TABLE 2.
Top pairwise isolate combinations with the highest disease control in fruit in terms of percentage disease reduction (%DSR) and control efficacy (%CE).
| Single-isolate treatmenta | Single-isolate treatmenta | Paired-isolate treatment | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isolate 1 | %DSR | %CE | Isolate 2 | %DSR | %CE | Mix (1 + 2) | %DSR | %CE |
| EL51 | 41% | 20% | 2186 | 75.9% | 60% | EL51 + 2186 | 100.0% | 100% |
| ABR8 | 41.4% | 0% | EL51 + ABR8 | 89.7% | 80% | |||
| 2176 | 51.7% | 0% | EL51 + 2176 | 75.9% | 60% | |||
| 2186 | 76% | 60% | 2173 | 24.1% | 0% | 2186 + 2173 | 100.0% | 100% |
| ABR10 | 13.8% | 0% | 2186 + ABR10 | 86.2% | 80% | |||
| ABR8 | 41.4% | 0% | 2186 + ABR8 | 86.2% | 80% | |||
| 2175 | 6.9% | 0% | 2186 + 2175 | 82.8% | 80% | |||
| BWC | 10.3% | 0% | 2186 + BWC | 82.8% | 80% | |||
| ABR1b | 72.4% | 0% | 2186 + ABR1b | 82.8% | 80% | |||
| 2180 | 55.2% | 20% | 2186 + 2180 | 79.3% | 80% | |||
| ABR5 | 13.8% | 0% | 2186 + ABR5 | 79.3% | 60% | |||
| ABR6 | 41.4% | 0% | 2186 + ABR6 | 69.0% | 60% | |||
| ABR1s | 24% | 20% | ABR1b | 72.4% | 0% | ABR1s + ABR1b | 79.3% | 80% |
| 2176 | 51.7% | 0% | ABR1s + 2176 | 86.2% | 60% | |||
| ABR5 | 13.8% | 0% | ABR1s + ABR5 | 62.1% | 60% | |||
aRahnella sp. EL51, Erwinia sp. 2186, Pantoea sp. ABR1b, Pantoea sp. ABR1s, Pseudomonas sp. 2180, Pseudomonas sp. ABR5, Curtobacterium sp. ABR8, Microbacterium sp. 2173, Microbacterium sp. ABR10, Bacillus sp. 2175, Bacillus sp. BWC, Priestia sp. ABR6, Rhodotorula sp. 2176.