Takahashi H. (2011). Sulfur assimilation in photosynthetic organisms: Molecular functions and regulations of transporters and assimilatory enzymes. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 62, 157. doi:  10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103921. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Taki N., Sasaki-Sekimoto Y., Obayashi T., Kikuta A., Kobayashi K., Ainai T., et al. (2005). 12-Oxo-phytodienoic acid triggers expression of a distinct set of genes and plays a role in wound-induced gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 139, 1268–1283. doi:  10.1104/pp.105.067058. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Taylor S. C., Nadeau K., Abbasi M., Lachance C., Nguyen M., Fenrich J. (2019). The ultimate qPCR experiment: Producing publication quality, reproducible data the first time. Trends Biotechnol. 37, 761–774. doi:  10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.12.002. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Thatcher L. F., Kamphuis L. G., Hane J. K., Oñate-Sánchez L., Singh K. B. (2015). The Arabidopsis KH-Domain RNA-binding protein ESR1 functions in components of jasmonate signalling, Unlinking growth restraint and resistance to stress. PLoS One 10, e0126978. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0126978. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Thomas P. D., Ebert D., Muraganujan A., Mushayahama T., Albou L. P., Mi H. (2022). PANTHER: Making genome-scale phylogenetics accessible to all. Protein Sci. 31, 8–22. doi:  10.1002/pro.4218. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Vandesompele J., De Preter K., Pattyn F., Poppe B., Van Roy N., De Paepe A., et al. (2002). Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 3, Research0034. doi:  10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Waese J., Provart N. J. (2016). The bio-analytic resource: Data visualization and analytic tools for multiple levels of plant biology. Curr. Plant Biol. 7-8, 2–5. doi:  10.1016/j.cpb.2016.12.001. PMID: 41836151 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Ward J. K., Kelly J. K. (2004). Scaling up evolutionary responses to elevated CO2: Lessons from Arabidopsis. Ecol. Lett. 7, 427–440. doi:  10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00589.x. PMID: 41834780 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Wasternack C., Hause B. (2013). Jasmonates: Biosynthesis, perception, signal transduction and action in plant stress response, growth and development. An update to the 2007 review in Annals of Botany. Ann. Bot. 111, 1021–1058. doi:  10.1093/aob/mct067. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Wasternack C., Strnad M. (2018). Jasmonates: News on occurrence, biosynthesis, metabolism and action of an ancient group of signaling compounds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 2539. doi:  10.3390/ijms19092539. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Watanabe S., Sato M., Sawada Y., Tanaka M., Matsui A., Kanno Y., et al. (2018). Arabidopsis molybdenum cofactor sulfurase ABA3 contributes to anthocyanin accumulation and oxidative stress tolerance in ABA-dependent and independent ways. Sci. Rep. 8, 16592. doi:  10.1038/s41598-018-34862-1. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Xie F., Wang J., Zhang B. (2023). Reffinder: A web-based tool for comprehensively analyzing and identifying reference genes. Funct. Integr. Genomics 23, 125. doi:  10.1007/s10142-023-01055-7. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Weech M.-H., Chapleau M., Pan L., Ide C., Bede J. C. (2008). Caterpillar saliva interferes with induced Arabidopsis thaliana defence responses via the systemic acquired resistance pathway. J. Exp. Botany. 59, 2437–2448. doi:  10.1093/jxb/ern108. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Yang Y.-X., Ahmmed G. J., Wu C., Fan S., Zhou Y.-H. (2015). Crosstalk among jasmonate, salicylate and ethylene signaling pathways in plant disease and immune responses. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 16, 450–461. doi:  10.2174/1389203716666150330141638. PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Yi R., Du R., Wang J., Yan J., Chu J., Yan J., et al. (2023). Dioxygenase JID1 mediates the modification of OPDA to regulate jasmonate homeostasis. Cell Discov. 9, 39. doi:  10.1038/s41421-023-00530-6. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Zander M., Lewsey M. G., Clark N. M., Yin L., Bartlett A., Saldierna Guzmán J. P., et al. (2020). Integrated multi-omics framework of the plant response to jasmonic acid. Nat. Plants 6, 290–302. doi:  10.1038/s41477-020-0605-7. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Zhang Q., Dai W., Wang X., Li J. (2020). Elevated CO2 concentration affects the defense of tobacco and melon against lepidopteran larvae through the jasmonic acid signaling pathways. Sci. Rep. 10, 4060. doi:  10.1038/s41598-020-60749-1, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Zhao S., Fernald R. D. (2005). Comprehensive algorithm for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. J. Comput. Biol. 12, 1047–1064. doi:  10.1089/cmb.2005.12.1047. PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure 1

CYP20–3 transcript and protein levels. Arabidopsis thaliana, wildtype (WT) and cyp20-3 (cyp) were grown at ambient (aCO2, 450 ppm) or elevated (eCO2, 900 ppm) carbon dioxide. Rosettes were either left undamaged or wounded when plants reached growth stage 3.9 (Boyes et al., 2001). (A) AtCYP20–3 expression measured by RNA-Seq. (B) Western blot. Proteins were extracted from frozen rosettes and equal masses of protein were separated by SDS-PAGE. A molecular weight marker was included in the first well: Spectra Multicolor Broad Range Protein Ladder (Thermo Fisher). CYP20-3 (20 kDa) was detected by immunoblot with an anti-CYP20–3 antibody (PhytoAB).

Image1.tiff (233.7KB, tiff)
Supplementary Figure 2

Arabidopsis thaliana cyp20–3 plants are smaller than wildtype. Wildtype (WT) and cyp20–3 plants were grown at ambient CO2 (aCO2, 450 ppm) and elevated CO2 (eCO2, 900 ppm). Rosettes were either left undamaged (U) or wounded (W) when plants reached growth stage 3.9 (Boyes et al., 2001). Biomass was analyzed by 2-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) (Factors: CO2, genotype) followed by Tukey HSD post-hoc test to identify significant differences. (A) WT and cyp20–3 mutants grown at aCO2 or eCO2. (B) cyp20–3 were 38% smaller than WT (F(1,68) = 45.03, p < 0.001; Supplementary Table 3); on average, 20% of rosette biomass was removed by wounding the largest 7 rosette leaves on individual plants with a hole punch ensuring that the midvein was not damaged (Supplementary Table 4). Bar graphs represent the mean ± the standard error. Number signs (#) represent differences between unwounded and wounded plants. Asterisks (*) represent genotype differences at each CO2 level.

Image2.tiff (732.8KB, tiff)
Supplementary Figure 3

CO2 and genotype affect abscisic acid levels in Arabidopsis thaliana rosettes. Wildtype (WT) and cyp20–3 plants were grown at ambient CO2 (aCO2, 450 ppm) and elevated CO2 (eCO2, 900 ppm). Rosettes were either left undamaged or wounded when plants reached growth stage 3.9 (Boyes et al., 2001). Abscisic acid (ABA) was measured by ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Phytohormone levels in undamaged or damaged plants were analyzed by 3-factor analysis-of-variance (ANOVA) (Factors: CO2, genotype, time) followed by Tukey HSD post-hoc tests to identify significant differences (Supplementary Table 5). ABA levels are (A) lower in undamaged WT plants grown at eCO2, and (B) higher in cyp20–3 compared to WT in wounded plants. Data points represent the mean ± standard error. The temporal increase in ABA levels in response to wounding is indicated by alphabetical letters.

Image3.tiff (83.3KB, tiff)
Table1.xlsx (6MB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

All data generated from this research are presented in the results or are available in the Supplementary Material of this article. Raw read data (FASTQ) have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (Bioproject ID PRJNA1332053).


Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES