Skip to main content
. 2026 Apr 10;6:1798348. doi: 10.3389/fradi.2026.1798348

Table 5.

ICC comparison of trabecular parameter regression results.

Trabecular parameter Radiomic-feature-based model CNN regression model Distillation-learning-based CNN regression model
BV/TV 0.548 ± 0.011 0.670 ± 0.053 0.804 ± 0.037
Tb.Th 0.407 ± 0.032 0.488 ± 0.038 0.773 ± 0.042
Tb.Sp 0.356 ± 0.017 0.523 ± 0.054 0.711 ± 0.063
Tb.N 0.326 ± 0.036 0.502 ± 0.085 0.622 ± 0.133
Overall 0.409 ± 0.026 0.545 ± 0.059 0.742 ± 0.046

The compared regression methods include the radiomic-feature-based model, CNN regression model, and the proposed distillation-learning-based CNN regression model. The trabecular parameters that were regressed are BV/TV, Tb.Th, Tb.Sp, and Tb.N. BV/TV, bone volume/total volume; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; Tb.Sp, trabecular separation; Tb.N, trabecular number.