Table 4.
Social Support, Dyadic Coping, and Oral Frailty Score Profiles in Elderly Ovarian Cancer Patients
| Scales and Dimensions | Number of Entries | Least Value | Crest Value | Total Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social support | 10 | 15 | 62 | 37.82±7.98 |
| Objective support | 3 | 4 | 30 | 18.62±3.83 |
| Subjective support | 4 | 3 | 21 | 10.78±2.31 |
| Utilization of supported features | 3 | 3 | 12 | 8.27±1.62 |
| Active Dyadic Coping | 27 | 48 | 130 | 97.64±10.78 |
| PressureCommunication | 8 | 18 | 42 | 31.9±5.54 |
| Supports Dyadic Coping | 10 | 18 | 50 | 38.14±5.41 |
| Dyadic Coping Proxy | 4 | 3 | 16 | 7.76±1.42 |
| Joint Dyadic Coping | 5 | 5 | 25 | 18.73±3.20 |
| Negative Dyadic Coping | 8 | 8 | 40 | 14.12±3.25 |
| Dyadic Coping Total Score | 37 | 62 | 172 | 112.18±21.21 |
| Oral Frailty | 8 | 0 | 12 | 5.31±0.98 |
| Dentures? | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1.25±0.03 |
| Function of deglutition | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0.89±0.02 |
| Oral health-related behaviors | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1.35±0.05 |
| Chewing ability | 3 | 0 | 4 | 1.44±0.29 |
| Engagement | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.34±0.01 |