Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1974 Spring;7(1):87–91. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1974.7-87

A procedure for maintaining student progress in a personalized university course1

L Keith Miller 1, F Hal Weaver 1, George Semb 1
PMCID: PMC1311652  PMID: 16795468

Abstract

Ten students in a personalized university course were given target dates for completing each of 26 lessons. The lessons could be completed before those dates, but not after. The first two failures to complete a lesson by the target date led to “warnings”; the next failure required the student to withdraw from the course. When each student's rate of lesson completion was compared with and without target dates, it was found that students completed an average of 1.0 lesson a day with the target-date contingency and 0.3 without it. Individual data indicated that most students did few or no lessons without the contingency. It was concluded that a target-date contingency is an effective method for maintaining student progress in personalized university courses.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alba E., Pennypacker H. S. A multiple change score comparison of traditional and behavioral college teaching procedures. J Appl Behav Anal. 1972 Summer;5(2):121–124. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Born D. G., Gledhill S. M., Davis M. L. Examination performance in lecture-discussion and personalized instruction courses. J Appl Behav Anal. 1972 Spring;5(1):33–43. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Keller F. S. "Good-bye, teacher...". J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):79–89. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lloyd K. E., Knutzen N. J. A self-paced programmed undergraduate course in the experimental analysis of behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Summer;2(2):125–133. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McMichael J. S., Corey J. R. Contingency management in an introductory psychology course produces better learning. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Summer;2(2):79–83. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sheppard W. C., Macdermot H. G. Design and evaluation of a programmed course in introductory psychology. J Appl Behav Anal. 1970 Spring;3(1):5–11. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1970.3-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES