Skip to main content
. 2026 Apr 21;11(2):e002510. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002510

Table 3. Multivariable regression examining factors predictive of VPTs among TBI participants controlling for demographics (Models 1–3) and multivariable ordinal regression examining factors predictive of magnitude of response expressed as ‘mild’, ‘moderate’ or ‘strong’ response to FL or GL as compared with PL tints among TBI participants while controlling for demographics (Models 4–5).

Variable Model 1: PL VPT Model 2: FL VPT Model 3: GL VPT Model 4: FL VPT magnitude of response Model 5: GL VPT magnitude of response
PHQ-9 β=−0.048 (p=0.02*) β=−0.051 (p=0.02*) OR=0.833, 95% CI 0.717 to 0.969 (p=0.02*) OR=0.829, 95% CI 0.689 to 0.998 (p=0.047*)
PCS-EN β=−0.027 (p=0.01*)
SF-12v2
 PCS OR=1.201, 95% CI 1.029 to 1.403 (p=0.021*)
 MCS OR=1.166, 95% CI 1.031 to 1.318 (p=0.02*)
BTACT Z-scores
 Word list recall
 Digits span backward
 Number series β=0.349 (p=0.01*) β=0.376 (p=0.009*)
 Category fluency OR=0.138, 95% CI 0.023 to 0.836 (p=0.03*)
 Backward counting
TBI severity code

SF-12v2, a health survey measuring physical and mental health whose domains contribute to PCS and MCS scores.

The symbol ‘–’ denotes predictors that are not significant.

Significance (p<0.05) denoted by *.

BTACT, Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone; FL, FL-41 lens; GL, grey-filtering lens; MCS, Mental Component Summary; PCS, Physical Component Summary; PCS-EN, Pain Catastrophizing Scale; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9; PL, plano lens; SF-12v2, Short-Form 12-Item Survey-version 2; TBI, traumatic brain injury; VPT, visual photosensitivity threshold.