Table 5.
ICC comparison of trabecular parameter regression results.
| Trabecular parameter | Radiomic-feature-based model | CNN regression model | Distillation-learning-based CNN regression model |
|---|---|---|---|
| BV/TV | 0.548 ± 0.011 | 0.670 ± 0.053 | 0.804 ± 0.037 |
| Tb.Th | 0.407 ± 0.032 | 0.488 ± 0.038 | 0.773 ± 0.042 |
| Tb.Sp | 0.356 ± 0.017 | 0.523 ± 0.054 | 0.711 ± 0.063 |
| Tb.N | 0.326 ± 0.036 | 0.502 ± 0.085 | 0.622 ± 0.133 |
| Overall | 0.409 ± 0.026 | 0.545 ± 0.059 | 0.742 ± 0.046 |
The compared regression methods include the radiomic-feature-based model, CNN regression model, and the proposed distillation-learning-based CNN regression model. The trabecular parameters that were regressed are BV/TV, Tb.Th, Tb.Sp, and Tb.N. BV/TV, bone volume/total volume; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; Tb.Sp, trabecular separation; Tb.N, trabecular number.