Table III.
QTLs controlling the editing efficiency of ccb206 C24 detected in a RIL population from a Col × Ler cross
QTLs were detected by using three analytical methods: SPA, IM, and CIM. cM refers to the position of the marker on the chromosome (in cM). Source indicates the parental origin of the allele that increases the editing efficiency (Col). R2 measures the proportion of variance explained by each marker. Effect is the additive effect contributed by each marker.
| Chromosome | Markera | cM | Source | F | SPA LODb | R2 | Effect | LODb | IM R2 | Effect | LODb | CIM R2 | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | g6837 | 26.4 | Col | 26.85 | 4.41 | 0.48 | 6.15 | 4.35 | 0.45 | 5.95 | 7.14 | 0.38 | 5.61 |
| 1 | m532 | 100.5 | Col | 3.39 | 0.13 | 3.33 |
For chromosome 4, only the results for the peak marker are given.
Significance threshold levels (P < 0.05: SPA = 2.59; IM = 2.7; CIM = 2.7; P < 0.01: SPA = 3.35; IM = 4; CIM = 3.8) were determined by permutation tests (see “Materials and Methods” for more details). LODs greater than the P < 0.01 threshold are shown in bold.