Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1975 Fall;8(3):279–286. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1975.8-279

The use of prompts to enhance vicarious effects of nonverbal approval.

A E Kazdin, N A Silverman, J L Sittler
PMCID: PMC1311853  PMID: 1184492

Abstract

The effect of nonverbal teacher approval (physical contact in the form of patting approvingly) delivered to target subjects on the attentive behavior of adjacent peers was examined in a special-education classroom. In a reversal design, two pairs of moderately retarded children were exposed to nonverbal approval, with only one subject in each pair receiving approval. In different phases, nonverbal approval was delivered alone or in conjunction with a verbal prompt directed to the adjacent peer or to the class as a whole. The prompt was designed to make salient the target subject's attentive behavior and the nonverbal reinforcing consequences that followed. Providing contingent nonverbal approval alone consistently altered attentive behavior of the target subjects but did not alter the attentive behavior of adjacent peers. However, accompanying nonverbal approval with a verbal prompt did increase attentive behavior of nonreinforced peers.

Full text

PDF
281

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Broden M., Bruce C., Mitchell M. A., Carter V., Hall R. V. Effects of teacher attention on attending behavior of two boys at adjacent desks. J Appl Behav Anal. 1970 Fall;3(3):199–203. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1970.3-199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Drabman R. S., Lahey B. B. Feedback in classroom behavior modification: effects on the target and her classmates. J Appl Behav Anal. 1974 Winter;7(4):591–598. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1974.7-591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Herman S. H., Tramontana J. Instructions and group versus individual reinforcement in modifying disruptive group behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1971 Summer;4(2):113–119. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1971.4-113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kazdin A. E., Klock J. The effect of nonverbal teacher approval on student attentive behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Winter;6(4):643–654. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kazdin A. E. Role of instructions and reinforcement in behavior changes in token reinforcement programs. J Educ Psychol. 1973 Feb;64(1):63–71. doi: 10.1037/h0034073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kazdin A. E. The effect of vicarious reinforcement on attentive behavior in the classroom. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Spring;6(1):71–78. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. O'leary K. D., Becker W. C., Evans M. B., Saudargas R. A. A token reinforcement program in a public school: a replication and systematic analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Spring;2(1):3–13. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Packard R. G. The control of "classroom attention": a group contingency for complex behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1970 Spring;3(1):13–28. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1970.3-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Patterson G. R. Interventions for boys with conduct problems: multiple settings, treatments, and criteria. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974 Aug;42(4):471–481. doi: 10.1037/h0036731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES