Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1977 Winter;10(4):755–758. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-755

The analysis of group contingency data

Joseph K Neumann 1,1
PMCID: PMC1311256  PMID: 16795576

Abstract

The data analyses utilized in group contingency projects are reviewed. Previous studies are cited to emphasize advantages of nonconsolidated (“individual”) over consolidated analyses. Several procedures are described that enable applied researchers to incorporate nonconsolidated data analyses in group contingency studies.

Keywords: group contingency, data analysis, applied research

Full text

PDF
755

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen D. J., Magaro P. A. Measures of change in token-economy programs. Behav Res Ther. 1971 Nov;9(4):311–318. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(71)90043-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baer D. M., Wolf M. M., Risley T. R. Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):91–97. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gentile J. R., Roden A. H., Klein R. D. An analysis-of-variance model for the intrasubject replication design. J Appl Behav Anal. 1972 Summer;5(2):193–198. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Glover J., Gary A. L. Procedures to increase some aspects of creativity. J Appl Behav Anal. 1976 Spring;9(1):79–84. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1976.9-79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gottman J. M. N-of-one and N-of-two research in psychotherapy. Psychol Bull. 1973 Aug;80(2):93–105. doi: 10.1037/h0034803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Graubard P. S. Utilizing the group in teaching disturbed delinquents to learn. Except Child. 1969 Dec;36(4):267–272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Greenberg D. J., O'Donnell W. J. A note on the effects of group and individual contingencies upon deviant classroom behavior. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1972 Mar;13(1):55–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1972.tb01118.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Greenwood C. R., Hops H., Delquadri J., Guild J. Group contingencies for group consequences in classroom management: a further analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1974 Fall;7(3):413–425. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1974.7-413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hake D. F., Vukelich R. A classification and review of cooperation procedures. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Sep;18(2):333–343. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Harris V. W., Sherman J. A. Effects of peer tutoring and consequences on the math performance of elementary classroom students. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Winter;6(4):587–597. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kubany E. S., Sloggett B. B. A coding procedure for teachers. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Summer;6(2):339–344. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Litoe L., Pumroy D. K. A brief review of classroom group-oriented contingencies. J Appl Behav Anal. 1975 Fall;8(3):341–347. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1975.8-341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Loeber R. Engineering the behavioral engineer. J Appl Behav Anal. 1971 Winter;4(4):321–326. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1971.4-321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Long J. D., Williams R. L. The comparative effectiveness of group and individually contingent free time with inner-city junior high school students. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Fall;6(3):465–474. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Marholin D., Gray D. Effects of group response-cost procedures on cash shortages in a small business. J Appl Behav Anal. 1976 Spring;9(1):25–30. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1976.9-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Michael J. Statistical inference for individual organism research: mixed blessing or curse? J Appl Behav Anal. 1974 Winter;7(4):647–653. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1974.7-647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mitchell W. S., Stoffelmayr B. E. Application of the Premack principle to the behavioral control of extremely inactive schizrophrenics. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Fall;6(3):419–423. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Packard R. G. The control of "classroom attention": a group contingency for complex behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1970 Spring;3(1):13–28. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1970.3-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. SKINNER B. F. Are theories of learning necessary? Psychol Rev. 1950 Jul;57(4):193–216. doi: 10.1037/h0054367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Winkler R. C. Management of chronic psychiatric patients by a token reinforcement system. J Appl Behav Anal. 1970 Spring;3(1):47–55. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1970.3-47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES