Skip to main content
. 2026 Apr 21;28(4):479. doi: 10.3390/e28040479
Procedure 2 Simulation and dual-criterion estimation procedure
  • Initialization:
    • Fix the design parameters p, m, and K. In the following examples, we set m=5, the target level p=0.25, and K{15,30,50}.
    • Select an initial threshold s˜1 based on expert knowledge and perform K trials at this level to obtain a first estimate of (cT,aT). Since s˜1 is not calibrated to exactly match the target level p, the resulting probability p1 may differ from p. Therefore, p is adjusted using p^1 so as to satisfy p^1pm1α.
  • For each stage j=2,,m:

  • 1. Generation of K trials:
    • Perform K trials at the current threshold s˜j, leading to binary observations
      Yj,i=1R˜j,is˜j,i=1,,K,
      where R˜j,i are simulated under G(c,a)j1.
    • Compute the empirical conditional probability
      p^j=1Ki=1KYj,i,
      and construct a confidence interval I1γ(p^j) with confidence level 1γ=0.8 (see Section 5.2).
  • 2. Parameter space restriction:
    • Define the set of admissible parameters Sj as those for which the theoretical conditional probability under the Generalized Pareto model lies within the confidence interval I1γ (see (11) and (12)).
  • 3. Stability criterion:
    • Among the candidates in Sj, select the parameter pair (c^,a^)j by minimizing the discrepancy between successive conditional quantile estimates:
      (c^,a^)j=argmin(c,a)Sj(s˜j1s˜j2)G(c,a+cs˜j2)1(1p^j1).
    • From the estimated parameters, retrieve the (1p)-quantile of the estimated conditional distribution G(c^,a^)j:
      s˜j+1=Gc^,a^j1(1p)+s˜j,
  • 4. Final estimator:
    • The estimator of the target extreme quantile q˜1α is given by the final threshold s˜m.